Joined March 2014
William Fike retweeted
Replying to @yvessirae
Because most people understand she’s a whore. Not really that interesting.
22
41
1
5,434
123,594
William Fike retweeted
Why am I not seeing anything about Jane Doe and the Cornell 7 rapists anymore??
1,181
3,850
108
45,463
2,293,048
Because her own texts disproved the entire case And now the entire world knows she's not only a whore but a pathological liar
Why am I not seeing anything about Jane Doe and the Cornell 7 rapists anymore??
37
737
1
14,748
98,905
William Fike retweeted
BARIS: Trump’s endorsement of Netanyahu, while Netanyahu keeps saying there’s a war to finish, is only reinforcing the perception that Rs are captured by the Israel lobby. That’s the narrative propelling Brown in OH, Ossoff in GA, and Cooper in NC. They won’t release the Epstein files. They’re fighting a war voters didn’t want, for the lobby. They don’t give a damn about the little guy. And they let Netanyahu say it not once, not twice, but THREE TIMES. Ds haven’t inflicted these wounds on Rs or Trump. They’ve inflicted them on themselves, over and over again.
13
40
2
179
4,282
William Fike retweeted
Thomas Massie: The Epstein scandal is “deeper and darker” than anyone imagined. “It’s bigger than Watergate.” “It’s not about Joe Biden or Donald Trump.” “There are degrees of evil here that we’ve never seen at this scale … ” “Our government was compromised by wealthy, connected billionaires, and by Jeffrey Epstein himself.” “At the age of 14, these girls that were being sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein were told if they could go find another girl to take their place, then they wouldn’t have to be sexually abused.” “And some of them took that deal.” “It’s one thing to be evil to a child.” “It’s another thing to get a child to do evil.”
120
1,872
59
6,183
148,513
If it’s demonstrably false they’re crooked lawyers should also be disbarred. Cause there’s always going to be a snake who would take the case if there’s no risk
1
53
1,615
William Fike retweeted
The false accuser still works at MIT.
2
5
50
1,859
William Fike retweeted
The accuser, if proven to be lying beyond reasonable doubt, should face the penalty the accused would have faced if found guilty. Not difficult.
1
1
19
293
William Fike retweeted
Replying to @BostonGlobe
Women that lie need to start facing severe consequences. 10 years in jail minimum for lying.
12
72
4
3,764
77,689
Replying to @BostonGlobe
— This is the Amber Heard type who destroyed David Sabatini’s life and career. He may have gotten a big judgment against her from the jury, but he will likely have to fight to see even a penny of it. Meanwhile she gets to continue her illustrious career at MIT as a prof with her own lab. Disgusting.
12
80
5
872
37,968
William Fike retweeted
A civil jury ruled in favor of ex-MIT scientist David Sabatini, who was accused by a younger colleague of inappropriate sexual conduct in his Cambridge research lab, and awarded him $6 million in damages. trib.al/s3v9VIX
206
692
145
7,640
1,999,519
William Fike retweeted
Dear President Kornbluth and Chairman Gorenberg, Yesterday, as I am sure you are aware, a Boston jury unanimously found that @MIT professor Kristin Knouse defamed David Sabatini, falsely accused him of rape and sexual harassment, and tortuously interfered with his contractual arrangements including his tenure at MIT. MIT and its tenure review committee relied on Professor Knouse’s statements when it took away David’s tenure and terminated him. MIT's policies explicitly prohibit harassment, retaliation, and fabrication of claims. Falsely accusing a colleague of rape and sexual harassment and pushing for his termination under false pretenses are clearly violations of MIT policy. In light of the unanimous findings of the jury after five years of discovery, many legal motions and countermotions by both parties, and a three-week trial in Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston: Is MIT going to take away Knouse’s tenure and terminate her? If not, why not? Is MIT going to restore David’s tenure, and apologize for firing him? If not, why not? In light of what has transpired in this grave miscarriage of justice, MIT has the opportunity and the obligation to right a serious wrong here. At a minimum, the public deserves transparency into what actions MIT is taking in this case as taxpayers are major funders of MIT. Sincerely, Bill Ackman
A civil jury ruled in favor of ex-MIT scientist David Sabatini, who was accused by a younger colleague of inappropriate sexual conduct in his Cambridge research lab, and awarded him $6 million in damages. trib.al/s3v9VIX
235
2,335
47
15,464
600,359
William Fike retweeted
The case of Professor David Sabatini stands as one of the most egregious examples of woke institutional excess, and its fallout extended far beyond the destruction of a single career. At the Whitehead Institute at MIT, he ran a roughly 40-person lab conducting important work in molecular biology and cell signaling. That research was abruptly terminated, costing numerous students and trainees their ongoing projects and career momentum and resulting in an untold loss of medically significant knowledge - knowledge that had been funded by the public’s taxpayer dollars. All of that was abruptly canceled when a false accusation of sexual impropriety was taken up by MIT's DEI-infected bureaucracy and a director who was on a feminist crusade to purge a leading scientist for what appears to be the crime of being a white male. The court found that the relationship was consensual and the accusations that destroyed his career came only after he ended it and moved on romantically - buyer's remorse, in other words. After five years of litigation, discovery and trial, a Boston jury has just awarded Professor David Sabatini $6 million in his defamation case against Kristin Knouse, finding that she defamed him and interfered with his career. The jury also rejected her counterclaims of coercion, harassment, and a hostile work environment. But all of this is just the first step. Many people who were involved need