@vtunkai
iAccount based inCzech Republic
About this account
- Account based in
- Czech Republic
- Connected via
- Czech Republic App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Engineering lead at @RedHat: @OpenShift cloud-native app-dev & applied AI portfolio. Languages, sport, travel. My own opinions.
Europe
Joined September 2010
- Tweets4.6K
- Following4.7K
- Followers1.6K
- Likes11.7K
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I can’t decide if people who assert that contemporary AIs can think or are conscious do so out of fear or out of envy.
But I can say that any such people do so either out of emotion or perhaps driven by some pecuniary interest in it being true, not from any fully informed or defensible position.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Speaking of scientific, Joscha, you of all people should know that one cannot prove a negative.
Indeed, you make the claim that LLMs can think.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as Carl Sagan observed. Thus, the onus is on you and others who make that claim to give evidence as to its veracity. The process of science then follows to test that that claim.
By inverting the demand you yourself are engaging in unscientific methods.
The claim that "LLMs cannot think" is unscientific, unless supported by a very difficult argument about non equivalence of causal structure producing anthropomorphic outputs. The claim requires a formally rigorous definition of thinking that captures how humans mentally manipulate conceptual structure. Since LLMs can reproduce all kinds of human output that require operations that are typically considered to involve thought (eg. scene understanding, text summarization, translation, computer programs, mathematical proofs, common sense arguments, spatial cognition, theory of mind), it has to be shown that LLMs reach these results in fundamentally different ways than human minds. In principle, this is not impossible (given that thinking is still relatively poorly understood by cognitive neuroscience), but would be surprising, because it has been shown that the causal structure of computer vision models is structurally equivalent to what neuroscience discovered about visual cognition in primates.
In any case, saying that LLMs don't think cannot reasonably mean that LLMs are inferior to human cognition (since that this evidently not true), but that LLMs discovered an equivalent yet at least equally powerful mechanism.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Replying to @PessimistsArc
Right. Dario was already claiming that GPT2 was too dangerous to open source back in 2019.
I made fun of them then.
Everyone should make fun of them now.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
The overview, why the context wall happens and why offloading is the fix: redhat.com/en/blog/context-w…
The how, enabling KV cache offloading in @vllm_project: docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/featu…
To friends in Israel and around the world celebrating - may the arrival of Rosh Hashanah bring with it the promise of peaceful renewal; may the silence of Yom Kippur be an occasion for peace and inner light; may the festival of Sukkot be filled with joy, gratitude and fellowship.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
🦔An NYU mathematician says OpenAI used his own progress against him to beat him to one of the biggest unsolved problems in mathematics. Tristan Buckmaster had been working toward a Millennium Prize proof using OpenAI's Codex when information about his progress reached OpenAI.
Days later, OpenAI published a full proof of the same problem using the same uncommon approach, after burning $22.5 million in compute to get there. When Buckmaster confronted them, exec Sébastien Bubeck allegedly said "Why would you ruin your career?" and "If you don't want me to be nice, then I don't have to be nice."
My Take
OpenAI spent $22.5 million to solve a problem with a $1 million prize. They didn't do this for the bounty. They needed a headline that says "our AI solved one of the hardest problems in mathematics" and they needed it before someone else got credit. They started days after they heard about Buckmaster's progress and took the same uncommon approach he'd pursued for months. That's hard to explain as coincidence.
Buckmaster did his work inside Codex. OpenAI reserves the right to train on Codex data. They admit they can't rule out that his usage helped improve their models. So a customer used their product, potentially handed them the roadmap, and then OpenAI outran him with $22.5 million in compute he could never match. I don't know if any of this was intentional. But if you're a researcher and you just watched this happen, I don't think you'd keep your best ideas inside someone else's product.
Hedgie🤗
techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/op…
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I do not fear the rise of artificial intelligence.
But I do fear the rise of a small set of billionaires and companies who seek to build such things to increase their power and their wealth, all without transparency or accountability.
