
In previous lives: Director at @boomweb // Marketing Director @TheDigitalMaze // Co-creator of @DrinkDigitalUK // Described by @mrjamesob as 'very sweary'
Malaga and Nottingham
Joined February 2010
- Tweets30.3K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes22.1K
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Before you report an unconfirmed Google update or panic over a major drop in your rank tracker: check if you were served a poisoned SERP.
An interesting new study from @nozzleio looked at 27.5M SERPs across 49 countries and found Google has started actively poisoning results served to scrapers.
Instead of blocking requests with 429s or CAPTCHAs (which just tells scrapers to rotate IPs and retry), Google serves a fully rendered, completely normal-looking SERP.
What this is resulting in is that the organic results are quietly swapped out with irrelevant data.
Some key observations from the study:
• 8% of all SERPs were poisoned post-Sept 13 (peaking at ~27% between Sept 27–29)
• Organic results kept only ~21% of their usual sites (vs. 88% normal)
• Tracked client sites fell out of the top 10 on 58.6% of poisoned SERPs
• Social sites like Reddit (+8 pts), Facebook (+5.5 pts), and LinkedIn surged to fill the gaps
• Interestingly, paid modules (Ads and Shopping) remained almost completely intact, while AI Overviews and PAA dropped significantly
• Desktop pagination was heavily truncated (stopping at page 4 or earlier on deep queries)
This is essentially Google's countermeasure against automated AI scrapers and RAG grounding pipelines, but rank trackers are inevitably being impacted.
If your client's ranking report shows a significant decline overnight, check GSC average position first. If GSC hasn't displayed a major deviation, it is likely that it is a data anomaly rather than a change in your ranking
Read the full write-up and data: nozzle.io/research/poisoned-…
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
The wait’s almost over. Nottingham DM is coming soon!
We’re happy to be returning to our fantastic venue, Canalhouse, with two expert speakers (Wayne Barker and Sophie Penny), lots of space to chat and some Halloween treats.
Prediction: the next massive Google update is around the corner // lilyraynyc.substack.com/p/pr…
Why we don't do prompt tracking // dejan.ai/blog/prompt-trackin…
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Are SEOs actually scared AI will take their jobs?
Rather than guess, I want data.
I’m surveying SEO/search professionals about AI, job security, career anxiety, and how sentiment has changed over the past year.
6 questions. <5 minutes. Anonymous.
Take it + please RT with your network.
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Nothing is on Fire at Google // theinference.io/p/nothing-is…
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Since Google officially updated its docs on creating Helpful Content, lots of folks are talking about "Effort" (along with scaled content + fake author profiles - good!)
Google’s definition of Effort isn’t what most people think
Effort ≠ work
In the age of low-effort, scaled AI content getting algorithmically decimated, understanding “high-effort” is increasingly relevant to brands.
Most interestingly, the Google API leak exposed two data points that specifically reference Effort scoring:
1) contentEffort - LLM-based effort estimation for article pages
2) ugcDiscussionEffortScore - UGC page quality signals
Effort is not how much work you actually put into a page. It’s more about the evidence of useful work that ends up on the final page.
High-effort pages typically contain at least some elements that AI or automation can’t easily replicate, such as original facts (gained through your own experience) and unique perspectives/opinions.
I put all of this in a Substack recently, along with a template for auditing Content Effort
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Nottingham DM is coming back for round 7 and this time, we’re getting spooky 👻
We have two fantastic speakers lined up: Wayne Barker and Sophie Penny!
📅 Tuesday 27th October, 6pm
📍 Canalhouse, Nottingham
The Generative AI Report Sucks - Let’s Make It Brilliant // leadershipinseo.com/p/the-ge…
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
AEO is still very early!
@viperchill tracked 70k AI responses in Google/ChatGPT and found:
- 0.3% chance of the same brand list repeating next day
- Core brands only changed 11-13% of the time
- Long tail brands changed 65-78% of the time
ChatGPT returned ~6 brands per prompt, AI Overviews averaged 5.1. The core brands listed were typically 1-2 names and about half of ChatGPT prompts had no core brands at all.
