Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw) header
Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw) profile picture
Joined March 2020
Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)Photo by Weiting Chen (@weitingchentw)
Modern pomodoro be like
4
12
478
Is "have you asked [insert your favorite AI model]?" the new "have you Googled it?" at work?
2
7
423
lmao wtf loooooooooooooool
2
8
557
It's crazy that on Twitter you can still see the ads from a person you've 1) muted and 2) blocked. Like how is this possible?
1
11
332
Tried n8n out of curiosity, realized it would've been faster to just ask AI to write and deploy the code for me. Am I the only one here?
1
2
221
SpaceX acquired xAI No one: Elon: Let's show a 🚀 animation after clicking like button on X
5
4
252
I find MrBeast cringe and muted his channel years ago. Knew he was big, but didn't realize HOW big until my gf's nephew (in kindergarten) asked his mom to pull up YouTube specifically for MrBeast videos in auto-dub. Dude gets global distribution indeed.
The lads break down Tom Lee's $200M bet on MrBeast as an infrastructure play for Ethereum distribution. "This is an onboarding flywheel that could spur customer acquisition for DeFi apps on Ethereum."
1
2
239
Weiting Chen retweeted
this whole aave situation makes me sad actually one of the best projects in crypto extremely stable, real pmf, clear category winner the first thing i recommend to non degen people it should be the default token for non degen investors too but somehow… yeah
79
14
8
459
53,443
We used to hold a sizeable position in LDO, supported them through the years of staking centralisation FUD, and believe they are good actors within Ethereum But this is mindboggling Who are these 4 entities/committees? Why does a 500m FDV crypto startup need 4? And why are 3 of them proposing the 4th one to spend 12% of LDOs FDV in a year to "explore several small bets and one big bet"? Aaaa, what does it even mean? What is actually going on? This reminds me of Polkadot and its governance capture (many such cases actually)...please lose the Europarliament LARP fantasy and start acting like a startup that needs to run lean and laser focus, market is telling you all you need to know about your governance and direction Yours, probably not most well informed but genuinely well meaning ex-bagholder
Replying to @0xsmac
"This submission is presented to the Lido DAO by the Lido Labs Foundation in collaboration with the Lido Ecosystem Foundation and the Lido Alliance BORG." "The goal is to build an internal venture culture with a framework where small autonomous teams can pitch ideas, secure “seed” allocations, launch MVPs, and measure outcomes transparently. Validated products graduate into larger lines of business. This process will turn Lido into a venture machine continuously discovering and scaling new growth engines while keeping risk contained." "Lido Labs will explore a potential Big Bet, a major expansion with billion-dollar revenue potential in real-business applications. The principle is patience and precision: no early large commitment of resources until a clear strategic wedge and credible path to dominance are identified." Why is a 500M FDV crypto project talking like a European Committee For Future Accelerators Actually nvm
20
2
8
149
32,306
Walking on a big ass road in downtown Vancouver: Random guy following: 🎶 ching chong ching chong ching chong 🎶 Didn't have that on my Vancouver wish list. 🤷‍♂️
1
5
307
We're getting Gears on PlayStation before we get Gears on Netflix or in theaters. What universe is this?
