
Developer. Builder. Lifelong learner. Tokens Burner. Agent Orchestration Officer @EseralLabs
Joined January 2009
- Tweets2.1K
- Following882
- Followers754
- Likes19.7K
Yamil 🇦🇷🧉 retweeted
In the last 24 hours:
1. iPhone 11 through 16 are apparently vulnerable to remote attacks.
2. SSL certificates are broken until browsers remove eMudhra CA.
3. PHP >9 vulnerability CVE published (tomorrow).
The world is about to witness things that have never been seen before.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The post's iPhone claim is inaccurate; a leaked Cellebrite forensic tool targets a Bluetooth bug patched in iOS 26.5 and does not affect updated devices. The eMudhra CA and PHP issues are real incidents but framed sensationally.
justin.sh/blog/2026/10/c…
blog.mozilla.org/security/2026/…
php.net
Los últimos modelos chinos hicieron foco en mejorar la velocidad y el costo en vez de cambios enorme de inteligencia.
Llegamos al nivel de inteligencia que nos alcanzan para la mayoría de las tareas?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Space Performance + Bunny Speed
🚀🐰 Yes, Space Bunny - which has topped global leaderboards with 200T+ tokens - was an earlier version of M3.1 Flash.
💰Redefining the performance economics of agentic AI. M3.1 Flash achieves frontier-level intelligence across key tasks such as Cowork (Automation-Bench: 62%; ALE: 30%), Coding (DeepSWE: 74%) and Visual Reasoning (BabyVision: 91%), at 1/3 the cost of M3 and 3x the speed.
API pricing (flat rate): $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, with cache reads at $0.015 / 1M tokens.
Model weights will arrive on Oct 23.
API: platform.minimax.io
M Plan: minimax.io/m-plan
MiniMax Code for desktop: agent.minimax.io/download
Yamil 🇦🇷🧉 retweeted
50年以上使われてきたB-treeを、数式で置き換えられるかもしれない。しかも、その「学習」はニューラルネットですらなく、単純な回帰だ。
learned_index_labは、ソート済みデータの索引を木構造ではなく数式で表現するPGM(Piecewise Geometric Model)IndexをRustで実装したプロジェクトだ。キーと格納位置の関係を複数の直線で近似し、「このキーならこのあたりにある」と予測する。予測誤差はε以内に保証され、その狭い範囲だけを最後に二分探索するため、結果は近似ではなく正確になる。
READMEの実験では、100万件の規則的なデータをわずか83本の直線で表現し、RustのBTreeMapと比べてインデックスのメモリを約99.99%削減、検索も平均約3倍高速だったとしている。実装自体もシンプルで、データを一度走査しながら許容できる傾きの範囲を更新し、誤差条件を満たせなくなったところで新しい線分を作る。
面白いのは、これが「AIをデータベースに載せる」話ではなく、従来のデータ構造そのものを予測問題として捉え直している点だ。
github.com/gilnett/learned_i…
Ya no tiene sentido seguir preocupandose por 'proteger' el software.
Tenemos cientos de casos que muestran que el camino es el open source.
En un mundo en el que se le puede hacer ingeniería inversa a todo, y que no escondiendo tu software detrás de una API lo vas a salvar. ¿Cómo se protege un producto?
Es que cualquier cosa que hagas te la van a copiar alguien en china y lo ofrecerá más barato y puede que hasta mejor.
No tengo ni idea de que pensar
Lo escondes detrás de un correo? Por ejemplo: mándame los datos por correo y mi software te los devuelve procesados
No se ni si tiene sentido, pero desde luego muchas empresas prefieren eso a aprender a usar la enésima aplicación
Sooo great!
Tantos sitios requieren un desktop para funcionar y con esto se puede tener uno para cada bot.
YOUR HERMES AGENT CAN HAVE ITS OWN DESKTOP. WATCH IT WORK LIVE, TAKE CONTROL, AND HAND IT RIGHT BACK.
