
make solana great again | CA: ❌ | The platform should exist to grow the $SOL ecosystem and has no reason to have a CA.
solana blockchain
Joined February 2025
- Tweets743
- Following544
- Followers431
- Likes1.6K
Pinned Tweet
It seems Alpha Hunter degens may need a deeper understanding of CAs.
As you know, when creating a token in the $SOL ecosystem, users can pre-generate a CA (Contract Address). This allows them to include desired patterns or words in the address, such as “pump” or “bonk.”
However, obtaining a CA with a custom sequence longer than 5 characters is extremely difficult, requiring significant time and energy. Anything beyond 6 characters has essentially been impossible.
Wizard.fun changes this. Our launchpad allows anyone to generate and trade CAs without creating a token first. This means millions of users can mine CAs freely, and when a rare CA is discovered, developers can purchase it and use it to launch their tokens.
This system places users ahead of developers in the value chain for the first time in the $SOL memecoin ecosystem, while also providing developers with an easier way to acquire rare and meaningful CAs. It represents a true innovation for the Solana ecosystem.
1
5
872
At the very least, platform developers should think about systems that can draw capital into the market.
76
Aren't you tired of following the same old narrative? What if we tried a system that lets you grow based on unchanging trenches for the first time?
3
437
While the SOL ecosystem is drowning in pure noise, Alon is busy swimming in $8B
Pumpfun, the Solana Foundation, and the founders.
What was obvious has now reached the courtroom.
The 5.5 Billion USD RICO Case.
Here is everything summarized that is known so far:
In July 2025, a consolidated class action lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York accusing Pumpfun and the Solana ecosystem of operating a coordinated illegal scheme that allegedly wiped out between 4 and 5.5 billion USD of retail investor capital. The case frames Pumpfun not as a neutral launchpad, but as a deliberately engineered digital casino embedded into Solana’s core infrastructure.
The plaintiffs rely on US securities law, federal RICO statutes, and New York consumer protection law. If successful, the defendants face treble damages under RICO. That would raise potential liability to approximately 16.5 billion USD.
Pumpfun launched in January 2024 and quickly became the dominant memecoin factory on Solana. According to the complaint, the platform generated more than 850 million USD in cumulative fee revenue within roughly 14 months. The mechanism was simple. Anyone could mint and trade tokens without identity verification, disclosures, or risk warnings. Pumpfun charged a 1 percent fee on every transaction.
Between January 2024 and March 2025, users launched more than 7 million tokens. Approximately 98.6 percent of them collapsed to near zero value. Plaintiffs argue that this failure rate was not accidental but intrinsic to the system design, which allegedly maximised churn and fee extraction rather than sustainable markets.
The lawsuit describes Pumpfun as an unlicensed gambling platform where users bet on random price movements without regulatory oversight, disclosures, or consumer protections.
Baton Corporation Ltd., the UK based operator of Pumpfun, is led by three founders in their early 20s. CEO Noah Bernhard Hugo Tweedale is 21.
CTO Dylan Kerler is 21.
COO Alon Cohen is 23. All three are named individually as defendants.
Under Section 15 of the Securities Act, the plaintiffs argue that the founders acted as control persons and knowingly facilitated the sale of unregistered securities. The complaint alleges no SEC registration, no prospectuses, and no meaningful disclosure of risks to retail users.
The original lawsuit filed in January 2025 targeted only Baton Corporation and its founders. The July 2025 consolidated complaint dramatically expanded the scope.
New defendants include Solana Labs, the Solana Foundation, and senior leadership figures such as Anatoly Yakovenko, Raj Gokal, and Solana Foundation president Lily Liu.
The plaintiffs claim that Solana provided not just neutral infrastructure but active technical coordination that enabled Pumpfun’s scale and behaviour. This alleged coordination forms the backbone of the RICO enterprise theory.
The complaint accuses the defendants of forming a criminal enterprise referred to as the Pump Enterprise. Alleged predicate acts include wire fraud, securities fraud, unlicensed money transmission, and facilitation of illegal gambling.
RICO was originally designed to combat organised crime. Its application here signals that the plaintiffs view the memecoin economy not as a regulatory grey area but as systemic financial exploitation.
A key escalation occurred in September 2025. Plaintiffs obtained more than 5000 internal chat messages from a confidential informant. According to court filings, these logs allegedly document direct communication between Solana Labs engineers and Pumpfun personnel.
