pairing against @ondo tokenized stocks is underrated. Every launch adds depth to their pools on UNIv4, so the stocks themselves become more composable for everyone else building on top...
in less than a day, solana:KeGv7bsfR4MheC1CkmnAVceoApjrkvBhHYjWb67ondo and $SPCXon each gained ~$10k in liquid depth (partly locked as design)
there’s something here: indexes can act as a proxy for a real omnipool. The design still has a lot of room to grow, and it’s already performing beyond what we hoped
what’s incredible about @Ledger hack is how sophisticated the “attackers” are. somewhere there’s a physical setup monitoring it all sim-by-sim, paying a monthly gig cost, and waiting for the optimal moment to “slurp” the funds. honestly, real engineering work. perhaps insiders?
most launchpads treat established tokens as competition. I think they should be the foundation.
new indexes don't pair against ETH or USDC, they pair against the tokens that already earned their place. For instance, DOPE launched today with real $DOGE and $PEPE as its liquidity.
every launch creates demand for the underlying assets. Every buy routes volume through them. Every new index locks more of their supply.
new launches should strengthen what they're built on, not drain it.
Ondex was designed to bring @ethereum communities together and push Mainnet back to what it was meant to be: the home of liquidity and innovation.
Aligning our token pair with @senderdotfamily was a natural fit. Sender tokens, $SEND included, can be used as index constituents, bringing new pools, TVL and volume into the Sender ecosystem.
Separate products, shared direction. Partners, pushing Ethereum forward together.
Return to Mainnet.