Sending lots of love to the Apple community on my last day as CEO. My title changes tomorrow, but the love I have for the Apple community never will. Thank you for being a constant source of inspiration. My gratitude is endless, and I’m excited for the next chapter!
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Naturally, hard times tend to make folks withdraw into themselves; become more insular, more isolated, and focus on their own self-interest to a higher degree.
I think we have to resist that urge, though.
To force ourselves to the common good; to become the leaders we need.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Looked back at a product manager who used to have lots of original writing on social media and over email a few years ago.
Has 10x as many followers now… and an account that is ALL AI slop. Like unbearable generic slop slop. Nothing about PM any more.
Is this another form of “AI physosis” for a “content creator?”
I do not understand what the thinking of such folks is. “I managed to find a way to spend 10x as little time to spend on social media / newsletter writing and have 10x as much output with AI” thinking?
Except it went from interesting to terrible. No longer putting in any effort
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Check out the latest article in my newsletter: What Open-Weight AI Can Learn From Open Source linkedin.com/pulse/what-open… via @LinkedIn
How are leading organizations moving #AI from experimentation to enterprise value? Hear from @RedHat CTO @kernelcdub on how hybrid cloud platforms help scale AI workloads efficiently: red.ht/4pM1lLt
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I think this is the most important concept to understand right now: LLMs can’t jump.
OpenAI says an internal version of Astra, its next major model, has solved ten major open problems in mathematics and theoretical computer science.
This is extraordinary.
And I don’t use this word lightly.
During my PhD in mathematics, I worked on a problem closely related to Gromov’s conjecture. For decades, constructing a non-sofic group—an infinite group whose finite pieces cannot be approximated by finite groups—was a dream shared by many of us.
Now Astra appears to have done it.
This is not a toy result. This is serious mathematics.
But it is not “the most significant day in the history of mathematics”, as some have claimed.
This claim confuses scale with kind.
Astra has solved difficult problems inside existing conceptual worlds.
Calculus, topology, and scheme theory created new conceptual worlds.
They did not merely answer questions. They changed which questions mathematics could ask.
Induction finds patterns. LLMs are extraordinary at it.
Deduction follows implications. Using symbolic AI tools, LLMs are becoming formidable at traversing chains of logic that humans missed, abandoned, or could never afford to search.
But abduction is different.
Abduction invents the right concept, the right representation, the right question.
That is the jump.
Current LLMs can fill the gaps of knowledge left by humans.
But they can’t jump beyond the external boundary of existing knowledge.
*
Full paper in the first reply
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
The AI sprint is hurtling to a world where a small number of billionaires - without accountability or consequences- controls the information that flows to world at scale.
This is a world in which trust, empathy, creativity, and love - behaviors that are central to what it means to be human - must burn even more brightly so as to push back the darkness.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
AI is changing how we do everything. Lots of discussion about AI in the sw development But not enough about how open source sw development will evolve with AI. Let's have that discussion. redhat.com/en/blog/ai-assist…
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Red Hat OpenShift is named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Multicloud Container Platforms, Q3 2025. In his new blog, Red Hat's @asheshbadani explains how our open hybrid cloud strategy is solving today's IT challenges: red.ht/48biZBh
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Check out my new Technically Speaking episode with Bernd Greifeneder from @Dynatrace. We're talking about taming AI agents with observability and why being able to trust these systems is so critical. Give it a listen. youtube.com/watch?v=h-L0R_eH…
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Hear the incredible origin story of llm-d and how a shared vision between industry rivals is changing AI. New Technically Speaking is out now: red.ht/45kLARU.
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
It's awesome to see how we're making the OS feel faster and more secure for our customers with things like Lightspeed, Insights, image mode, and post-quantum security. This is what it’s all about—giving people the tools to move at the speed of innovation. youtube.com/watch?v=dhWW2Ux2…