Valerie retweeted
i keep hearing this kinda thing
@obvious is likely the most capable software factory on market right now
now to stay that way
I like to test out software-factory type tools and coding agents by asking them to go clean up and fix the architecture of whatever my sloppiest project is at the time and @obvious is the only one that's actually done it and not just made things worse.
Valerie retweeted
if you're trying to build an autonomous engineering team come and learn how at any of our upcoming 1 day hackathons in Austin, Atlanta, San Francisco, New York, etc.
obvious.ai/frontier
Valerie retweeted
the great American Renaissance will really begin when they put the coke back in coke
someone needs to get on this
Valerie retweeted
yeah but has anyone received THIS email from the cursor founder that my friend got
Valerie retweeted
Absolutely brilliant.
This guy literally used AI to explain the whole Anthropic drama to his girlfriend using fruits.
Valerie retweeted
Replying to @0interestrates
If you’re still using agents, you’re falling behind. You need to be using magicians which are like agents but it’s a different word. I have a GH repo that teaches you how to prompt your agent to fully convert themselves into magicians.
Valerie retweeted
Fable 5 is the same underlying model as Mythos 5, but with cybersecurity and biology blocks. Mythos is the first model that's made me feel that we've entered the next phase of model progress.
For years, we've talked about cybersecurity / self-improvement / autonomy / model-dominated coding / biology implications of model progress. Some of these are issues to defend against; some are areas to advance. Mythos has made me & our team feel like we've seen the earliest glimpse of the world we've been talking about.
Also, we published a lot of cyber eval results in the system card, including some evals we designed recently, as well as details of safeguards. In most cases, Mythos 5 ~= Mythos Preview. We found it ticked up on the new ExploitBench eval, and we opted to put that in the eval table so people can calibrate/update on advances in cyber capabilities to be prepared for. (We don't want to compete on offensive capabilities and don't try to.) But overall, Mythos 5 is an efficient model, about equal to Mythos Preview in most cases. I'd really like more people to design new security evals! The better models get, the more our limited evals only see a small part of the picture.
In terms of where we go from here, here are some current thoughts:
1/ It's important we get Mythos cyber capabilities to defenders. We just have to do it safely and cautiously. We're working on an expanded trusted access program. We're working with government and industry to do this. I sort of envision the next 1-2 years being a large scale effort to make the world resilient + design & implement new approaches to security.
2/ I think cybersecurity will start merging with AI security and alignment. Let's say you're a defender and you want to use a model -- will it break out of its sandbox? Will it stop where you tell it to stop? This is one reason I'm excited about working on cybersecurity. In the limit, it's the same thing as AI security.
3/ I really want people to develop new evals for... defensive cybersecurity, hardware security, autonomously running a business, advanced biology, and other parts of national security. Our internal eval ship rate is way, way up because Mythos makes it easy to iterate, especially on the engineering aspect of building evals. (Sometimes, we ask new hires to make a new eval on their first day, and another on the next).
I’m excited we’re making this available as Fable 5, because I think the world spending time with the model is the most important way to calibrate.
Valerie retweeted
You're not even allowed to ask Fable about basic biology questions, let alone anything that could potentially be dangerous.
Valerie retweeted
the next step function in engineering will not be models, it will be a code framework designed for agents not humans



















