Tekno-oligarklarla toplumsal sözleşme mümkün mü? Toplum­sal ve siyasal bir varlık olan insan “nasıl olu­yor da bir üst otorite­ye kendisini kontrol etme, gerekirse cezalandırabilme yetkisini gönüllü olarak devredi­yor” diye sorduğumuzda Thomas Hobbes’tan, John Locke’a ve Je­an-Jacques Rousseau’ya kadar uzanan bir ekolün “ortak rıza” üzerinde durduğunu görüyoruz Hobbes açısından bu rızayı sağla­yan motivasyon güvenlik ihtiya­cıyken, Locke doğal hakların ko­runmasına, Rousseau ise özgürlük ve eşitlik misyonuna vurgu yap­makta ✍️@DenizUlke dunya.com/kose-yazisi/tekno-…

What does responsible AI regulation look like? In a new report, Stanford HAI Associate Director Rob Reich and UC Berkeley's Deirdre K. Mulligan offer recommendations for updating California's frontier AI transparency law, from redefining "frontier models" to expanding incident reporting: hai.stanford.edu/policy/impl…

AI capabilities are advancing exponentially by some measures. Infrastructure builds more linearly. Organizations can take years to change. The result: bottlenecks, risks, and opportunities. New MGI research maps the AI economy as an interconnected system: mck.co/aieconomy

📢 New issue brief: AI agents increasingly operate autonomously on your behalf — but nothing stops them from prioritizing their developers’ interests over yours. Our latest brief argues that agents should be classified as fiduciaries and required to act in users’ best interests. hai.stanford.edu/policy/desi…

AI Data Wars Begin As Google, Mercor And Micro1 Bid For Spirit’s Data forbes.com/sites/sandycarter… #artificialintelligence #digitaltransformation

Google DeepMind argues RAG is broken. They published a paper that proved vectors databases are the dead end. For the last three years, the default engineering response to any AI memory or data problem has been identical: "Just build a RAG pipeline." Chunk the data, push it into a vector database, and let embeddings handle the rest. Every company scaling enterprise AI assumes that if an embedding model fails, it's just a matter of time. Better training data, larger models, more parameters—throw compute at it, and the search gets smarter. This paper proves that assumption is completely false. They mathematically demonstrated that single-vector embeddings have a hard, uncrossable limit. Here is the core flaw: An embedding compresses an entire document or a complex query down into a single fixed-length vector of numbers. When you run a search, the model takes the dot product of those vectors to measure similarity. The math reveals a brutal constraint. The number of distinct document combinations a model can possibly retrieve for different queries is strictly bounded by the dimension of its embedding space. It is a hard mathematical ceiling dictated by geometry and communication complexity. No amount of data scaling can fix it. No amount of fine-tuning will punch through it. Even if you give an embedding model infinite, unconstrained training freedom on the test set, it still hits the wall. DeepMind built a stress-test dataset called LIMIT to prove it. They threw state-of-the-art embedding models at it, models with thousands of dimensions. The models completely failed. Even on simple, structured queries, the single-vector bottleneck forced the system to drop critical context and hallucinate irrelevant results. Why? Because a single vector cannot capture complex, multi-faceted relationships between documents. When you ask an AI to reason, follow complex instructions, or handle nuanced cross-document dependencies, the vector space simply runs out of room. It collapses. This changes everything for software architecture. If your AI agent's memory relies on standard single-vector retrieval, it is structurally blind to complex logic. It is missing pieces of your data right now, and no prompt tweak can save it. If we want AI that actually understands enterprise knowledge, we have to throw out the single vector. And invent something entirely new.

📢 New issue brief: World models will reshape how AI interacts with the physical world. Our latest brief examines their emergence, opportunities, risks, and national security implications, and proposes a governance framework to guide policy conversations as the technology matures. hai.stanford.edu/policy/the-…