Islamophobes are accusing Abdul El-Sayed of being proāMuslim Brotherhood JUST BECAUSE:
⢠His mother worked for an organization later designated by the U.S. Treasury for supporting terrorist groups.
⢠His sister-in-law appeared on a federal terrorism watchlist during the Obama administration.
⢠His father-in-law held leadership roles in organizations accused of Brotherhood connections.
⢠Those organizations were named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation case.
⢠His half-sister celebrated October 7 online.
⢠The same half-sister wrote that their family had ālong been MBā and described their motherās Brotherhood activism.
⢠His campaign buddy Hasan Piker said America deserved 9/11.
⢠He wanted to avoid commenting on Khameneiās death because some potential voters were grieving.
⢠He signed a statement urging Morsiās government to purge Egyptās media and police.
⢠He compared Oklahomaās Sharia-ban measure to historical atrocities, including the Trail of Tears.
⢠He praised the work of Tariq Ramadan, grandson of the Muslim Brotherhoodās founder.
⢠He defended his friend Mohamed Soltan, whose father was a senior Brotherhood figure.
⢠His campaign received donations from CAIR-associated individuals, and his father-in-law contributed $300,000 to a supporting PAC.
⢠He argued that a Brotherhood-led Egypt would not necessarily resemble Iran.
Youāre confusing what happened with what youāre allowed to notice
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
I don't live in the United States. I should be geoblocked from even accessing Abdul's donation page on ActBlue.
Yet I can access it and donate to that piece of shit just fine. Without a VPN.
So if I can.. what stops other people who live overseas from donating?
BREAKING NEWS: Abdul El-Sayed Campaign Official Reveals El-Sayed Receives Overseas Donations, Admits Foreign Contributions Are Illegal Under Federal Law, Warns Denouncing Hamas Could Cost Support
āYou know, he [Abdul El-Sayed] has people from overseas that donate to him...No it is not allowed."
āHe [Abdul El Sayed] can't just say, you know, no, I don't support Hamas, you know, I reject all of them, because he's going to lose the people that brought him up in the first place.ā
@AbdulElSayed @MikeRogersForMI
āIām not getting everything I want, so Iām going to āteach Republicans a lessonā by giving Democrats control of the congressional agenda, ensuring I get even less of what I want.ā
āThe lowest IQ people on the right
A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to block the immediate and greater danger
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
Getting heightmogged by the average-sized woman is crazy
Team Angie š¤ Team Abdul šĀ
Great to meet @AbdulElSayed in D.C. last night.
#angieforflorida #washingtongdc #cbc #alc55
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
The great error of ~every school of feminism is the baseline assumption that men dislike women and want to oppress them - generally supported by isolated stories about rapists, etc.
This is the opposite of correct. Were it true, women would fight very bravely, but the whole world would look like Afghanistan. In reality, what we have seen for at least the past 60 years in the West is that both men and women have a slight but stat-sig bias......in favor of women.
So, I mean, there's that.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
Iām going to start calling myself a Restorative Conservative because I donāt think conserving the status quo is enough anymore.
The status quo is broken.
We have a federal government buried in debt, consumed by mandatory spending and interest, that is incredibly detached from its core constitutional responsibilities.
This has been supported by generations of politicians who refuse to touch the programs driving us toward fiscal and economic collapse.
Restorative Conservatism means restoring the proper role of the federal government:
Secure the border, maintain the strongest military in the world, protect the constitutional order, honor obligations to veterans and those who have already built their lives around promises like Social Security and Medicare, and then begin the difficult work of dismantling, devolving, or reforming the massive entitlement and welfare state that Washington has built atop mountains of our forcibly taken monies.
The āso whatā is simple, there is nothing conservative about conserving national decline.
If we continue borrowing from future generations to maintain a government we cannot afford, eventually the economics will make every other political argument irrelevant.
The goal is not to destroy government.
The goal is to restore a federal government strong enough to do what it must, restrained enough to stop doing what it should not, and solvent enough to survive.
Letās start actually fighting to take our government back from being the biggest welfare state in the entire world.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
Gonna be honest, folks...if you have SSR-eyes like this, your opinion is immediately disregarded.
Holy mackerel the baby-strangler fans are just...special.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
The jury foreperson is beside herself. She told the holdout to:
-read the room
-be normal for once
-just be a decent human being
She then called him an incel and said he would never get laid again in this town.
And nevertheless, he persisted.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
An argument against Social Security:
If Social Security is allegedly justified as progressive redistribution, replace it with a negative income tax.
If Social Security is allegedly justified on paternalistic grounds, replace it with mandatory private saving.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
When politicians say they want to seize/tax "wealth" but actually mean "shares in your own company that you yourself founded", the real point is making it impossible for anyone to actually control their own company for more than a decade.
They won't let you stay, either.
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
What's funny about "Epstein class" discourse: Epstein was a liberal elite who spent most of his time with other liberals. Yet liberals love "Epstein class" rhetoric because they understand that it mobilizes podcast goyim against Trump, who blackballed Epstein in the mid 2000s.
I don't like thinking of it as "picking the lesser of two evils". I think of it as "picking the underwhelming to block the explicitly evil."
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
I donāt know who needs to hear this.
But Democrats canāt win if noncitizens canāt vote.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin has said this herself.
With @mich_enjoyer
Dan Van šrangeberg retweeted
The problem with fixing $20 burritos is every actual solution will get you called heartless.
Eliminate minimum wage? Cruel.
Cut entitlements and national debt? You want to kill grandma.
Mass deportations? Racist.
Teach people to be frugal? Out of touch.
The only āwinningā political message will always be the Leftist proposal which usually amounts to āraise minimum wage to 1000/hr, start a U.S. Burrito Department, and give everyone a free burrito voucher,ā which, by the way, is how you end up with a $150 burrito.
Welcome to conservatism. Youāre the adult, and the ābad guy,ā in the room. Get used to it and start showing the political courage to actually fix this stuff.
Denying the validity of Paul because of Marcion is like denying the entire field of economic study because of Karl Marx.




























