@worm_holedi
iAccount based inCanada
About this account
- Account based in
- Canada
- Connected via
- Canada Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Joined April 2016
- Tweets1.3K
- Following444
- Followers105
- Likes985
TylerTheHungry retweeted
We will not tolerate illegal dumping in Alberta.
Last year Calgary alone got about 30,000 complaints about illegal dumping. Piles left on roadsides, on farmland, on private property. Illegal dumping is not a victimless crime. Somebody always pays to clean it up and it is almost never the person who did it. The people stuck with the bill are the landowners, the municipalities and the taxpayers.
This fall we are bringing in the toughest penalties in the country. Fines up to $100,000 for individuals and up to $1 million for corporations, plus jail time of up to six months.
Albertans take pride in their communities. Our laws should back that up, and our cities deserve better than this.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
🚨 CAUGHT IN THE ACT: The City of Calgary has been caught ILLEGALLY removing a Let Alberta Decide referendum sign.
Even more damning: LAD says multiple signs were removed while adjacent federalist “No to the Nine” signs were left untouched.
The city has some explaining to do.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Here are some actual numbers for the Alberta independence discussion. As Dennis Kalma shows, his model still projects a surplus of roughly $6 billion to $16 billion a year.
If we want to have this conversation like adults, let’s follow Dennis’s example and examine the numbers and the assumptions behind them.
Replying to @calgarysun
Professor Tombe raises three things.
Take all three at full value and the answer does not change.
1. Federal debt interest.
It is already in the paper. Forward to Freedom carries C$6.2 billion a year — the Library of Parliament's full population-share attribution, which we treat as the ceiling, not the midpoint.
It is one of four shocks in the adverse test, and the balance survives it.
This article says so two paragraphs before it says the surplus doesn't include it.
2. Defence at the NATO target.
Our mature force is C$5.0 billion, about 1.05 per cent of output — the cost of a described force, not a target.
If Alberta joined NATO and met 2 per cent, that is roughly C$9.6 billion, about C$4.6 billion more.
3. Pensions.
We ring-fence retirement income in an Alberta Pension Plan rather than running it through general revenue. That is a stated modelling choice, disclosed on the page, and Section 6 tests whether the plan carries the book as the population ages.
Bring it back onto general revenue and it is about C$5.1 billion.
But then note that the Alberta Pension Plan - without those disbursements - would be significantly overfunded and would likely cut contribution requirements.
Almost like a tax cut under a different name.
Now add all three: C$6.2 + C$4.6 + C$5.1 = C$15.9 billion.
Against a starting balance of C$22.2 to C$32.1 billion, that leaves C$6 to C$16 billion a year — still a surplus.
That is the point.
Every objection in this article can be granted in full, and Alberta still pays its way.
The workbook is published; anyone can redo that subtraction in a spreadsheet.
@ATCAlberta
@ikwilson
@RiseOfAlberta
TylerTheHungry retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Two major new Alberta Transition Council reports released today.
The findings:
➡️ ~$4.96B one-time transition cost
➡️ $22.2B–$32.1B left over EVERY YEAR after paying the modeled costs of running an independent country
Those are remarkable numbers.
Alberta has enormous fiscal capacity--an economic powerhouse.
albertatransitioncouncil.com…
TylerTheHungry retweeted
The Edmonton-Strathcona MP is sending residents a letter that says, in part:
“The questions posed in this referendum seek to divide Canadians based on where they were born. They seek to deny some of the most basic human rights, including access to healthcare and education, to people who came to Canada looking to build a better life for themselves and their families.
Hate is not the answer to our problems.”
Asking citizens questions in a referendum is not hate. It is civic engagement.
Telling people their vote will deny others basic human rights is fearmongering.
How does an elected official get away with misleading Albertans like this? And if taxpayer funds were used to send this letter, why are taxpayers paying for it?
TylerTheHungry retweeted
It It is unbelievable to me that anyone is being attacked for questioning Elections Alberta or seeking clarification, particularly about the process surrounding such a consequential and highly charged referendum, so long as those questions are reasonable and respectfully asked.
There is no doubt that emotions are running high. But if we want to reduce uncertainty and distrust, the answer is to respond to questions with clear information, not attacks and accusations. I honestly cannot believe this needs to be said, but this is apparently the state of our society today…
We should expect our public officials and institutions to be accountable, transparent and held to a high standard. I make no apology for expecting that.
I am also tired of being told we should congratulate public officials and institutions simply for doing the jobs they are paid to do. In some cases, government actions have caused real harm. Are those affected supposed to simply say thank you? Of course not!
Public service is not about being praised for “trying your best.” It is about serving the public competently, transparently and accountably and taking responsibility when things go wrong.
Perhaps we need to turn this relationship right-side up again. The hostility toward legitimate scrutiny may be one reason so many people have lost trust in the first place.
Last night, Elections Alberta responded to concerns raised by the public in a way that I find troubling.
Raising a potential issue with an electoral process and asking Elections Alberta to clarify the process it is not “disinformation,” “false information” or “the latest disinformation campaign.”