This is one of the standout capabilities included in Hermes v0.22.0, The Threshold Release. 🔥
It's called Bot Screen, and here's what makes it so cool:
➤ Its Own Desktop
Your Hermes bot gets a dedicated desktop on a Linux gateway, where it can use browsers, terminals, and apps without taking over your computer.
➤ Watch It Work Live
See exactly what your agent is doing on its desktop, in real time.
➤ Take Control Anytime
Need to handle a login, 2FA, or CAPTCHA? Jump in with your mouse and keyboard, complete the step, and hand control right back to Hermes.
➤ Keep Working Remotely
Your bot can continue working on the gateway even after you close Hermes Desktop or shut your laptop.
Bot Screen first landed a few weeks ago, but it's worth highlighting again as part of the new stable release.
If you missed it the first time, check out this demo! 🔥
Yamil 🇦🇷🧉 retweeted
More SF observations:
1. Seeing the word "inference" on billboards in SF still blows my mind. 99.9% of america has no idea what inference is and I wonder how many know what an agent is. Will Muse, Instinct, Dots etc will change that over the next 12 months?
2. You know who doesn't get enough credit? Manus. In March 2025 they shipped the blueprint for AI agents: every task gets its own computer in the cloud, you can watch it work, it writes a todo list and checks it off, and you walk away while it finishes. So much of what we use today runs on those ideas!
3. Your product now has to sell itself twice. First the agent has to pick it, then the human has to trust that pick enough to say yes.
4. I was talking to a guy who told me we should just destroy all the data centers. I think that sentiment is more common than people in SF realize. You can already see some of the big AI companies adjusting positioning their AI as something that helps people and gives them more time/cures for cancers etc.
5. AI is making people work 5x faster (at least), so for freelancers/agencies that charge per hour you're earning 5x less per unit of work. But your rate is the same? I think a lot of freelancers and agencies are about to have to rethink how they price.
6. Running a company now feels kinda dystopian sometimes, especially with a small team of a few humans and a lot of agents. Some days the Slack channel is mostly bots reporting to each other, and you're the only one in the room with a pulse.
7. Every product company is turning into a product studio. I see it firsthand as a co-founder of @meetLCA , which is basically a Labs as a Service company incubating new products for companies. (DM me if you want to work together in 2027).
8. Personal software is exploding. People at every company are building their own little tools for their own jobs. It's amazing for productivity and a nightmare for IT, because nobody knows what's running or who owns it.
9. Revenue per human is the new flex. Founders used to brag about headcount. Now they brag about how much they're doing with how few people.
11. More founders are using agents for customer research. Agents run the interviews, read every support ticket and summarize what people are begging for. Synthetic market research is the new thing.
12. Shipping technology that actually takes 3-6 months with unique partnerships that are hard to replicate. So, partnerships are sooo back!
13. Insane amount of young people (22 or younger) making absurds amounts of money. At least it feels that way. Never seen anything like that, even during mobile era.
14. Only 2% of the US is paying for AI products, but it feels like 110% SF is.
15. Advice for college grads used to be “follow your passion” and now it’s follow careers that are not document- driven, rules-bound and verifiable
16. Seeing the word inference on billboards in SF still blows my mind.
17. Agents paying for things feels futuristic. I think its coming, only a matter of time, but I’m wondering when it becomes mainstream. 2027?
18. Lots of talk about proactive agents being the next phase of personal agents. Right now you ask your agent to do something. In 2027, it’s all going to be about noticing things (context/memory) and acting first. "Your flight got delayed, I already rebooked you."
19. The quote "what the smartest people do on the weekend is what everyone else will do during the week in 10 years." by Chris Dixon. It feels like that length of time isnt 10 years anymore, its 12 months.
20. This is the most asymmetric window I've ever seen in business.
My DMs are open. Respond to the most interesting ones.
Loved my trip to SF. Until next time. Maybe NYC next?
Thank you for everything.
I'm rooting for you.
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
Hablando de la importancia de los datos...
Además de ser el esqueleto del sistema y el negocio que alimenta ahora también sirve para entrenar ia.