The discussions reportedly cover token program behaviour, validator mechanics, priority inclusion paths, and launch flow design. Plaintiffs argue this proves intentional coordination rather than passive infrastructure provision.
Shortly after these logs surfaced, Jito Labs and the Jito Foundation were voluntarily dismissed from the case without settlement. The court confirmed no compensation or concessions were exchanged. The plaintiffs stated they were narrowing the case to focus on Pumpfun and Solana.
Court decision in December 2025:
On December 16 2025, Judge Colleen McMahon granted the plaintiffs permission to file a second amended complaint. This allows them to restructure their allegations using the leaked communications and to further detail how the platform architecture allegedly prioritised extraction over fairness.
The deadline to file the amended complaint is December 19 2025. Defendants must respond with motions to dismiss by January 23 2026. Plaintiffs must reply by February 13 2026.
If the amended complaint survives dismissal, the case becomes one of the most consequential enforcement actions ever aimed at crypto infrastructure rather than individual tokens.
Beyond RICO, the lawsuit argues that Pumpfun tokens qualify as securities under the Howey test. Plaintiffs claim users invested money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profit driven by the platform’s marketing, visibility mechanics, and network effects.
They allege violations of Sections 5a and 5c of the Securities Act due to the sale of unregistered securities. Additional claims include deceptive business practices under New York General Business Law Sections 349 and 350 and unjust enrichment.
This lawsuit directly challenges the long held assumption that blockchain infrastructure providers are analogous to neutral hosting services. If the court accepts the plaintiffs’ theory, blockchain foundations and protocol developers could face liability for downstream economic activity enabled by their systems.
For Solana, the stakes are existential. Beyond financial exposure, the case threatens its reputation as a leading Layer 1 network. More broadly, it could redefine legal responsibility across memecoin platforms, launchpads, and high throughput blockchains.
At the same time, the outcome is uncertain. Recent rulings in cases involving Ripple and Coinbase have narrowed the application of securities law to secondary market transactions. Regulatory enforcement by the SEC has also slowed under the current administration.
This case sits at the intersection of infrastructure design, behavioural finance, and systemic risk. Regardless of outcome, it marks a turning point in how memecoin economies are legally and morally evaluated.
Let’s see what happens. What are your thoughts on this?
2
183
The only reason he’s been so quiet is because he’s building a user-extraction tool far more powerful than Mayhem.
Pumpdotfun & Solana lawsuit update:
Leave to amend (file new complaint) GRANTED
“What appeared to be a fair, automated marketplace was, Plaintiffs say, structurally tilted to extract value from ordinary users while rewarding those with privileged access to Solana's infrastructure and Jito Lab's transaction ordering tools.”
1
3
195
The narrative in the crypto market changes too quickly, and memecoins that cannot maintain momentum for even a few hours make it impossible for larger whales to participate.
To address this, a memecoin needs the flexibility to adapt and remain relevant to whatever narrative emerges.
🤖 Made with AI
4
181
I might add the CA of the token that will solve the problems of the $SOL trenches to my bio.
3
93
To survive in the Solana trenches, become a developer. This does not mean you need to learn development, it means you must understand their strategy to avoid getting caught off guard.
4
131
Please do not wait for narratives or be dragged around by them anymore.
A $SOL memecoin that can always fit into any narrative will be revealed soon.
1
65
I want to release a $SOL memecoin system for Trench to end this hell quickly.
1
3
118
Is the $SOL memecoin trench warfare truly a fair game in which everyone participates equally?
Pump fun extracted 8 billion dollars from the ecosystem as a reward for creating this trench warfare, and now it is allowing the ecosystem to be used as a tool for liquidity extraction.
Innovation is needed.
1
108
Well-known platform tokens are often targeted. In a way, it may actually be fortunate that our platform is not widely known yet, because it gives us the chance to create a meme that can bring real innovation.
1
107
Hope still exists within the $SOL ecosystem.
Of course, the situation will not improve quickly, as major platforms show little interest in creating that hope.
However, a platform or project that truly brings this hope to life will certainly emerge.
2
82
Saying that no more launchpads are needed means that launchpads without innovation no longer hold any real value.
The SOL ecosystem is always waiting for something new that can create better and more meaningful innovation.
3
111



