ChatGPT leaned on directories (Clutch, Capterra, G2), while AI Overviews leaned on YouTube and Reddit.
If this doesn't motivate you to do technical SEO and AEO I don't know what will.
Make sure you deep dive into the article and data. Glen is one of the best researchers in the space so give him a follow.
detailed.com/ai-volatility/
New research: I analyzed 70K+ AI responses over 4 weeks to see how often the same brands are named for the same prompts.
This is my second time analyzing AI volatility, where I was originally inspired by @randfish's call for more data on the topic.
Some highlights:
- The "core" of a response barely moves, but the tail turns over daily
- The usual leading brand is named first about half of the time, but when it isn't, it's often missing entirely
- While cited URLs change frequently, the mix of page types remains fairly stable
- Finding exact brand or citation list matches was rarer than you might expect, but it's a deliberately strict test
This isn't the biggest study out there, but I also think its size is closer to what a typical brand would track for themselves, which was the main idea.
The link is on the Detailed homepage, or you can also find it in the replies below.
Cheers! 🙌
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
"Yes, we are all individuals." Queue at Apple Store Regent St.
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Do you remember 'Thundercats'?
Did you know it was a 'psy op', designed to teach kids morals?
When they pitched it, they did so with a book called 'Thundercats - Synopses and Morals', designed by a 'psychological consultant', Dr Robert Kuisis.
Here were the first 25 episodes
What stopped you from building it before? // jonoalderson.com/conjecture/…
What 13 Billion Google Searches Reveal About Zero-Click Behavior // ipullrank.com/zero-click-beh…
The AI Hater's Manifesto // wheresyoured.at/the-ai-hater…
"Most SEO reporting rewards activity: audits completed, tickets closed, recommendations implemented, pages improved. Those numbers are easy to count. They can also describe an organisation standing perfectly still." // jonoalderson.com/conjecture/…
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
This blew up a bit more than I expected so I thought I'd add a bit of context and nuance to my point.
There is a real divide in the replies between people who have worked in SEO for a long time and those who haven't.
Those who have never experienced your entire business being removed/invisible from Google maybe don't see the risk vs reward the same way as those who have.
If you do enough outreach for backlinks you'll find out that many sites sell them. There are spreadsheets where you can literally pick and choose from a variety of niches and prices.
So you have a service like Outrank that creates a menu like this and sells those links to its customers. The demand for this is clearly very high based on the responses from Tibo's launch.
When demand is high and you already have a network of sites willing to sell, it's fair to assume that those selling sites will link out to more and more Outrank customers.
Easy money for the seller to just add another post or insert a link into an existing one. Pretty soon you have a very clear pattern that this site is selling links.
And so you look at the other sites that link to the same URLs. It's trivial to correlate these and find all of the sellers and all of the buyers for me - for Google 1000x so.
This is what you call a PBN (private blog network) and it's one of the fastest ways to get manual penalties - for both seller and buyer.
At best: the links will do nothing and Google will simply ignore them.
At worst: your site will disappear from Google overnight.
The argument against me is that you could just submit your competitors and take them out of Google. It trivialises the very real risk that you take whenever you buy links. The risk is significantly higher when it's promoted in a public forum like X.
Manual actions for unnatural links aren't as common as they once were because the spam algorithm detects them and ignores them but that risk profile changes when you start using a very public service (ironically getting more visibility because I raised concerns with it).
@Marie_Haynes has been the expert in this field for many years and she said this in 2024, which is still relevant today:
--
"I could just point links at my competitor then and get them penalized."
The thing is, it's not the links themselves that get sites penalized. It's the patterns that are consistent with building links to manipulate rankings. Google has many years of experience in identifying patterns of Link manipulation.
--
Many SEOs build their own PBNs to control the volume of links, content quality and relevance of them to avoid patterns but it is still a risk assessment they make. It's just done by people who fully understand the consequences because they have experienced it before.
