Proud Mum | Business Owner | Principal Environment Scientist | Conservative šŸ‡¦šŸ‡ŗšŸ¦˜

Perth, Western Australia
Joined June 2023
It’s so sad to see kids caught up in this! I have teenagers, and they spend their spare time playing sports, hanging out with friends, camping, boating, and learning new skills. I’m so glad they are happy and enjoying life while they are young, before adult responsibilities creep in. My teenage years and early twenties were packed with fun, and I certainly wasn’t worried about politics. Kids have no idea what they’re missing, and adults should be protecting their youth instead of pushing them into heavy issues. Let kids be kids and let them have fun!
🚨 WATCH: Melbourne's anti-Hanson protest is One Nation's best recruitment drive The protesters came to drive Pauline Hanson out of politics. Instead, their slogans, contradictions and hostility toward anyone who challenged them may be helping explain why One Nation keeps gaining support. rebelne.ws/4ArZBvy
143
There are now attacks on the ā€œmanosphereā€ from big government and media. This isn’t random. It’s coordinated. The aim is to push the Digital Duty of Care bill in a few months. This is where it gets interesting. The bill has been on the cards for months, but they’re only really pushing it now because they were waiting for an incident. That incident was the Swans. It doesn’t matter that these boys haven’t been charged, or may be innocent of sexual assualt. Now the story is ā€œyoung men and the algorithm.ā€ This new bill is the old misinformation/disinformation bill with a new name. Last time they tried to make platforms police ā€œfalseā€ speech. This time they call it a duty of care and ā€œharm.ā€ Same outcome: Canberra decides what can stay up. Albo can’t control independent media. People are not getting their news from the ABC and the broadsheets the way they used to. So he's going after the platforms. If he can make platforms throttle what we see, he doesn’t need to win the argument. That is censorship. When they bring this bill on, it has to be defeated.
43
179
11
1,137
16,773
Ha - Joe thinks we have a ā€œsuper f*ckedā€ up oppressive governmentā€ Well I can’t argue with that one!
Joe Rogan calls the Australian government a super f*cked up oppresive government. But he does like the people. Australians I like. It's their wildlife that scares the sh*t out of me. Australians will be like, "Yeah nah, just watch out for the snakes," and then go for a barefoot walk. The f*ck out of here. cc: news.com.au on TikTok
4
282
It is frustrating to see men dismissing the reality of biological differences in women's sports. The physical disparities between biological males and females are something women understand entirely having lived as the biologically disadvantaged gender in terms of sheer strength, muscle mass and bone density. Claiming that hormone therapy entirely erases male physiological advantages ignores fundamental science and anyone that thinks otherwise is a psychopath !
1
1
1
10
394
We need more of this šŸ‘‡
Just sent this formal letter to AFL CEO Andrew Dillon. @AFL Demanding XX chromosomes only for all female leagues or I’ll enter a full team of biological males identifying as women (called 2 Balls Collide) into the Adelaide female competition in 2027. AFL’s current policy is unfair, unsafe and morally bankrupt. Time actual men stood up for women.
1
6
414
How true is this! šŸ‘‡ If Census is all planning and policy, the questions indicated there will be lots of plans around gender, culture and religion! Not critical infrastructure such as hospitals, housing, energy, schools etc
Dear ABC, If you're looking for opinions on the Census Data, here's mine. I'm a former data analyst (crime), but I also designed a data matching algorithm still used today by Victoria Police because of its effectiveness, so I have some professional skin in the game. I am unable to defend the 2026 prioritisation of Census questions. How does "We urgently need nationally exhaustive information about whether someone identifies as straight, gay, bisexual or another sexual orientation"... While we didn't obtain nationally exhaustive information about whether households can access a GP, whether they have unmet childcare needs, whether working people commute three days rather than five, whether households are involuntarily overcrowded because they cannot find housing. Or these types of questions, which would surely be hard to argue against from a prioritisation perspective of best value for data capture, and best opportunity for Australians to provide a holistic picture of their lives; Citizenship / visa or residency status (because Country of birth doesn't tell government whether someone is a citizen, permanent resident, international student, temporary worker, etc. Those populations can impose quite different infrastructure/service demands). Year a non-Australian-born person obtained permanent residency/citizenship (because there is much better longitudinal information about settlement and integration than birthplace alone) Primary mode of transport normally used (Census asks about journey-to-work circumstances, but hybrid/WFH has made a single Census-day travel snapshot much less informative than it once was). Housing capacity/occupancy pressure (Bedrooms alone is crude. Ask whether people are sharing bedrooms, using converted garages/studies, or accommodating people who would otherwise live elsewhere. That's enormously relevant