Predict top performers before the offer. High-velocity hiring for teams tired of people who don't stay.
Mississauga, Ontario
Joined May 2020
- Tweets777
- Following457
- Followers192
- Likes102
You need 40 warehouse associates this month. By the time you call the good ones back, they already started somewhere else.
Quits rate in transportation and warehousing: 2.2% a month, against 1.9% economy wide (BLS, July 2026).
hubs.li/Q04xtr2y0
Your offer acceptance rate looks fine. Your schedule is still short.
35% of candidates back out after accepting an offer. Accepting and showing up on day one are two different things, and most teams only count the first.
Read the full article: hubs.li/Q04wh4VB0
An internal recruiter looks cheaper than an agency until you run the math.
BLS median recruiter wage: $72,910. Add benefits, taxes, and tools and it lands near $130K, fixed.
That cost carries whether you hire 5 this month or 25 👇
hubs.li/Q04v-5Xn0
#Hiring #HR
If a front line hire quits in week six, most teams call it retention.
It usually isn't. 82% of managers admit they saw the warning signs in the interview and didn't act (Leadership IQ).
The wrong hire was chosen before day one 👇
hubs.li/Q04tVm5q0
#Hiring #HR
You don't have a candidate problem. You have a calendar problem.
Talent teams spend 38% of their time scheduling interviews. 42% of candidates leave when it drags.
Count the slots before you buy applicants 👇
hubs.li/Q04szvjD0
#Hiring #HR
Your sourcing is fine. Your handoff is not.
Recruiters now handle 93% more applications than in 2021 (Gem, 2026). Under that load, a 36-hour manager review is not a delay. It is a lost candidate.
One owner. One next action. One deadline.
workwolf.com/blog/hiring-han…
Your hiring team is not behind. The system is too small.
Applications per recruiter: 146 in 2022 → 746 in 2025
Recruiters per org: 10.43 → 4.62 (Greenhouse 2026)
More volume. Fewer people. Same roles reopening every month.
Full guide 👇
hubs.li/Q04rk-P20
#Hiring #HR
Hiring 10 people is not a goal. It's a production plan.
Most teams plan for roles. They should plan for starts, then work backward through interviews, screens, and applicants.
Full guide 👇
hubs.li/Q04pvpJp0
#Hiring #HR
Companies obsess over time to fill. Few calculate what an open role costs while they wait.
A $60K role open for 42 days: $10K+ in lost productivity. A failed hire: 10 months of reduced capacity.
Vacancy cost is real. It never shows up on a report 👇
hubs.li/Q04mjZmx0
Front-line interview no-shows can hit 90% in peak season.
It's not a candidate quality problem. It's a slow front-end problem.
What no-shows really cost your hiring budget, and the 4 levers that fix it:
hubs.li/Q04kLKqp0
Replacing a bad hire costs up to 200% of their salary.
46% of new hires fail within 18 months. 89% come down to attitude, not skill.
We built a free guide with the full breakdown and a calculator that shows your number 👇
hubs.li/Q04k3CSV0
#Hiring #HR #Recruitment
A 25% recruiting fee on a $65K hire is $16,250.
The agency gets paid when the candidate signs. Not when the hire succeeds.
Our CEO charged that for years. He just published what the model looks like from the inside.
hubs.li/Q04gF8JH0
#Hiring #Recruitment
You pay 15 to 25% of first year salary. The agency has no stake in whether the hire works out.
That's the contingency model. Here's what it actually costs you at volume.
hubs.li/Q04cb-tT0
#Hiring #Recruitment
Candidates use AI to apply. You use AI to filter. Nobody wins.
Applications per job surged 286% in one year. Here's what actually works now.
hubs.li/Q049SVg70
#Hiring #SkillsBasedHiring
Have you ever calculated what a bad hire actually cost you?
Most companies haven't. The number is more than $60,000 for one mid level hire.
We broke it down.
hubs.li/Q049vd_G0
#Hiring #Recruitment
180 applicants per hire. 97% are noise. 44 days to fill a role.
No software, on its own, was built for this.
We built hiring software. Then our customers asked us to do the hiring for them. Here's what we learned from being on both sides.
hubs.li/Q048jrP30
We started by building hiring software.
Science-backed psychometrics that predict who will succeed, not just who interviews well.
Clients loved it.
Then they asked: “Can you just do the recruiting too?”
So we did.
🐺 New look. Same science.
👉 workwolf.com/
📄 You spend 7 seconds scanning a resume.
🤯 200+ applicants per role.
😬 Still no idea who really fits.
Workwolf fixes that.
✅ Personality fit from day one
✅ Auto-screened traits that match your top talent
✅ Faster, better hiring—no guesswork
🎥 Watch how it works ↓
Workwolf retweeted
Another secure application in the ecosystem ✅
Congrats to @workwolf_ for earning their TAC Security App Security Certificate through #ESOF.
Together, we protect the future. 🔐
#TACSecurity #CyberResilience #SecureApps
Workwolf retweeted
🚀 AI-Powered Hiring for SMBs with Erik Simins 🤖
On the CanadianSME Small Business Podcast, hosted by Kripa Anand, Erik Simins of @workwolf_ shares how AI is transforming hiring for small businesses:
✅ AI & automation in recruitment 💡
✅ Building a trustworthy hiring process 🔒
✅ Small business advantage: faster tech adoption
🎧 Watch the full podcast here: youtu.be/_3x8vFXix4Q
Thank you to our podcast partners: @RBC, @UPS_Canada, and @Google.
Don’t forget to subscribe to the CanadianSME Small Business Magazine for more empowering content: canadiansme.ca
#AI #TalentAcquisition #Recruitment #HRTech #SmallBusiness #Automation #BusinessGrowth #CanadianSME