@totalguff

Loves curry. Supports unions.

Small blue green planet.
Joined May 2022
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
Even if you think AI is no threat to human existence its a potential credit bubble which if it doesn’t generate returns will crash the market in a way that we have never seen before
Brookings just published a brutally honest paper on what the AI buildout is costing America. A Columbia economist added up every data center, chip, power line and cooling system the US plans to build for AI, and the total reads like a warning to anyone with a pension. $10.3 trillion between 2025 and 2032. That's 3.6% of the entire US economy, every year, for eight years. No American infrastructure boom has come close. The railroad boom of the 1800s, the usual benchmark, peaked at about 2.2% of GDP. Canals, electrification, the interstate highways and the internet all came in smaller. The numbers are rough. Big tech's spending on AI infrastructure went from $97 billion in 2020 to about $400 billion in 2025, and it's on track for $800 billion next year. Over $1.3 trillion in debt is already committed to it. A growing share of that money moves through private credit, special-purpose vehicles and off-balance-sheet deals, where outsiders struggle to see who holds the risk. The economist stopped short of calling it a bubble. He said it's too early to compare it to the credit booms that ended in crashes, and he still doubts the payoff. "Silicon Valley wants all of us to believe that this is a miracle technology... it has to generate trillions of dollars of revenues to be financeable. I'm just not sure how likely it is." His main recommendation is to measure the exposure and make it public now, while the money is still moving, before a downturn reveals where it sits. I've been asking the AI labs for the same thing all week. Show us the incidents, show us the debt, show us who's exposed. Whose savings are underneath it when the bill comes due?
1
13
924
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
This is fairly obvious. If AI agents are allowed to act as autonomous agents in the market they can optimize transactions to such an extent no human would be able to follow the market. These economic risks are the canary in the coalmine of AI
The chief economist at Apollo is warning that mass adoption of AI agents could trigger a bank run as they optimize user investments. Gary Gensler spent his last few years as SEC chair warning that the exact same problem will hit the markets: the pursuit of algorithmic perfection at scale destroys system stability. Personal-finance agents making simultaneous optimal decisions could potentially cause a massive flash crash. Agent acausal coordination, with no messages passed between them, will show up in a lot of places. Markets will get the big headlines, but huge numbers of clever advisors making very similar choices will impact all of human society. Capability gains make this worse, not better. The smarter the agents, the narrower the optimal path; and knowing that other agents see that exact same path lets them move together without talking to each other. Agents do not need to collude to act in unison. Thus, they break no human laws by doing so. Human laws were not written for this. They were not written for a lot of what is coming, and it is about to start happening very fast.
2
1
8
906
Credit where credit is due. This is masterful engagement.
Please note this: M&S Freshly Squeezed Orange Juice (with bits). As I opened the bottle, I saw a not inconsequential amount of the liquid (and bits) clinging to the lid. Had I left the lid attached, there would be a non-zero chance the orange juice would gloop onto my white shirt. I therefore tore off the lid (attached due to the EU’s Single-Use Plastics Directive 2019/904) in order to make the product useable. It left a sticky scratchy bit of plastic at the top, which I now have to consciously think about avoiding as I drink my orange juice. My overall product experience has been made materially worse. Oh, and I ripped off the lid anyway. No one wins from this insane regulation.
50
I might be wrong, but don't all cars have this feature? "James said she had been driving the vehicle for a number of months and mentioned there was a feature on the Omoda that meant "it would begin to accelerate if a certain pedal was pressed whilst it was stationary".
34
Two loads of washing on the line, meal prep done, house cleaned and tidied. No one due home for about 2 hours. It's sunny out. You know what the time is don't you? Cheeky pub trip time!
3
5
102
Flick thru this tweet for a few mins for a proper memory lane trip!
What aftershave / perfume did you have when you were 17?
1
1
1
59
"We've had enough of experts."
Replying to @YoungGun8140
πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ - name one person who has died of hyperglycemia.
1
3
106
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
This is the last week of talks with government and employers. While they’ve been open and frank there remains a significant chance we won’t reach a β€œlanding zone”. We hope to avoid industrial action but we must be prepared.
6
36
84
6,253
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
50 years ago in England: πŸ›Œ c360,000 beds πŸ‘₯ 46.7 million population Today in England: πŸ›Œ c130,000 beds πŸ‘₯ 58.8 million population That’s a shift from 129.7 people per bed, to 452.3. This is before you even look at how our population has changed in age and health complexity.
"The [National Audit Office] analysis concludes that the biggest barrier to the flow of emergency patients is β€œthe availability of beds and inefficiencies in the treatment and discharge of patients”." #NHS hsj.co.uk/daily-insight/the-…
7
79
6
134
5,751
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
Let this be your reminder that pursuing your passion is worth it ☺️
249
5,790
477
78,382
2,678,741
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
Idiot…
3
51
2
169
2,380
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
Replying to @DailyMail
Can we all agree that someone with a piece in a national newspaper discussing how they were "cancelled" hasn't been "cancelled"
39
344
5
5,130
84,389
π”½π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•£π•€ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕦𝕣π•₯π•ͺ 🀘 retweeted
This bloke litters from his car not once, not twice, but THREE TIMES. 😑 We're going to highly publicise this shocking example of anti-social and selfish behaviour and ensure he's fined severely by the local Council. @TMBC_Kent @TandM_Greens @BBCRadioKent @TomTugendhat @ReformUKKent @KirstieMAllsopp
199
2,299
59
6,470
186,786