🇮🇱🇨🇵🎗

Joined August 2015
De onrusten in Frankrijk: een van de demonstranten draagt een bord met de tekst: "Stop met het besproeien met traangas, wij zijn geen Joden." OK, ik weet wel wat anders🙄
14
26
2
94
1,033
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Israel was right about this all along
137
1,376
61
7,756
235,878
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Omvolking in Frankrijk (2)
45
67
5
160
1,995
De vice-president van de VS, JD Vance, zegt dat de allochtonen verantwoordelijk zijn voor het geweld in Frankrijk. Vance: "Europese liberalen en socialisten hebben de derde wereld naar Europa gehaald." #vandaaginside #vvd #d66 #wilders #ja21 #tweedekamer
76
165
6
545
4,625
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Last year I was attacked in Paris by a pro-Hamas hate mob. They were screaming “F*** Israel, F*** USA”. This hate and violence was spreading like wildfire. And now, the same mob is waving the same flags and chanting the same chants while Paris burns. This was never just about Israel. It was never just about Jews. This is a war on the West and the freedom and values we hold dear. I said it then and I’ll say it again: wake up. This has to be stopped.
664
3,661
150
12,934
283,418
Antonie de Vry retweeted
They are very organized. In Marseille, ALL the Jewish-owned shops on the protest path were broken and looted, and most of the Christian-owned ones. NONE of the Muslim-owned ones. Here, one guy saves a shop by telling the others "it's a sister". You know djihad when you see it.
38
358
27
739
23,279
🚨Video wasn’t up 15 seconds and was removed from TikTok.. Can you guess why⁉️..
117
1,622
88
3,798
55,164
De inwoners van Milaan in Italië hebben er GENOEG van dat migranten uit de derde wereld hun winkels vernielen en SLAAN hen nu met wapenstokken TERUG!!! Een Italiaanse man die in zijn eentje een wapenstok hanteert, begint IN ZIJN EENTJE meerdere plunderaars uit te schakelen..
40
71
249
2,593
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Two days ago I wrote about the trap this generation keeps falling into. 1.5M of you read it. The most common reply: "OK, but who builds the trap?" Fair question. Here's my answer. And let me be clear from the start: there is no secret room. No puppet master. What exists is far more banal and far more durable: a machine of incentives, where every person in the chain is paid to keep the same story alive. Nobody has to coordinate. The money does it for them. Let's start at the bottom of the machine, with the person nobody ever looks at. PART ONE: THE MACHINE, LINK BY LINK A. The NGO bureaucrat. His salary depends on the problem existing. He isn't paid to solve it. He's paid to document it, denounce it and campaign about it. An NGO that actually solved housing would have to lay itself off. So the incentive is never "fix." It's "mobilize." And nothing mobilizes like a villain. B. The program officer. The person who decides which NGO gets funded. He has to show "impact" to his board, and impact means reports, campaigns, reach, people in the street. A group that quietly builds 200 homes produces a boring report. A group that fills a square produces a great one. C. The fiscal sponsor. The plumbing. Many activist groups have no legal structure of their own, so their money flows through an umbrella nonprofit that receives and redistributes it. This is legal and common, and it makes the money nearly impossible to trace from donor to banner. D. The university administrator. Subsidized tuition didn't buy better teaching. It bought administration: entire offices whose job is to read every interaction between students as a power relation. Remove the lens and the office has no reason to exist. E. The academic. Careers run on grants and peer committees. Publish inside the dominant frame and you rise. Publish outside it and you're "problematic." Nobody has to forbid anything, because everyone can read the incentives. F. The subsidized artist. Film, theater and festivals are funded by committees that reward the "right" themes. The capitalist villain isn't a creative choice. It's a funding criterion nobody writes down. G. The public broadcaster. Paid by the taxpayer, never by the viewer. It never has to win you over. It has to please the people who renew its budget. Guess which villain it will never investigate. H. The teacher. Usually sincere, usually underpaid, trained in the same universities as everyone else. He passes on the lens he received, in good faith. That's what makes it so effective: the people transmitting it believe it. I. The international institution. Agencies and programs built around permanent crises. When a crisis ends, so does a budget. The narrative of eternal oppression becomes, quite literally, a business model. J. The politician. The last link, the one who cashes in. The machine produces anger. The politician harvests it and sells, as the cure, more of what caused the disease. Ten links, and not one of them needs to be evil. Each one just follows its interest. That's what makes the machine so hard to stop: you can't arrest an incentive. PART TWO: NOW THE REAL NAMES The European Commission. Between 2021 and 2023, more than €7.4 billion of EU money went to NGOs, in internal policy areas alone. In 2025 the EU's own Court of Auditors concluded that nobody, not even Brussels, has a reliable overview of where it all goes. When MEPs looked into the LIFE environmental program, the Commission itself admitted that some NGO work programmes it had funded contained "undue lobbying activities." In plain terms, public money paid