Building an anti-fragile life. God. Health. Law. Tech. Gold. Guns. Crypto. Land. 1A, 2A.
Oregon
Joined January 2023
- Tweets13.7K
- Following90
- Followers398
- Likes30.7K
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Everyone says AI will kill litigation.
They have it backwards.
AI is about to make litigation explode.
For 100 years, American litigation has been limited by one thing. The hourly rate.
A breach of contract worth $40,000? The lawyer wants $25,000 to fight it. You settle for $12,000 and call it a win.
A customer stiffs you for $8,000? Not worth the demand letter. You eat it.
A former employee walks off with your client list? Your lawyer says "we can send something, but the motion practice alone will run you $30,000." You let it go.
That is how most American disputes end. Not in court. In a spreadsheet, where someone decides the fight costs more than the loss.
Now change one number.
A demand letter that billed 4 hours now takes 4 minutes.
A motion to dismiss that cost $15,000 in associate time now costs $15 in compute.
A 60 page discovery response that took a paralegal two weeks lands in your inbox by 7 a.m.
What happens to the spreadsheet?
Every "not worth it" flips to "why not."
Economists have a name for this. Jevons paradox.
In the 1860s, steam engines got more efficient. Everyone expected Britain to burn less coal. Britain burned more.
Cheaper power meant more factories, more railways, more uses nobody had planned for.
Bandwidth got cheap. We didn't send fewer emails. We built Netflix.
Legal drafting gets cheap. People will not fight less. They will fight more.
And here's the twist nobody is talking about.
Not all legal work moves the same way.
Cooperative work shrinks. Both sides want the same standard NDA, AI hands it over in 60 seconds, the deal closes. That market dies.
Adversarial work grows. The moment your opponent has AI, every filing they send forces a bigger reply from you. Every motion breeds a cross motion. There is no ceiling on an arms race.
Then it all hits a wall.
AI can 10x the filings. It cannot 10x the judges. Federal courts already have cases waiting years for trial. State courts are worse.
So picture it. Ten times the motions. The same number of judges. Clerks drowning. Dockets that stretch into the next decade.
Something breaks. I don't know what. But it won't be boring.
If you're a young litigator, here's what that means for you.
The paperwork was never going to be your career. The machine has that now.
The growth is in the fight.
Learn to take a deposition. Learn to find the hole in a 60 page brief that a machine wrote in 10 minutes. Learn to stand in front of a judge with 300 cases on her docket and make yours the one she remembers.
The machine drafts.
Someone still has to win.
Make sure it's you.
Vinem et Lex retweeted
The retreat has begun, with Slotkin apparently realizing just how spectacularly her arrogance has backfired and now desperately scrambling to bury her own words beneath vacuous platitudes about prosecuting illegal acts.
Normally, this is the point where conservatives say, “Well, she seems to have seen the error of her ways, so let's move on.” But that would be an enormous mistake. We all heard what she said and no amount of retrospective word games can erase it.
If anything, this transparent attempt at damage control is all the more reason to go absolutely scorched earth on her and the entire lawfare machine.
I have been clear for some time on where I stand on prosecuting corruption and illegal acts.
In a speech a few weeks ago, I said we need to hold accountable the people and institutions who stole billions of our taxpayer dollars and weaponized the government against its people. And we need a list of signature cases that go after some of the most obvious and harmful abuses of taxpayer dollars.
If Kristi Noem steered $200 million in taxpayer dollars to a friend's company to make her TV ads, as GOP sources suggest, she should be held accountable.
If Doug Burgum gave a $13 million no-bid contract for the reflecting pool, he should be held accountable.
And if Jeanine Pirro used the Department of Justice to go after the president's enemies without any legal basis, she should lose her law license, in line with the law.
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Congratulations to the self-appointed guardians of democracy on their latest alleged masterstroke: win an election, provoke the president into a constitutional confrontation, then declare his government illegitimate for responding.
Absolutely fucking brilliant. Somebody give these people a Nobel Prize in manufactured emergencies.
The alleged roadmap that @DataRepublican has found begins with Democrats sweeping the 2026 midterms. DSA activists then become the "foot soldiers" in sustained confrontations with Trump's administration, pushing toward a "doomsday scenario" involving the Insurrection Act, potentially in 2027.
And here's where the No Kings crowd deserves a standing ovation for sheer, breathtaking hypocrisy.
The president exercises constitutional authority during the confrontation they've allegedly been working to provoke. Suddenly, Washington loses legitimacy, Democratic governors become alternative political authorities, and the 2028 election becomes a referendum on whether America's existing governing structure should survive.
What an extraordinary fucking coincidence.