Data brokers are now buying up SaaS data sets for anywhere from $100K to $2M
SaaS are struggling now and some extra money to fill the gap by declining revenues is nice
That data is then re-sold to AI training companies and AI frontier labs for the exact purpose of integrating whatever that SaaS did into the AI frontier lab's app
Pretty obvious to see where this is going
El dato es lo importante
Siempre lo fue, aunque antes era costoso construir las herramientas que lo transformen y le eso creímos que era importante.
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies.
My observations:
1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively.
2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now.
3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention.
4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is.
5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now.
6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text.
They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it.
7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy.
8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies.
Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here.
9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens.
10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity!
11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it.
12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable.
13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think.
14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data.
15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open.
16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down.
17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building?
18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone.
19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good.
20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped.
21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense.
Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era.
Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways.
Happy to be home and locked in.
Until next time!
Resolviendo problemas matemáticos con los tokens que le sobran, de Claude, cuenta normal, nada de modelos de laboratorio.
story time! 🐉
this is the tale of a lazily crafted one-shot cron job prompt that resulted in autonomous solutions for uncracked codebreaking challenges, more efficient ways of multiplying matrices, and a new computer-verified bound on a number theory problem that's been open since 1932.
so last week, i had a $200 claude account sitting around that had just gotten a full weekly reset. i hate wasting tokens.
the labs have been knocking out unsolved problems left and right lately, and i caught myself thinking… why not give it a shot?
so i sent claude this prompt, typos and all:
"can you wraite a promtp for a cron job that can run every day thajt will try to find solutions to unsolved ciphers or transltions or math problems or theormes or things of that nature!! every day a new attempt as hard as possible all day without giving ujp and with maximum ceraitvityy, resourcesleflses, andpersticense! dont worry about token spend! and dont forget a bit all caps lots of emojis celebration to notify the uers if we get any intersting or sucsfful confirmd reulsts!!"
yes, admittedly not my best work 😆
but Opus-5.5 ran with the ball and turned that one sloppy sentence into "THE DAILY ORACLE 🔮"
it's a swarm of Fable + Opus agents that clocks in every morning at 4:20 (obviously), builds and maintains its own hit list of well over a hundred of humanity's unsolved problems, and then goes full send on a handful of them every shift. ciphers nobody has broken, scripts nobody can read, conjectures nobody has proven, record tables nobody has beaten.
and there's one rule above all the others: nothing counts until skeptic agents, each starting from a fresh context and writing their own code, rebuild the result from scratch and sign off on it. if any of them can't reproduce it, can't confirm it's new, or thinks we stretched the definition of "solved," it doesn't count.
day 1, the legion picked its own target: J.-F. Bouchaudy's cipher-machine challenges. these are simulations of real vintage machines (Hebern rotor machines, the Kryha, Lorenz, SIGABA), with problems that had been sitting on his solver tables with no solver for months or years.
on the morning of day 2, i was half asleep when my laptop suddenly says, in a robot voice:
"Breakthrough. The Daily Oracle has a confirmed solution."
👁️👄👁️
i was startled.
then the ALL CAPS emoji flood hits my screen. Hebern 5-rotor Problem 8 🔓 then Kryha v2 Problem 5 🔓
i emailed the author, Jean-François Bouchaudy, a French cryptography enthusiast who builds these machine simulators and challenges as a labor of love (he told me he started out programming on punch cards 🥹). he checked both solutions and put my name on his solver tables as the first and only solver 🫡
for context: his tables are a who's who of serious classical codebreakers. they'd cleared the sibling problems on these same machines, but nobody had cracked these two. in his words:
"two of my most complex problems—ones that no other expert had managed to solve… I knew AI would eventually be applied to classical cryptography, but I thought I would have to wait years to see it happen."
he ended his email with: "I offer my congratulations in the Japanese manner: with a deep, respectful bow." 🙇 honestly one of the most wholesome emails i've ever received
and then, over the next few days, more started landing 🧮
📐 graph theory: 7 explicit graphs bigger than the current entries in the degree-diameter table, which asks how big a network can get when every node has limited connections and every pair is only a few hops apart. the biggest jump is 13,365 vertices vs the table's 11,785, a +13.4% improvement.
