erculent

Joined April 2022
"Last year, the British Insurance Industry produced a special report on the climate crisis. It predicted that at 3°C of global heating, possible by 2050, at least 4 billion people will die. That is half the world's population. We have known this reality is coming for decades. Now it has arrived. @RogerHallamCS21 runs a talk each month on the latest science and pathways to effective action — start joining them for more information. Tuesday 18th August 2026, 7pm BST, with climate scientist and communicator Dr Ella Gilbert. Sign up here: actionnetwork.org/events/the…
203
440
56
861
103,107
When I was in my early twenties, in the late 1980s, it was common to hear climate change being dismissed as a “theory” or a hoax, one supposedly cooked up by a mix of socialists hoping to bring down capitalism and a group of rapidly emerging new specialists – climate scientists – eager for funding and prestige. We now know that the strongest evidence for climate change was actually proposed not by socialists, or even by the new breed of climate scientist, but by research conducted by the fossil fuel industries themselves through the 1970s and 1980s. Industry executives accepted the evidence presented to them as scientifically sound decades ago, and they then worked night and day to keep the public ignorant of their findings. The Global Climate Coalition was formed in 1989 – secretly backed by Exxon, Texaco, and BP – and served as a powerful “independent” lobby group. When its own technical advisers concluded in 1995 that the science of global warming could not be denied, the coalition aggressively suppressed the report. Another group, Informed Citizens for the Environment, set up by coal and utility companies, used advertising blitzes targeted at economically precarious groups to persuade them climate action would be harmful to their household finances. A leaked 1998 internal memo from the American Petroleum Institute mapped out another multi-million dollar strategy, funding independent-seeming scientists to inject skepticism into mainstream debate in the media. The goal of promoting these scientists would be to make “average citizens” and the media “understand (recognise) uncertainties in climate science”. “Victory” would be achieved, according to the memo, when climate doubt became “the conventional wisdom”. These fake think tanks helped organise letter-writing campaigns, inundating politicians, to make it appear that there was a groundswell of opposition to any action on the climate crisis. Remember, the oil industry launched these campaigns to deceive the public and journalists even though its own scientists had demonstrated many years earlier that continued fossil fuel burning would have catastrophic consequences. This is an extract from my latest article Thatcher warned in 1989 of a climate crisis. She did nothing. Nor will her successors. Find a link to the full article in the reply post below ⬇️
30
236
12
479
15,034
sumsuch retweeted
Ryan Grim
@ryangrimApr 1
Whatever Israel’s level of popularity is right now is its ceiling, because Israel is going to take a huge part of the blame for the financial crisis and likely recession about to hit us. And while the global economy is on its knees, Israel will *still* be pushing for the war on Iran to continue. And people will have had more than enough. @AOC breaking against Israel here is a major sign of their weakening position. She tried very hard to find some reasonable middle position that wasn’t full opposition but it just isn’t there with the way Israel behaves.
🔴 NEW: AOC commits to oppose all U.S. arms funding for Israel Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she would vote against “any spending on arms for Israel, including so-called defensive capabilities,” during an NYC-DSA candidate forum, according to Peter Sterne, editor at City & State NY. A leading Democratic progressive, she is believed to be a potential contender for the party’s 2028 presidential nomination.
287
2,120
50
17,098
804,634