Rather than immediately accusing people of spreading disinformation, Elections Alberta should simply provide clear and accurate information addressing the concern. That should be the priority for any public institution, but particularly one entrusted with something as important as election integrity.
If eligibility depends on a person’s “ordinary residence,” Elections Alberta should clearly explain how that requirement applies to special ballots, including ballots mailed outside the province, what identification is required, how eligibility is verified and what safeguards are in place.
The best way to counter false information is with clear, complete and accessible facts.
It should not be this difficult for a public institution to inform citizens and respond to legitimate concerns without making sweeping and unfounded accusations against the very people it is meant to serve.
Election integrity depends on public confidence, and public confidence must be earned. It cannot be demanded.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Alberta has a long history of welcoming a responsible and sustainable number of newcomers to our province who come here, get a job, build a life, and contribute to our province.
Unfortunately, over the last 10 years the federal system has let temporary programs grow far beyond what they were designed for, and it’s putting pressure on the housing, schools and health care every family relies on. Temporary residents contribute about $150 million to our tax base annually, yet the cost to provide services for them is over $1 billion. It’s simply not fair to Alberta taxpayers.
That’s why referendum proposes ways Alberta can:
✔️moderate population growth
✔️prioritize jobs for Albertans
✔️strengthen social services
On October 19, Albertans have a chance to have their say on how immigration works in our province.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Good morning from the outer rims of Noah’s ark!
Core drilling has begun and the Big Bang Evolutionists are already on damage control mode.
No other study in the history of the Durupinar site has been conducted with official permits and oversight of Turkish Universities.
Some of the most brilliant minds in the world are a part of this 2026 Expedition.
This is the only study that matters.
When we are done, University curriculums will need to be re-written, and Darwinism will be dismantled.
This is the place where creation began anew.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
THIS IS INSANE:
“Hey Mario, just the heads up, the mail-in voting for the Alberta referendum is completely open to anybody.
I just registered, I'm from BC, they didn't ask me anything.
Only clicked a box that I'm a Canadian citizen.
No verification of Alberta residents and they will mail the ballot anywhere.
I even put an American address and they would have mailed it there,
This is crazy!!!”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Claims that Alberta's referendum mail-in voting is open to non-residents without checks are false. Special ballots are only for eligible Alberta residents; completed packages must include a signed declaration and ID proving residency, verified before counting.
elections.ab.ca/voters/how-to-…
elections.ab.ca/resources/medi…
elections.ab.ca/voters/who-can…
TylerTheHungry retweeted
There is something deeply unhealthy happening in our public discourse.
When people question government policy, they are called extremists.
When they raise concerns about immigration or social cohesion, they are called racists.
When they question public-health decisions or speak about vaccine injuries, they are called anti-vaxxers.
When they challenge the constitutional status quo or discuss Alberta’s future, they are called traitors.
These labels are rarely intended to encourage dialogue. They are used to end it.
But questioning government is not extremism.
Challenging existing laws is not lawlessness.
Discussing constitutional change is not disloyalty.
And disagreeing with government policy does not make someone dangerous.
In a healthy democracy, citizens are free to question authority, challenge prevailing ideas and advocate for change. That is not a threat to democracy. It is democracy.
The real danger is a political culture that silences legitimate concerns, punishes disagreement, disparages citizens and treats them as enemies simply because they refuse to conform.
We will not rebuild public trust by ignoring this reality. We will rebuild public trust by listening, answering difficult questions and addressing the substance of their concerns.
Dialogue does not weaken a country. Refusing to have it does.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Wow. Brookfield launches a $50 BILLION investment fund with the Canadian Pension Plan to leverage the retirement savings of millions of Canadians so private shareholders like Mark Carney can earn even bigger profits.
The potential for a conflict of interest is staggering.
My letter to the Prime Minister encouraging him to do the right thing and sell his stock options, deferred shares and all other Brookfield assets. 👉
TylerTheHungry retweeted
👏👏👏👏👏👏
A standing ovation for @TuckerCarlson who FINALLY condemned TPUSA for acting in ways Charlie Kirk would have “vehemently disagree with”
…. And he DIRECTLY called out @BlakeSNeff in this 5 minute segment from his show tonight
This video is larger than Cloudflare's 512 MB cache, so it can't be played through. More donations are needed to cover a larger cache. Donate
TylerTheHungry retweeted
According to an informed federal official, in the coming months the Trump administration plans to send a total of 40,000 Mark 84 and Blu-117 bombs to the government of Israel. Each bomb weighs 2,000 pounds. This appears to be the largest transfer of conventional explosive ordnance from the United States in modern history.
How big is this shipment? It amounts to 40,000 tons of bombs. For perspective, the largest American air raid of World War Two was the Eighth Air Force’s attack on Berlin in March of 1945. Combined, the 2,023 Allied aircraft involved dropped about 3,000 tons of bombs. That’s 7.5 percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. That same month, March of 1945, the US Army Air Forces began the single most destructive bombing raid in human history, Operation Meetinghouse over Tokyo. More than 100,000 Japanese civilians were killed. By the end of that operation, the US had dropped 1,600 tons of bombs. That’s four percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. World War Two ended five months later, when the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. The shipment Trump is sending to Israel amounts to more than three times the destructive power of that nuclear explosion. There is no precedent for what the Trump administration is doing.