Gears of War's PS5 Pro mode improves shadow and reflections quality, multiplayer framerate, and more. Save 25% now: play.st/4o2vrIu
3
480
Did Ethena Really Depeg? I’ve seen a lot of chatter about the Ethena depeg during the market mayhem this weekend. The story is that USDe briefly depegged to ~68c before recovering. Here’s the Binance chart everyone is quoting: But digging into the data and talking to a bunch of folks over last couple days, it's now clear this story is not correct. USDe did *not* depeg. First thing to understand about USDe: its most liquid venue is actually not on exchanges, it’s on Curve. There’s hundreds of millions of dollars of standing liquidity on Curve, while only tens of millions on any given exchange, including Binance. So if you just look at that chart of USDe on Binance, it looks like USDe depegged. But if you superimpose the other liquid venues for USDe, you get a different picture: We see here that while USDe wicked down on every CEX, it did not do so uniformly. Bybit briefly hit $0.95 then quickly recovered, yet Binance depegged a crazy amount and took forever to regain the peg. Curve meanwhile dipped a mere 0.3%. What explains this difference? Remember, every single exchange was under immense load on that day—it was the single largest liquidation event in crypto history. Binance was extremely unstable during this period, causing MMs to be unable to shift inventory because APIs were failing and withdrawals and deposits were bricked. Nobody was able to step in and arb. It’s like a fire broke out on Binance, but all of the roads were blocked and firefighters couldn’t make their way in. This caused a wildfire to break out on Binance, but pretty much everywhere else, that fire was immediately put out by bridging liquidity. (As Guy shows in his post, USDC also depegged a few cents temporarily on Binance due to the same general instability issues—liquidity just couldn’t get ferried in, but this wasn’t a depeg event for USDC either.) So OK. Unsurprising that while there’s API instability, prices on exchanges are wildly different because nobody can get inventory in. But why did it decline so much deeper on Binance than on Bybit? The answer is twofold—first, Binance did not have any primary dealer relationship with Ethena to be able to directly mint and redeem on-platform (Bybit and other exchanges have this integrated) which allows MMs to stay on-platform and still perform peg arbitrage. This is huge, as otherwise an MM has to take their money *out* of Binance, go do the Ethena peg arb, and then bring back their inventory. Nobody was doing that in a moment of crisis when APIs were failing (plus so many other coins were cratering). Second, Binance had their oracle poorly implemented and started liquidating positions they shouldn’t have—good liquidation mechanisms don’t trigger on flash crashes. If you are not the primary venue for an asset (which Binance is not for USDe) then you should look at the price on the primary venue. If you are only looking at your own order book, you will liquidate too aggressively. This caused Binance to start liquidating USDe as though it was worth $0.80 or whatever, which caused a cascade. This is a big part of the reason why Binance is refunding people who were liquidated on USDe (other exchanges AFAIK are not doing so)—they messed up by only looking at their own price instead of the true external price. So this was a Binance-specific flash crash, which better market structure could’ve prevented. USDe on its primary venue, Curve, was actually trading at a tight peg the entire day. This is really different from what you’d describe as a depeg. If you remember USDC in 2023 during the banking crisis, this is what an actual depeg looks like: During the banking crisis, USDC traded down on every single venue. There was *no* place where you could buy USDC for $1. Redemptions were literally halted, so $0.87 was the *true* price. That’s what a depeg means. This instead was a Binance-specific dislocation. It’s a big lesson for market infra, but critical to understand the nuance here if you are trying to draw inferences about USDe’s mechanism from this weekend. USDe was fully collateralized and worth $1 on its primary venue through the entire episode and actually increased its backing collateral over the weekend due to the price action. That said, this kind of market instability is ultimately good because it exposes lessons for the whole industry. Guy’s post below lays out how any exchange, including Binance, can avoid this kind of issue in the future. TL;DR: USDe did not depeg, Binance did.
While we share these suggestions privately with any partner we work with across both DeFi and CeFi, want to surface this publicly so there is zero doubt going forward on what we view as appropriate oracle design and risk management for USDe:
200
282
153
1,428
831,114
Tried to buy some @yieldbasis's $YB on @krakenfx and got hit with this. 5 mins gone All sold out Rekt
3
1
2
593
I also have an article with a section explaining how @TermMaxFi's Smart Unwind works. See the excerpt below. Or read the entire thing 👇 weitingchen.co/multi-role-to…
Some high-level explanations for @TermMaxFi V2 * recommended to watch at 2x speed
3
294
Some high-level explanations for @TermMaxFi V2 * recommended to watch at 2x speed
Introducing 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗠𝗮𝘅 𝗩𝟮 - 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝘅𝗲𝗱-𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗙𝗶 blog.ts.finance/termmax-v2 1/11
3
2
3
15
2,371
Ah and yes, that's a @FightersPR jersey and a tablet from @remarkablepaper
114
Weiting Chen retweeted
I use impersonator.xyz/ pretty often to see how a protocol's website looks to a user with a certain balance/stake (e.g. a whale) But you can also use it to impersonate contracts (e.g. a Treasury) and see how much a protocol has staked on other protocols like Aave, its borrow/repay transactions, etc Thanks @apoorveth for building it
3
2
17
2,118
Is it only me, or does EtherFi's card review process take forever? I got my virtual card from @Exa_App in like seconds😕
2
3
653
sheesh can't wait to get mine.
We're really proud to show off the final design for @Pebble Time 2*! It's quite a bit sleeker and imo more awesome looking than the original design for Core Time 2 we showed off in March. I hope you like it!
2
271