Jo.D. retweeted
KING COUNTY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY VOTES TO BAN GOVERNMENTAL USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION!!!!
A huge huge victory -- kudos to @jovialjoy @timnitGebru @rajiinio @Combsthepoet @culturejedi @fightfortheftr @mediajustice and everybody else who's worked on this issue over the years!!!!
Jo.D. retweeted
Jodi Masters-Gonzales (@webvoice) researcher in AI Ethis and Public Policy, independent auditor of AI systems. Strongly opposes removes opting out of automated decision making.
Jo.D. retweeted
But although you wouldn't know it from @privacypros story, women also commented.
@webvoice highlighted ADPPAs lack of the right to opt-out of automated decision systems -- a clear weakening of CPRA that board member @VinhcentLe also mentioned.
Jo.D. retweeted
Let's take a look back and hear from Mia Shah-Dand (CEO - Lighthouse3, Founder - Women in AI Ethics) about how everything had started and what pushes her to keep continuing a legacy for others to follow. #WomeninAIEthics #AIchangemakers [buff.ly/3BUH7YV ]
Jo.D. retweeted
Hey @datacollab is there a way to join the community without having to use SSO from LinkedIn, Google, or Microsoft? 👀 #privacymatters #accessnotcopies #DataProtection
Jo.D. retweeted
This Center for Inclusive Change report illuminates how a few US states are taking action to regulate #AI —and which states are falling short. Silicon Valley's fail-forward fast #TechCulture is an example of active risk-taking...
inclusivechange.org/ai-gover…
Jo.D. retweeted
Don't miss out on these phenomenal speakers and insightful sessions! #IAmTheFutureOfAI
Register ➡️ eventbrite.com/e/women-in-ai…
@safiyanoble @michebox @reneewittemyer @MicheleJawando @hessiejones @MiaD @webvoice @tulsiparida @teemu_roos @Ebitie
ALT Promotional image for the Women in AI Ethics Mid-Year Summit - 2022. June 8th, 8AM-12PM PT/11AM-3PM ET. #IAmTheFutureOfAI sponsored by the Ford Foundation and the Omidyar Network. Images of 6 speakers, Safiya Noble, Michelle Shevin, Renee Wittemyer, Michelle Jawando, Hessie Jones, and Amy Chou.
Jo.D. retweeted
Daily reminder that your brain on Twitter is being hijacked by an algorithm designed to do one thing: maximise engagement. And the most efficient way to do that is through anger.
Jo.D. retweeted
Join us on June 8 for our mid-year *virtual* WAIE summit where we will highlight diverse careers pathways and share how you too can be part of the ethical AI revolution! #IAmTheFutureOfAI eventbrite.com/e/women-in-ai… @MiaD @hessiejones @michebox @MicheleJawando @reneewittemyer
Jo.D. retweeted
You: I'd like to see my tax docs
IRS: ok scan your face
You: um wat
IRS: scan it using @IDme
You: who ... wait what now?
IRS: don't worry about it
You: I have questions
@IDme: *lying sounds*
You: ... NOPE *signs petition* ⬇️
youtu.be/vcE2JYWbSfI
Jo.D. retweeted
The big question here: why not have multiple forms of authentication? How can we be REQUIRED to SOLELY access our public services via facial recognition...
Jo.D. retweeted
Hall told The Post that the company wanted to “create a ubiquitous ID network” and thought it was a “fundamental problem that digital identity is in the hands of two advertising companies, Facebook and Google.”
Jo.D. retweeted
"ID.me licenses its software from two companies that are “best of breed”: Paravision, for one-to-one matching, and iProov, for detecting whether the face on a video is real or a mask." >> So data will be shared w/ at least 3 non-gov entities.. how many? We DK
Jo.D. retweeted
"Advocates also have warned that the technical demands of an Internet-connected video camera can unfairly burden the millions of Americans with spotty online access or old phones."
Jo.D. retweeted
"Critics say there’s a big difference between a person deciding to use software, which locks their face data on their phone, and being required to send it to a company that retains control of the data for years."
Jo.D. retweeted
"Though people can ask ID.me to delete their biometric data, the company is required to store the data for at least seven years in keeping with federal auditing rules, an IRS filing shows."
Jo.D. retweeted
"The company’s privacy policy says it can use people’s sensitive or personally identifiable information to 'cooperate with law enforcement activities,'"