SD (@whyfud) profile picture

Building things

Joined January 2022
Photo by SD (@whyfud)Photo by SD (@whyfud)Photo by SD (@whyfud)Photo by SD (@whyfud)Photo by SD (@whyfud)
Oyun sektöründe de durum bu. Türk oyun şirketi Fart Together adında bir oyun geliştiriyor ve steam’de demo olarak yayınlıyor. Oyun ilgi görüyor ve henüz kendileri yayınlanmamasına rağmen hem Android hem de iOS için bir çok klonu oluşturulup yayınlanıyor. Klon yayınlamak bu kadar kolay olmamalı. Kendileri yayınlamak istese 1 ton reject alırlar.
66
52
30
734
116,521
Meta ad performance has been the best it's ever been for us since late July, we have more than 2.5x'd the ad account while decreasing CAC Something was changed precisely on September 13th and has not recovered since Our performance (volume, CPA) since the 13th is only off by a couple of % but spending patterns are very odd There are now hours of the day that get $100-$200 of spend and our "power hours" are extremely concentrated at night now with like 50% of our daily budget being spent in a 3-4 hour window There are also days where we spend 50% of our daily budget by 11am ET and do not spend anything during our regular power hours. As well as days that spend less than half of our daily budget and other days that spend 150% of it, though it nets out on the rolling 7day. We've not touched the ad account other than adding new creatives in for at least over a month and don't plan to adjust anything because of this, but that at least tells me it's more than likely meta pushed some update vs. us screwing something up in acct.
While Meta is rocking on Muse, Meta ad performance has been pretty awful lately. So if you're banging your head against the wall wondering if it's just you, it's not.
22
3
1
151
21,791
So basically if you create an insta page for your app you have a 99% chance of getting hit with the ban wave now lmaoooo
31
3
3
196
60,109
At one point in a man's life, everything goes wrong, everyone leaves, and all he can do is spend time alone to fix himself.
38
435
11
1,937
38,711
By 2027, 99% of SaaS products will be dead. and 99% of new AiaaS will be here in 2027.
60
6
2
153
7,533
I will be rich and successful without sacrificing my authenticity or I will die trying
15
108
15
555
42,981
this is nuts! Mark Cuban just said something every young person should hear. AI agents are GOING to run through every small and mid-size business in the country. not a single one of those owners will know how to build them. his advice is to learn claude. learn agentic workflows. just learn AI and how it works. then go to these businesses and help them because they won’t know how to do any of this shit. they have money to spend. they have deep problems. they don’t have you!
334
744
94
8,214
1,437,846
Hot take: People who wake up after 10am are more productive than the “5AM club”. Change my mind :)
81
3
162
7,327
it's officially that point in ramadan where hunger is no longer the test, it's no sleep
75
7,198
501
39,983
707,455
Don't Fucking quit, bro. I'm begging you. Life can go from 0 to 100 really quick.
63
1
72
6,559
18 months ago, I had $9.50 in my bank account Today we announced that Cal AI was acquired by MyFitnessPal Life can flip faster than you think. Keep going
205
201
29
5,312
613,438
Box3: Ook @VVD stemde voor belasting op vermogensaanwas in plaats van vermogenswinst. Belasting betalen over rendement dat alleen op papier bestaat. Geld betalen dat je niet in je zak hebt. It's Fugazi, it's fake. It's a wazi, it's a wuzi, it's fairy dust, it doesn't exist, it has never landed, it's not on the elementary chart. IT'S NOT FUCKING REAL! Het is onteigening. #VVD moet naar nul (0) zetels. Het is de partij de alles belooft, maar dit hele land afbreekt. #YouWillOwnNothingAndYouWillBeHappy #Communisme #Box3
“Box 3 is simpel. Tot iemand het uitlegt. Dan is het ineens wiskunde met gevoelens.” @eelcoheinen @DilanYesilgoz #box3 #belasting #vvd #politiek
94
480
17
2,200
97,096
Wie gaat er in aandelen (in bedrijven) investeren (met geld waarover al belasting is betaald!) als je 36% over een fictief rendement moet aftikken? Het wordt een grote kapitaalvlucht naar het buitenland. Stop de sloop van NL! Dit is diefstal! @D66 @VVD @cdavandaag #onfatsoenlijk
40
112
4
634
16,128
20k retweets plus 1000 compliments for me under this thread and I give this random guy 1million. You can talk about how handsome rich sexy and funny I am. Bots ignored. Luis, I don’t know you - let’s see if your fellow man wants your life to change.
Replying to @Cobratate
Give me 1 million then I would appreciate it
2,211
17,462
714
22,147
2,875,539
Rainbow fish to a billy ngl
Creator fees need change. When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success. Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD). However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform. While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer. Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform. Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk. Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc. So, to summarize our analysis: - Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects - Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX - Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading. Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used. There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.
22
6
3
100
11,677
First day back Alon makes a tweet and mentions 2 coins white whale over 100m $FISH under 10m you had your entry gg bye bye
163
65
9
401
94,183
Alon came back and the first thing he did was shill $WhiteWhale and $FISH 👀
88
76
2
325
20,120
I can bet money that $fish is going to be the first coin with the new fixed dev fees. In this tweet he talks about the issue of faking the creator being on board. Well fish already has it, and pumpfun has shown numerous times they like the token. Simply a waiting game at this point. $fish higher
1
7
50
2,470
$fish mentioned
Creator fees need change. When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success. Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD). However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform. While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer. Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform. Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk. Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc. So, to summarize our analysis: - Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects - Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX - Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading. Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used. There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.
5
34
1,337
A man married for 8 years: Sex went from daily to duty, then to special occasions. The husband hits the gym, makes more money, but he still gets rejected. Wife wonders why he’s distant. Man got himself a new chick.
226
870
29
16,736
2,570,365