🔢 number theory: Lehmer's totient problem has been open since 1932. we pushed the bound so that any counterexample now has to be bigger than 10^50. the previous certified bound was 10^26. the problem itself is still open, but the lower bound just jumped 24 orders of magnitude.
⚡ matrix multiplication: this is the operation underneath basically all of modern AI compute. the legion found schemes that use fewer multiplications than the public catalogues we checked for several matrix shapes, like ⟨15,16,16⟩ in 2,180 multiplications vs the best known 2,223. these build on LITA's square schemes, and we credit them by name.
📡 coding theory: 30 error-correcting codes bigger than the best known entries in A. E. Brouwer's tables.
🛡️ AI safety benchmarks: we found counterexamples for 2 neural-network verification instances from VNN-COMP 2026 that no participating tool resolved within the competition time limit, and pushed a defended RobustBench model below its listed robustness score. small dents, but real ones.
the bloopers are part of the story too:
— at one point, some agents snuck past a website's bot filter to check a record table. we retracted every result that depended on it. no evasion, no celebration.
— two of our records got beaten by a human contributor before we could even publish them. the frontier moves FAST.
now as is customary around here, time to share the magic!
so… without further ado…
La ventaja de que el usuario mismo pueda solucionar su propio problema como más le guste.
Es sabido que la gran dificultad de la ingenieria de software fue bajar a tierra los requerimientos y que el dev se acerque a eso.
Unas cosas de REA que me sorprendieron:
1. Le puedes pasar un driver de impresora o un binario viejo de Windows y el agente se pone a mirar cómo se hablan el hardware y el software.
2. El mismo flujo sirve para firmware, drivers y sistemas legacy que normalmente piden a alguien que sepa de eso.
3. Hace más realistas los parches de compatibilidad: hardware acceleration que no está soportado, o software viejo que quieres correr en un sistema nuevo.
4. Puedes hacerle una pregunta concreta al binario sin decompilarlo entero primero.
No te da el código original.
Te da evidencia suficiente para entender la pieza que te importa.
Todo el mundo está abriendo juegos y apps ajenas para ver cómo están hechas. El problema es que tu agente no sabe usar Ghidra.
REA le pone esa capa. Es un MCP y un CLI: le señalas el binario, la app o el sitio, y el agente investiga sin el código fuente. Hopper, con demo gratis, o Ghidra. Saca pseudocódigo, assembly, strings, símbolos y quién llama a quién.
Si es Electron, mira módulos, imports, rutas e IPC. Si es .NET, metadata e instrucciones. Si es un APK, el manifest y las clases. Si es una web, estructura, scripts y lo que pide por red.
El resultado no es “ya está, copia esto”. Es una explicación con evidencia: de dónde salió cada conclusión y qué no pudo ver. Con eso, el agente escribe su propia versión en tu proyecto.
Una reconstrucción aproximada de la lógica, no el archivo que escribió el equipo original.
Sirve en Claude Code, Codex, Cursor y cualquier agente que hable MCP o se pueda llamar por terminal. El análisis corre en local. `npx rea-agents setup`.
El permiso sigue siendo tuyo.
Entender una feature no te autoriza a clonar el producto.
github.com/morluto/rea
En que capa estás?
Karpathy dice que la diferencia en cómo la gente entiende (y usa) la IA se está volviendo un embudo muy afilado.
La mayoría del mundo ve una cosa, y un grupo pequeñísimo ve algo completamente distinto. El futuro de esta tecnología no llega parejo para todos. Llega en forma de embudo.
Estos son los niveles del embudo (de más gente a menos):
- Unos 6.000 millones de personas (la gran mayoría) casi no han tocado un LLM (como ChatGPT u otros). No tienen idea real de lo que hay.