during a housing shortage). Reason adults remain in/shared household (Understanding drivers of Financial necessity, caring, cultural preference, disability, housing unavailability etc...would distinguish genuine housing stress from chosen multigenerational living & inform other pressure points th Government can focus on). Internet quality/access (As infrastructure in its own right, particularly with WFH, telehealth and online government services). Household energy characteristics (Solar, battery, EV charging, gas/electric heating etc... would be extraordinarily useful for electricity-grid infrastructure planning) Many of these variables have extremely obvious relationships with hospitals, roads, rail, schools, housing, childcare, workforce participation and infrastructure investment. The ABS also removed ā€œnumber of children ever bornā€ from the 2026 Census (it will return in 2031).... while introducing gender and sexual orientation. From a strategic-planning perspective, fertility and family formation are among the most consequential long-term variables imaginable. They affect future school enrolments, workforce size, dependency ratios, healthcare demand and population ageing. This missed opportunity to capture all those above mentioned data sets to inform in policy/planning areas isn't just a shame, it's borderline failure of professional judgement. We removed access to data that could inform those things, and replaced it with gender questions. Who managed to convince a ABS strategic review board ā€œWe don't have enough justification to collect fertility information every Census, but sexual orientation warrants universal national collection every five yearsā€?? I'd love to see the cost-benefit/consequences methodology behind that decision ! The reality is the Census can only ask so many questions, and we should prioritise the ones that provide the greatest benefit for planning Australia's future, not pander to the "feelings" of a tiny majority of people that got warm and fuzzy because a national census survey "affirmed" their gender. Thank you, if you read this.
1
4
240
Why? šŸ‘‡
Labor & the Greens just blocked urgent debate on Pauline Hanson’s bill to stop foreign terrorist fighters returning to Australia. 15+ ISIS-linked women have returned under Labor. Two on serious terror/slavery charges are free on bail. 13 men, including ā€œDr Jihadā€ could be next from Baghdad. Labor says it’s powerless. Hanson offered a solution. They voted no. Outrageous!
2
194
Precisely šŸ‘‡
Replying to @cmkusher
Australia is a once great country with an-unserious economy.
108
Great idea! Maybe Shaq will sign up for the @WNBA too!! šŸ™„
Replying to @EnesFreedom @WNBA
Maybe you can get Shaquisha to join too.
263
Haha, jeez! He would smash these girls on the court! Get men out of women’s sports now. This is the greatest attack on women’s rights since I have been alive.
After careful consideration and reviewing the current eligibility guidelines, I’m officially declaring myself a @WNBA prospect. If simply declaring who you are is all that’s required, then I meet every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA. My team and I have carefully examined the WNBA’s eligibility criteria and governing framework surrounding self-identification and inclusion. Based on the current guidelines, I can and am officially declaring my eligibility for the upcoming WNBA draft in April 2027. I know my presence on the court will stir up strong opinions. I am definitely not here to mock, make fun of, or disrespect any community or personal choices. I’m simply asking that the current rules be applied equally to everyone — the rules that represent the very values many WNBA players and coaches have publicly advocated for. My team and I are prepared to ensure these guidelines are applied equally, consistently, and without exception, and I look forward to the #WNBA honoring its stated principles. See you at training camp. enesfreedom.com
150
Can’t argue with this. Ban all biological men from women’s sports now!
The fastest female, 100-meter sprinter in recorded history is American legend Florence Griffith Joyner. She set the world record of 10.49 seconds on July 16, 1988. In 2026, there were over 1000 high school boys that beat this record! You read that correctly. In this year alone, there were over 1000 high school boys that beat the record of fastest woman in the world ever! If just one of those boys, or a meager 1/10 of 1%, decided to compete as a woman, he would crush the women’s world record! I’m not talking about a high school record or a college record or even an Olympic or professional record. I’m talking about the women’s world record that has held since 1988! Remind me again, why you’re not supportive of women’s rights.
1
168
Spot on šŸ‘‡
This would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic
1
2
247
I can completely relate to this šŸ‘‡ We've effectively ended up with the country's biggest high school dorks (the ones who hated everyone and sat in the corner) getting together to form parliament and run the entire government! No one who is nice, business-savvy, fit, competent, logical or has a decent sense of humour wants to be a politician. This is why the country is in the state it’s in right now. We need to work out how to attract some normal, capable people into these jobs! #aussie #dorks
ā€œVictoria Is Still Governed By Communistsā€. Want to support me? Links in bio to my Patreon program and merch.
2
153