@tqbf

Don't look at me sideways. Don't even look me straight on.

✶ ✶ ✶ ✶
Joined October 2007
DOWNVOTES IMPRISONING ME ALL THAT I SEE ABSOLUTE HORROR I CANNOT LIVE I CANNOT DIE TRAPPED IN THIS THREAD COMMENTS MY HOLDING CELL – at Austin, Chicago
17
47
8
525
OK, fuck it. AI data centers are drinking all the water. I'm negatively polarized back to that belief. HN comments to come.
Yeah I think I have like 20 shows I like max. It's a bad medium.
22
4,677
Today I'm parting ways with Fly.io. It's been a privilege. I'm off to tilt at a big old windmill with Kurt, again. sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/09/…
46
22
26
717
168,021
I will, for combinatorial-y reasons, be spending a bunch of time in SFBA in October and November (I'm into what we're doing next to miss the best 2 Chicago months), looking forward to meeting back up with my Bay Area friends.
2
1
42
7,613
Kurt's mad at me for not doing another 1500 words on technical stuff and the problems we're trying to solve and all that but I think there's never once been a good "I'm leaving X to go do Y" post, you just gotta cough that hairball out fast and move past it.
1
49
6,024
Represent represent!
4
14
2,183
Motherfuckers out there saying "I'm old" with fucking Breath of the Wild on their board. GTFO.
1
4
804
Ok, calling it: decorative gourd season has begun.
1
11
1,676
Thomas H. Ptacek retweeted
The bots and I made a little thing for my cryptography class: the one-way function transform lab. Interactively write security proofs (reductions + analysis) and attacks, both correct and wrong, for a variety of natural function transforms. web.eecs.umich.edu/~cpeikert…
3
36
1
135
10,123
40dab494d5f3bc867c8fd333dd9ed4be0e5fb82231c4086c9ed18b0cbff51cd3 (You don't care, just registering something.)
2
19
3,838
You know you guys are all "liking" a deadly boring claim about Chicagoland suburban local politics, right?
1
2
1,189
Thomas H. Ptacek retweeted
Replying to @tqbf
fwiw my friend @sunshowers6 recently tried asking LLMs to produce technical prose in "Williams style" and just that made the output much much more readable and stopped the effect of peoples' eyes glazing over LLM text
1
2
7
925
The most common pushback I'm getting to this post is that taking this kind of feedback from an LLM is going to bleach out your style just like having the model generate the text, because models can't be trusted with "style". No.
1
17
4,584
Also like 4 different people on the HN thread are convinced I literally had an LLM write this post because the term "load-bearing" occurred in it. I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddlesome nerds!
1
7
569
What makes me uncomfortable about all of this is that I know I'm not a great writer (it takes me 1000 words to say what a good writer can say in 300). But I can tell "objectively bad" from "reasonable", and I want the objectively bad scrubbed out of my work.
6
531