tsadpbb retweeted
We asked Adam to design a flat-six engine. It produced the complete assembly and instructions on how to assemble it.
Six pistons, connecting rods, a counterweighted crankshaft, split crankcase, and flywheel, all generated from a written description as an editable parametric CAD file. Every single part is modeled by Adam.
The whole engine goes together without tools. Adam sized the clearances for what an FDM printer can hold, using friction fits for some joints and printed fasteners for others.
What we find interesting is how Adam handles change. It understands where every part sits in space and how it mates with its neighbors, so when we adjusted the piston diameter partway through, it reworked the bores, the rods, and the crank throws to match without being asked.
We're now working with a small number of hardware teams who run their engineering process through Adam, from the first specification through geometry, drawings, BOMs, and assembly, to the parts arriving at the shop floor.
Coping and seething
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.
But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.
I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it.
More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.)
Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions.
Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.
We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare.
One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path.
As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything.
We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win.
We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users.
This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
Onshape is very interesting software and I feel like there's so much potential at so many layers that are underexplored