Pinned Tweet
(1/18) Applying ordinary legal principles, the #FIA, #Masi and #RedBull are on shaky ground, on the basis of the #F1 #FIARegulations. Regulations 48.12, 48.13 and 15.3 do not work the way the FIA have explained. A thread. #safetycar #cas #formula1 #verstappen #Hamilton
@KLM_UK absolutely awful business class service from Kuala Lumpur to Schipol, followed by outright rudeness from Schipol staff who accused me and my 1 yo baby of being late to connection because we went to get McDonald’s (we didn’t, we ran to make connection).
24 hours later, stuck talking to a chatbot, still no luggage and absolutely no human contact. Dreadful! How is this your business class offering?? @KLM_UK
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
(23/18) Update 3 - I should also say that my description of RB's "it would make no difference" case was incorrectly based on reports, not the actual FIA appeal summary. I remain of the view, however, that RB's case on that was speculative and of little impact for the FIA appeal.
(6/18) What are the counterarguments? FIRST - RB argued that, textually, "any lapped cars" doesn't mean "all lapped cars" must pass the safety car. I can expand on this if interesting, but this is a poor textual argument legally.