- Unos 1-2.000 millones lo han usado un poco, normalmente la versión gratis. Ven un chatbot medio torpe o útil a medias: algo como un Google mejorado, ayuda para escribir un poco, o que a veces intenta hacer una tarea simple. Muchos dicen (con razón desde su experiencia) que no les cambia mucho la vida. Incluso profesionales que no trabajan en código o matemáticas suelen estar aquí.
- Unas 20 millones de personas (sobre todo programadores, matemáticos e investigadores) están viendo algo distinto: proyectos grandes que antes les llevaban semanas o meses ahora se resuelven con un prompt y agentes de IA. Hacer apps, copiarlas, traducirlas, analizar código binario, etc. Esto ha cambiado muy rápido en el último año.
- Solo unas 5.000 personas (las que tienen acceso interno a los sistemas más avanzados dentro de las empresas de IA) ven el nivel más alto: enjambres de miles de agentes trabajando durante semanas en proyectos enormes. Cosas como descubrir fallos de seguridad graves (zero-days), ataques y defensas cibernéticas a velocidad de máquina, nuevos descubrimientos científicos o avances en matemáticas que a un experto le llevarían años. A veces los humanos ya no alcanzan a revisar o entender todo lo que sale.
Por qué pasa esto:
1. El impacto depende de qué tan grande sea el problema que le pidas.
Una pregunta corta casi no pone a prueba el sistema. Solo se nota el poder real cuando le das problemas grandes, difíciles y que de verdad te importan (como construir software complejo o investigar algo serio).
2. La capacidad no es igual en todas las áreas (cuando dice “jagged” se refiere a irregular).
Brilla muchísimo donde se puede comprobar fácilmente si está bien o mal (el código corre o no corre, el cálculo da o no da, pasó el test o no). Eso se entrena fácil con aprendizaje por refuerzo (RL). En cosas más subjetivas (escribir un email bonito, dar consejos de vida, etc.) es más difícil de mejorar y, además, genera menos dinero, así que las empresas no priorizan tanto esas áreas.
3. El acceso es por niveles.
Gratis → de pago → interno (solo dentro de las empresas). El “oro” está en el negocio entre empresas (B2B) y en dominios digitales que se pueden verificar, por eso ahí se concentra el esfuerzo de mejora.
Mientras todo esto pasa, la mayoría de los NPCs como Momo ve un chatbot medio útil o un poco torpe, y un grupo muy pequeño está viviendo un cambio vertiginoso porque la curva de capacidad se ha puesto casi vertical. Mientras muchos siguen discutiendo “si la IA sirve para algo”, unos pocos ya están en otra realidad.
Cómo en todo, eql futuro no llega parejo para todos.
Llega en embudo.
Buen stack de infra barato.
De esa lista todavía uso resend.
Y me interesó el de storage.
Se pueden vibecodear juegos completos, como no te vas a vibecodear un gestor de newsletter.
Bye bye Beehiiv 👋
I vibe-coded my own newsletter platform:
📧 Campaign management w/ editor
🖥️ Web archives (newsletter.marclou.com)
🔗 API support
🫧 List cleanup, deliverability reports
It took a few prompts with Opus 5.5.
I left Beehiiv because they raised prices for the 3rd time in 2 years.
- My first yearly bill was $1,000.
- My future bill would have been $4,000.
Now I'm using AWS SES + MongoDB, and I will pay less than $300/year.
Newsletter platforms charge per subscriber, when in fact the real cost is the number of emails sent. Subscribers will naturally become inactive, so you end up paying more for something that hurts your deliverability (sending to dormant subscribers = spam trap).
So I've set a cleanup cron job for my newsletter alternative. It marks inactive subs as dormant, sends one last re-engaging email, and stops emailing them. Money saved. Deliverability increased.
I also gain a priceless feature: Freedom. I can change the UI, add features, connect all my apps - anything is possible with just a prompt.
I'm replacing Resend next. I love it, but it's very expensive ($400/mo)






























