Just saw a tweet the other day from a Christian woman using the Bible to tell a man to not lust over a woman who was dressed half naked (Matthew 5:27–28) but as soon as the man used the passages of a woman needing to dress modestly (1 Timothy 2:9-10) or to submit to her husband (Ephesians 5:22) she went completely nuclear and said that’s just “an opinion” and was using buzzwords to cope.
Christian women are no different than feminists because feminism is encoded in society, in fact I respect openly admitting feminists women far more as you know what you’re getting with them, than the ones who hide behind religion.
The Churches will become full of them soon when we enter an economic reset, do what you wish with this information.
Daytripper retweeted
Replying to @Danizeh
Exactly. They're the same as secular women in dating habits, but they try to create this liability shield that they are different now because they are Christian.
Physical attractiveness is the main qualifier for most women, Christian or secular. All the other qualities they claim to want in a man are secondary to first and foremost being shallow.
Which is okay, but we're just pointing out how they try to hide that in the Christian world. Doesn't matter how good of a Christian man you are if you're not good looking enough.
It’s crazy to me how many Christians don’t understand the point of this tweet.
He’s not saying that she should date someone she’s not attracted to.
What Ryan is saying is that a bunch of women use religion as a shield to find a good man while still being just as shallow as people who aren’t religious, despite sitting on podcasts and talking about the faith and how they value things like character or what Jesus represents.
When I said that every woman is a FEMINIST to some degree, this is what I meant. It’s so deeply encoded in society and their psyche that it has become automatic to the point where a bunch of them don’t even understand their own minds.
This woman for example is 36 years old and an ex-escort who is now “born again.” But if a good man who is pure and true to his faith that she liked, viewed her past as a red flag, she would use the faith and the Bible to argue that she had repented and that he shouldn’t judge her. Basically, she is positioning herself in a win-win situation because you can grift easily with religion. It’s like an escape plan and a bunch of Christian men who are extremely emasculated will eat it up.
So, once again, Christian women are NO DIFFERENT from liberals, openly admitted feminists, or anyone else in this regard. A woman will always be a woman, adapting to whatever society looks like.
Daytripper retweeted
Corpos think that they can't find qualified talent domestically bc leadership stopped paying attention to how psychopathic their HR staff has become. There's not a talent shortage, the great workers are just refusing to work for you after HR abuses and disrespects them
Replying to @fw_andyyy
20 year HR professional here. Many times I’d make candidates wait a few extra minutes to see how they handled it when they got frustrated. Weeded out a lot of hot heads. Me, I’m looking for patience and understanding.
Daytripper retweeted
The number of wives who seem to argue against having sex with their husbands is concerning to me.
Either she doesn’t feel sex is an important part of a healthy marriage, or there’s a deeper issue going on that she seems unwilling to address with him.
Either one is a problem.
Daytripper retweeted
Replying to @TioCheech @fw_andyyy
i can’t wait until hr gets replaced with ai. you all made your bed.
Daytripper retweeted
Genuinely why would you marry someone you’re not attracted to?
If a wife says stuff like this, it tells everyone that she isn’t actually in love with her husband, she just uses him for security
Daytripper retweeted
If you don't owe your husband anything and he doesn't owe you anything, you are basically strangers. Why the hell would you get married
Daytripper retweeted
It’s wild to see some of the reactions this post got.
A lot of women really, really don’t like being told that they should fuck their husbands.
And I made the post gender neutral. Husbands have an obligation to fulfill their wives’ physical needs and desires as well. A healthy sex life is one of the foundations of a healthy marriage.
It’s too bad that so many women seem so averse to having sex with their husbands. And then they wonder why men don’t want to get married anymore. This is just one reason among many why marriage is a bad deal for men in the modern age.
Daytripper retweeted
>make job hopping the only way to survive
>make women and minorities the gatekeepers of new jobs
>make it illegal to hire white men at the same rate they get fired. Ie. Gotta fire 2 to hire 1
Partly why things were on the verge of collapse
Daytripper retweeted
I've got several coworkers and colleagues no longer living thanks to H-1Bs taking away their ability to live. One left behind a family of four.
Ask me how much I give a shit about Indians "scared" of us.
Daytripper retweeted
The boomers began their lives by rejecting any sense of obligation to the dead: eliminating every tradition, abandoning religion, destroying every institution.
They lived their lives by dissolving every bond with the living: offshoring factories, destroying every sense of obligation between employer and employed, destroying marriage with no-fault divorce.
They are ending their lives by ferociously consuming the patrimony of the unborn, running up the national debt to pay for their health care and social security, while invading their own countries with foreigners in order to keep wages down and real estate high.
Daytripper retweeted
You saved six percent on your framing crew by hiring imported, off-the-books labor instead of the local young men in your county.
Congratulations on your gross margin.
In exchange, you ensured that the twenty-two-year-old boys sitting in the pews behind you can’t earn an honest wage, can’t afford to buy a modest starter home, and can’t afford to marry.
You literally sold out the next generation of American families so you could pocket a marginally larger distribution.
Hire the sons of your own soil. Pay them a living wage.
Daytripper retweeted
We under-35s gave up our formative years and our economy to protect the 75+ crowd from a virus that was statistically non-lethal for us.
Our reward: financial ruin, while Boomers cash SS checks, book cruises, and call us lazy.
Why did we save them again?
Daytripper retweeted
Bitches be like “having a kid destroyed my dreams!” And their dreams were to get drunk and fuck strangers
Daytripper retweeted
I quoted you word for word, Ben.
It's not the first time you've pushed the Noahide Laws, either.
Here you are earlier this year telling your audience that abiding by the Noahide Laws is the only way for non-Jews—"Goyim," as you call us—to "have a share in the world to come."
"Judaism is not the only path to heaven… [A]s long as people who are not Jewish follow seven basic Noahide Laws—and this includes Christians and Muslims—they too have a share in the world to come."
Has it ever occurred to you that you lost your audience because you lie to them constantly?
I'm sorry you are a retarded liar.
Watch the whole exchange, linked below. I was asked why I don't convert to Christianity. In the course of that explanation, I explained that from the Jewish perspective, Christians don't need to convert to Judaism to go to heaven. That's the context.
The conclusion to this answer: "I think you're doing a great job by believing in Jesus. I think that's great. I think you should continue to go to church, I think you should continue to speak out about your faith, I think that Chrsitanity in America needs a resurgence, and that's the greatest factor that will lead to a revitalized America."
youtu.be/sHAQqvCz9lY?t=2883






























