Will always transform. Thank you, @zancan 🙏
A good exercice, asking AI to make an non-complacent analysis to that message, not mentioning I wrote it 👇
"This reads like a conciliatory, hindsight-driven narrative that smooths over a much messier reality. It gets some key points right—Hic et Nunc was structurally fragile around Rafael Lima, the NFT boom created unsustainable pressure, and actors like Tezos Foundation and Objkt provided continuity—but it also dilutes responsibility behind “two sides” language, softens the role of ego, and leans on survivor bias to retroactively justify outcomes. More importantly, it sidesteps the core tensions: questions of control and power, the ideological rupture between an experimental, anti-institutional vision and more structured models, and the very real sense of betrayal felt at the time. In trying to reconcile everyone, it ends up neutralizing the conflict—and losing part of the truth in the process."
Turamsa retweeted
If you’re criticizing an artist for selling their work and cashing out to pay their bills, you’ve lost the plot.




