to be held accountable. The institutions must make this right. MIT, Whitehead, and HHMI still have questions to answer about their own handling. Investigations must look into the director of Whitehead who perpetrated this witch hunt. @NIH and @NSF should now act on the jury’s findings. Restore @DMSabatini's eligibility for federal grants. The institutional investigations that led to his removal and the later debarment effort were based on claims that a jury has now rejected as defamatory. There is no more reason to treat him as radioactive. And last but not least, bless you, @BillAckman. When almost no one in science, academia, or media would touch this case, you acted and supported him, funding his new lab so that his important work on mTOR could continue. Thank you and Dafna at NYU for standing up publicly for due process when it was so costly. I knew many of his students and colleagues who could not speak out in support of him out of fear of retribution and professional ruin. Prof. Sabatini has said that you saved his life. It is not a hyperbolic statement. Also, for every one of him, there are other men whose lives have been ruined this way. For things to change, high costs on the accuser must be imposed. cc @DrJBhattacharya @regardthefrost
Dear President Kornbluth and Chairman Gorenberg, Yesterday, as I am sure you are aware, a Boston jury unanimously found that @MIT professor Kristin Knouse defamed David Sabatini, falsely accused him of rape and sexual harassment, and tortuously interfered with his contractual arrangements including his tenure at MIT. MIT and its tenure review committee relied on Professor Knouse’s statements when it took away David’s tenure and terminated him. MIT's policies explicitly prohibit harassment, retaliation, and fabrication of claims. Falsely accusing a colleague of rape and sexual harassment and pushing for his termination under false pretenses are clearly violations of MIT policy. In light of the unanimous findings of the jury after five years of discovery, many legal motions and countermotions by both parties, and a three-week trial in Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston: Is MIT going to take away Knouse’s tenure and terminate her? If not, why not? Is MIT going to restore David’s tenure, and apologize for firing him? If not, why not? In light of what has transpired in this grave miscarriage of justice, MIT has the opportunity and the obligation to right a serious wrong here. At a minimum, the public deserves transparency into what actions MIT is taking in this case as taxpayers are major funders of MIT. Sincerely, Bill Ackman
29
217
8
1,975
90,939
Imagine your grandchildren in the cities your ancestors built. Calls to prayer echo, churches become mosques, founders’ names vanish from street signs. Your HOA banned barbecues because meat offends neighbors. Jobs offshored, cheap labor imported, mass migration called compassion. Defending American identity called racist. Your ancestors fought wars, built towns and buried their dead here to leave you a nation. When your grandchildren ask what happened, will you admit you were more afraid of being called racist than losing their inheritance? They left you a nation. You left them an excuse. Nationalism for thee, but not for me.
2
23
221
1,791
William Fike retweeted
There are roughly the same number of American tech graduates each year as there are STEM jobs that go to foreigners. Grads like Mr. Weis do everything they’re told, only to be replaced. Shortages are a myth. There are only employers that don’t want to hire American.
Jack Weis has applied to more than 2,300 jobs since he graduated from Princeton in 2024 with his Ph.D. in chemical engineering. He still doesn’t have a job. on.wsj.com/4sfxSLc
36
101
4
530
16,908
William Fike retweeted
And that’s the problem. #Epstein #IranWar #Genocide
TRUMP: "I've been the best president in the history of Israel."
684
7,975
120
51,462
470,728
William Fike retweeted
The Smithsonian claims DNA proves Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings’ children. Again. The 1998 study only showed “some Jefferson male,” and it dropped weeks before Clinton’s impeachment. This study isn’t even peer reviewed, but the book and documentary are already planned.
89
199
6
1,714
65,732
Mark Levin says politicians are judged if they are friends with Tucker Carlson. I judge politicians if they are friends with Mark Levin and agree with his insane murderous demands of politicians. Also I’m friends with Tucker. Judge me all you want. I don’t care 😂
If the VP wants to remain friends with Carlson, an individual who is thoroughly evil and full of hate for our country, for millions of Christians and, of course, Jews, and who is openly and publicly diabolical with his selection of guests and messaging, not to mention has made the most vile personal attacks against our president, then the VP will have to run for the GOP nomination with that anchor around his neck.  He will have to defend it over and over again, as will his most vocal supporters.  Should he receive the nomination, it will only get worse.  But it's up to him.  President Trump made his decision long ago, and publicly condemned Carlson.  It's not about loyalty.  It's about right versus wrong and on what basis friendships are built.  Yes, the VP will be judged, at least in part, by his very close association with Carlson, as all politicians are examined.  To be clear, most Americans do not tolerate the kind of shockingly radical and evil views held by Carlson.  They certainly do not befriend such people.  The likes of Carlson are not new to our politics.
562
596
21
5,964
106,603
William Fike retweeted
Replying to @WSJ
@wsj Maybe you guys should have spoken up for White men years ago when they were being discriminated against in literally every institution and corporation. Hundreds of billions of dollars of profit wasted because they locked White men out of careers. And you all said nothing.
6
8
240
11,069
William Fike retweeted
Replying to @WSJ
He is the wrong race and gender to get a job. We need a fucking revolution.
19
17
1
920
28,318