Tibo replied and said that I was hating, but that was not my intention, although I can see how the original post was a little sensationalist and absolute.
Is it a 100% guarantee that your site specifically will get penalized? No. There is significant risk to doing it and my bet is that eventually (and maybe sooner than you think) you will lose Google traffic.
It may not be all-or-nothing. It may be that every algorithm update brings a new drop in traffic over time until the site no longer ranks for any of the things that matter - maybe even your own brand name.
This is all just my opinion based on my experiences of selling and buying many links through many eras of Google algorithm updates.
Use Outrank, don't use Outrank, but at least know and accept the risks if you do. Their landing page does not explain the risks outside of a tiny FAQ that barely scratches the surface.
Finally: make sure you are building an email list, a reddit/Facebook/Discord community and experimenting with paid ads as well.
Nobody should rely on search engines.
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
There are lots of worries about jobs at the moment, but every company I've worked with over the last couple of years has been furiously hiring. 'digital' jobs are booming.
It's often hard to find the decent jobs on LinkedIn, or the big jobs boards, as the good ones are mingled in with lots of spam, and 'ghost jobs' (where for example recruiters are harvesting CVs without actively hiring).
Here's a project to try and fix that. There are 125,000 jobs live already, all vetted to try and avoid the above problems, across every digital area - marketing, engineering, data, cyber security, product, AI, and much more.
The 125,000 current live jobs are filtered down from 1m+ total, getting rid of all of the CV harvesters, ghost jobs, etc, and anything over 90 days, to avoid wasting people's time. And each allows the jobseeker to upload their CV to get a match score on how likely they fit.
Every job is summarised in 3 lines, so you can find out quickly if it's what you want, before reading the whole job description, and we've also done some work so each job gives a full breakdown of the likely skills needed, even when those aren't mentioned by the hiring company.
There are jobs live from Google (1,495 jobs), Apple (435 jobs), OpenAI (229 jobs), Anthropic (217 jobs), Spotify (23 jobs), and tons more. And there's also a marketplace for people building AI agents to list them, and for companies to hire them.
It will keep growing (building with @marshalltay, who previously co-founded Palace Skateboards and co-owned Leyton Orient). There'll be more to help people - guides to help graduates, or people mid-career, to understand how they might fit different fields and how to switch to them, tools both for people looking for jobs and startups/other businesses hiring, etc.
Do have a look round, and please do share it with anyone who may find it useful.
digitaljobs.com
We are live today - the world’s first jobs platform for people and for AI agent jobs.
- 120,000+ digital jobs for people
- Quality is everything: no jobs older than 90 days, no ‘ghost jobs’ or ‘slop jobs’
- AI CV matching (upload your CV to see how you match up)
- Every job summed up in 3 lines, as well as comprehensive skills & descriptions, to save jobseekers time
- And a new marketplace for AI builders to list their AI agents / bots, and for companies to hire them
Please share, RT, follow along as we build to make this to the best jobs platform for engineers, digital marketers, cyber security, AI roles and more.
digitaljobs.com
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
Guys, I promise you, if you buy backlinks from Outrank you will get slapped out of the Google index and burn your domain forever.
Too many people haven't lost their entire livelihood to a spam update yet and it shows!
Wayne Barker - Freelance SEO, Marketing & Shit retweeted
This is a great new article by Glenn… Google is definitely not done fighting spam
There are times spam updates go unnoticed, and then there are some spam updates that cause a ton of volatility. Well, the August spam update was big. My latest post covers four case studies based on my analysis -> The August 2026 Google Spam Update – Scaled Content Abuse, AI Content, Programmatic Content, Thin Affiliates, And More [Case Studies]
The issues I surfaced across sites that were impacted included:
*Scaled content abuse (of course...)
*Mixed with AI-generated content and programmatic content (again, of course...)
*Thin affiliates (scraping Amazon data, no human involvement at all)
*Malicious activity (mixed with other spam issues)
And more...
gsqi.com/marketing-blog/augu…





