The movement screaming about kings is accused of preparing to exploit presidential power to advance a political transformation that includes proposals to abolish the Senate.
Apparently, democracy is sacred right up until its institutions become inconvenient.
The allegations also identify United Democracy Alliance as a coordinating force behind No Kings, Indivisible, and 50501. Roughly 7,000 documents, thousands of transcripts, and hundreds of recordings reportedly support the investigation. Those records still need to establish whether this astonishingly cynical operation was actually planned.
Because if they do, the implications are absolutely damning.
Imagine the arrogance required to deliberately provoke a constitutional crisis, exploit the government's response, and then present yourself as the heroic defender of the very republic you've been working to destabilize.
And imagine the contempt for ordinary Americans required to expect them to swallow that steaming pile of bullshit.
The No Kings crowd allegedly has a fascinating new theory of democratic government: when the voters and Constitution won't deliver your revolution, manufacture a fucking emergency and call yourself the rescue squad.
(article below)
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Slotkin should probably familiarize herself with the relevant laws before filming her intent to violate them.
PANTS ON FIRE: Democrat Elissa Slotkin says @BasedMikeLee is engaged in “his specialty” of “manufactured outrage,” arguing she has not and will never call for mass prosecutions of Trump or MAGA staffers in the federal government, but they would be WISE to disobey what the President asks them to do....
“Well, look, that’s manufactured outrage. That’s his specialty. I think the — the thing that I’ve heard from my own Republican colleagues and peers, including like interns and folks who work around the Hill who come to our events, they’ll tell you, like I, you know, I was worried. My parents were worried. You know, it’s really messy. I’m not sure what to get involved in. Politics in general has become messy. But, you know, when you’re being forced by this administration, for instance, to sign a contract that is given over to a company that Trump Jr. is on the board of, and you know that that’s a problem. Like, my point is, do not get yourself involved in illegal activity. It’s the same thing I was talking about a year ago. Whether you’re the uniformed military or a civilian in government, if you’re being asked to do something by the President or his team that’s illegal, you have a responsibility to reject that. That is my point, and that was the point I was trying to make.”
Vinem et Lex retweeted
"The player was wrong" mfers probably think the staff is in the wrong when the genders are swapped
Y'all will always think it's the guy's fault
🤖 Made with AI
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Slotkin.
What can men do against such reckless hate?
youtube.com/watch?v=2m2-8Co8…
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
How can you get to the end of a university degree and not understand how interest works?
This quoted post is unavailable.
Vinem et Lex retweeted
This awesome ad is running during college football games today, saw it during Notre Dame.
Clearly aimed at normal guys who may not pay too much attention to politics, but know Democrats are crazy.
Vinem et Lex retweeted
I don’t want to hear any political opinions from people who are
- still in college
- are out of college & still play video games
- over 40 and still have college debt
- never worked in the private sector
- are on mood altering medications
- regularly see a therapist
- complain about gas prices but are ok with the current income tax rates
- believe Iran was close to getting nuclear weapon
- live in subsidized housing or rent controlled apartments
- Karens / attended a march of any kind
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Economic shifts and AI will be the death of feminism.
But the wounds that young men got when they were discriminated against will never go away, because the male ego is brutal.
You’re going to see so many young men who will not hire a single woman once they get power again and will outsource their “work” to AI.
I know you're probably thinking: "that's illegal", well then men will take their laptops and go to another country, so governments will be forced to allow men to do whatever they want because if men check out you have nothing, and given most young men don't have families now, you're already on thin ice as it is.
Women will push for government policies with DEI again, but nothing will happen. They will then enter churches and play the “trad religious gimmick” in the hope of securing a good man, but even that won’t work, because young men are getting wiser.
Stock prices will also plummet in places where liberal women are, because the stigma around it will matter a lot, which will, unironically, force CEOs to adapt to the new world, and they will end up firing them. Look at Nike, for example: they went woke, and now they’re down -80%.
Let them enjoy these next 2-3 years. AI, internet money and crypto was a gift from God in order to restore the world to default settings.
Women will make fun of young men making less than $100K a year, but have no idea of the world we’re transitioning into.
We’re going through a global economic reset where soon, most people will not have stable, well paying jobs. In fact, most are already struggling as is.
Ironically, as AI progresses, it may actually be women who lose their jobs the most.
So the men being laughed at today may very well be more than enough in a future where women are struggling just to survive. Because men are more likely to work in industries where they’re less likely to be displaced, even in a global economic crisis.
This is precisely why an economic collapse is needed to fix the “dating crisis.” Once the fake email jobs and Klarna go, these women are in for a rude awakening and will be humbled.
Vinem et Lex retweeted
Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen.
I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn.
And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country.