Nor is there a justification. The government of Israel is not fighting World War Two, or even a war. It is engaged in periodic skirmishes with a guerrilla force in Lebanon, and it is working to exterminate an unarmed civilian population in Gaza. Neither front requires modern 2,000-pound bombs.
An American-made Mark 84 has a destruction radius of half a mile. It releases a thermal wave the temperature of the surface of the sun. Within 100 feet of the explosion, rock melts and human flesh turns to vapor. The bomb collapses apartment buildings and leaves craters thirty-five feet deep. Until the war with Iran, the US military generally avoided using the Mark 84 in urban areas. It kills too many civilians.
For the Netanyahu government, that’s been the upside. In the weeks after October 7, the IDF dropped nearly six hundred 2,000-pound bombs on densely populated areas in Gaza, including on more than 100 officially designated civilian evacuation zones. The slaughter was so grotesque and embarrassing that for a moment the Biden administration paused a shipment of Mark 84s. Those shipments quickly resumed under Trump. Now they’ve accelerated.
It’s hard to overstate the scale of the crime the Israeli government is committing in Gaza. Over the last three years, more than a quarter-million Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces there. The majority of them have been noncombatants: women, the elderly and tens of thousands of children. Many thousands more remain missing, presumably entombed under the rubble of 200,000 collapsed buildings. So far the Israelis have destroyed 92 percent of all homes in Gaza, and 34 of the 36 hospitals. By comparison, the 1945 Allied bombings of Dresden, now acknowledged as a war crime, destroyed about half of the city’s inhabited buildings.
By any definition, what the Netanyahu government has done in Gaza is genocide. The 40,000 new bombs the Trump administration is sending will be used to do the same in Lebanon, and likely in other countries in the region. If you wanted to extend the Iran war into the indefinite future, this is exactly what you’d do.
So far none of this has received public scrutiny. At some point, inevitably, it will be described in media accounts as an “arms sale.” It is not an arms sale. It is a gift, funded by American taxpayers through the Foreign Military Financing program, an arrangement designed to disguise welfare as capitalism: Congress appropriates money to the executive branch, which transfers the cash to Israel to “buy” American-made weapons, in this case from General Dynamics. Politicians claim this is a win for America. Most voters have no idea they paid for it. The bill in this case is about $3 billion. Add that to the $352 billion the US Treasury has transferred to Israel since 1951.
How did this happen? The request for 40,000 new high-explosive civilian-killing bombs originated at the US Embassy in Jerusalem, which is run by Christian Zionist Ambassador Mike Huckabee and his aide David Milstein, who is the stepson of Fox News host Mark Levin. From there it moved to the State Department, where Marco Rubio enthusiastically approved it.
At this point, only four more people need to sign off before the bombs ship to Israel: Senators Jim Risch and Jeanne Shaheen, the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; and Congressmen Brian Mast and Gregory Meeks, the top two members of the equivalent House committee. All four are committed neocons. Collectively they’ve taken millions from the Israel lobby. In 2015, Brian Mast traveled to Israel to volunteer for the Israeli military. In 2023, Mast showed up in the House of Representatives wearing an IDF uniform.
It’s hard to imagine any of them hesitating before sending more free bombs to Israel. Only public outrage can stop this.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
You can’t help but be moved by the quiet dignity and eloquence of his argument.
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Researchers spent 500 hours and $70,000 and found LG TVs logging plain text transcripts in standby, mapping every device in the house, and feeding it to LG's ad arm
Unplug the internet and it saves the files until you plug back in.
LG says its TVs don't record ambient conversations.
The evidence begs to differ.
216 million of these are sitting in living rooms.
Where are the regulators?
Writer: Daniel
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The findings and video clip here are from Gamers Nexus' investigation, which receives no credit or link.
youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTc…
x.com/gamersnexus/st…
TylerTheHungry retweeted
They said Alberta independence had no plan.
Now it does.
The Alberta Transition Plan, developed with Dennis Kalma and 40+ subject matter experts, lays out the path from province to country.
Watch:
youtube.com/watch?v=9UxQx3z9…
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Holy shit, @OwenBenjamin, that’s insane. Great catch!
TylerTheHungry retweeted
Just a reminder that today, Alberta will send $54,794,520.55 to Ottawa and not receive anything for it. Tomorrow, and every day after that, another $54,794,520.55 will be sent.
Vote Option 2 on October 19th to start the process of ending this.
$20 billion more. Every year.
That's what Alberta sends Ottawa beyond what it gets back.
Option 1 keeps that flowing. Option 2 puts it on the table.
Vote Option 2 on October 19. LetAlbertaDecide.com
TylerTheHungry retweeted
On October 19, Albertans will make an important choice about the future we leave to the next generation.
- Option 1 says carry on as we are.
- Option 2 says we believe Alberta can do better.
This should not be a vote about fear or anger. It should be a vote about confidence—confidence in our people, our resources and our ability to build a more prosperous future.
Vote Option 2. Alberta can do better.