Radio in space is dead. 🛰️ We are just waiting for everyone to realize it. Modern satellites generate 200× more data than 20 years ago.
But more importantly:
RF broadcasts make space networks an easy target to detect, intercept, and jam.
That’s why defense networks are switching from RF to optical laser links as it is physically impossible to jam without standing directly in the beam.
Here’s the 1-page cheat sheet comparing RF vs. Lasers👇
Read the full report on why Lasercomms if the fix: airandspaceforces.com/new-re…
Deleting satellite data on orbit is not AI innovation.
It is an expensive coping mechanism for dial-up bandwidth.
The recent @ASForcesMag report shares: Sensors produce 200× more data, but downlinks are still stuck on dial-up radio frequencies.
The Obvious fix is lasers🚀
Photons > RF.
Drowning in Data: New Report Says Space Force Needs Lasers Comms to Beat the Bottleneck
airandspaceforces.com/new-re…
Laser communications is a bedrock requirement for AI, space data centers and other exploration in deep space.
Same way you cannot run datacenters on ground on 5G!
Transcelestial @trans_celestial is a single stack platform enabling ISL, Space to Ground and Cloud-connected global network of Optical Ground Stations to connect Earth with Space
NEW: The U.S. Space Force is generating so much satellite data that its communications network risks becoming a battlefield bottleneck, according to a new Mitchell Institute report.
Military space sensors now produce up to 200× more data than two decades ago, but much of it still has to move through legacy radio-frequency links that were never designed for today’s volume.
The report argues the Space Force needs to accelerate laser communications, which can move data 10–40× faster using beams nearly 1,000× narrower — making them harder to detect, intercept and jam.
It also calls for more AI and edge processing onboard satellites so they can filter and prioritize the most important information before sending it to commanders.
The warning is straight forward: the U.S. is rapidly adding sensors in orbit, but unless it upgrades the network connecting them, the data may arrive too slowly to matter.
Find the full report here: spacefutures-sa.com/docs/Spa…
It's what we work on. Our terminals are in orbit, with recurring optical acquisition and tracking from ground stations in Singapore and Spain.
Next: our inter-satellite terminal, scheduled for end of October. 🚀
Lasers can carry 10 to 100x more data than comparable radio links.🛰️
The Centre for @spacefutures_sa Space Technologies report makes that case, and lists @trans_celestial as one of the market signals for the shift.
Radio has hit its limit in space.
One image from Mars can take almost a day to download. Closer to home, the problem is scale.
Satellites already collect more data than radio can send down, and AI and data centers moving into orbit will multiply that many times over. Radio spectrum is limited and crowded. It can't keep up.
Our CEO @jharohit joined @NYSE Live to explain what replaces it: laser links that carry fiber-grade data between satellites and down to Earth.
At @NYSE talked today about space lasers, space data centers, undersea cables, national security issues, cell towers connectivity
Video soon
@trans_celestial is building the Fastest Network in Space and we want to give lasercomms to every single satellite, tower, data Centers, campuses, drones, ships and whoever needs high speed non jammable comms
Full take here: satellitetoday.com/space-eco…
Via Satellite asked what space looks like in 2040 for their 40th anniversary issue.
As our CEO @jharohit put it: your data will be moving through space at the speed of light.
Most of the internet still runs on cables on the ocean floor. One gets cut and a whole region slows down. Laser links between satellites, and from space to ground, change that.
Full CNBC piece on the four obstacles between orbital data centers and scale:
cnbc.com/2026/09/07/data-cen…
"Anyone can build data centers, but if you can't talk to these AI systems, then those data centers are useless."
Our CEO @jharohit to CNBC on orbital data centers this week.
SpaceX wants orbital data centers up by late 2027. Analysts say 2030s. Either way the hard part isn't getting them up there. It's moving AI-scale data back to the ground across a gap no cable can reach.
That's what we're building for.
"Our customer deadlines don't wait for permits. Adding laser links means we can serve a site in days rather than months, then backfill with fiber when the route is ready."
Samuel Pasaribu, Director of Business & Strategy, @telkominfra
TechDay Asia on the partnership:
telconews.asia/story/telkomi…