activists to lobby the institutions that pay them. The auditors found nothing illegal, and that's exactly the point. It's all legal: the state paying people to ask the state for more state. Open Society Foundations. Less a puppet master than a patron. By its own records, it gave Jewish Voice for Peace $875,000 between 2017 and 2022, a group active in the Columbia protests, and it has funded the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights. Does it pay kids to pitch tents? There's no evidence of that. It does something more powerful. Year after year, it funds the organizations that produce the frames, the slogans, the trainings and the talking points. You don't need to pay the protester when you pay for the lens. The fiscal sponsorship networks. The money doesn't have to go to the group on the poster. It goes to an umbrella, which passes it on. That's how fact-checkers can honestly say "no direct grant to the student group" while the ecosystem around it is funded. Both statements are true. That's the design. The French state. €1,714 billion of public spending in 2025, 57.3% of GDP, the highest in Europe. Public debt hit €3,595 billion at the end of June, 119% of GDP, a record since INSEE started measuring. Interest alone runs around €79 billion this year. On top of the bill sit public universities, public broadcasting, a centralized curriculum and culture funded by committees. In France the machine isn't an ecosystem. It's an administration. New York City. In June, a Rent Guidelines Board with six of its nine members appointed by the mayor voted to freeze rents on about a million stabilized apartments. That included the first two-year freeze in the city's history. One board member resigned, saying the board had been rebuilt to deliver the freeze. The first leases under it took effect on October 1st. Watch what happens to maintenance, to new construction, to the vacancy rate. Every city that has run this experiment got the same result. And when it fails, the machine will already have its culprit ready: the landlord. THE LOOP Now put it together. The state funds demand and blocks supply, so prices explode. The young suffer. The state then funds the NGOs, universities, culture and media that explain to them why they suffer. Those institutions point at the market. The young vote for more state. More state funds more NGOs, and the loop closes. The flag on those kids' shoulders the other morning wasn't the start of anything. It was the output, the last screen of a machine that runs all day, every day, on your taxes. You can't arrest an incentive. But you can cut its funding, and you can teach people to see it. That's what this account is for.
On my way to the office this morning, I passed a group of young people protesting, a Palestinian flag draped over their shoulders. And I asked myself a question I can't shake: why does this generation always fall into the same trap? No matter the history. No matter the context. Even the ones from wealthy families, who went to the best schools, who were dealt every good card. Always the same trap. I don't think it's stupidity. I think it's a mechanism. And a mechanism can be taken apart, piece by piece. A. The observation: everything the state touches becomes unaffordable. Look at economist Mark Perry's famous chart, the one people call "the chart of the century." It tracks US prices since 2000. At the top, what explodes: hospital services, college tuition, textbooks, childcare, housing. Increases of +100%, +150%, up to +250%, far above general inflation. At the bottom, what collapses: TVs, software, phones, toys, clothing. A TV today costs a fraction of what it did in 2000, for an infinitely better product. Look at what separates the two groups. It isn't technology. It isn't complexity. It's one variable: how much the state is involved. At the top, sectors that are subsidized, regulated, shielded from competition, where the state funds demand and blocks supply. At the bottom, sectors where companies fight every single morning to serve you better and cheaper. B. The mechanism: why it's systematic. When the state subsidizes demand without freeing supply, prices rise. Every time. Guaranteed student loans, and universities raise tuition. Housing aid plus blocked building permits, and rents skyrocket. Administered healthcare, and bureaucracy eats the budget before it ever reaches the patient. In France it's even more vicious, because the price doesn't disappear: it hides. You never see the hospital bill, you pay it through payroll contributions. You never see the cost of school, you pay it through taxes. Public spending at 57% of GDP, one of the heaviest tax burdens in the world, more than €3.4 trillion in debt. And the result? Overflowing ERs, falling PISA scores, young people who can't afford to live in the city where they work. The market didn't fail in these sectors. It was never allowed in. C. Suffering demands a culprit. A 22-year-old lives all of this in their bones. They can't find a place to live. Their degree either buries them in debt or opens no doors. The future feels blocked. That suffering is real, and I don't deny it for a second. But human beings can't stand suffering without a culprit. They need a face. A scapegoat. And this is where everything is decided: who taught them how to read the world? D. Whoever tells the story picks the villain. Schools are public. Universities are public. Culture runs on grants. Film goes through funding committees. Public broadcasting shapes the narratives. The people handing down the interpretive framework are, overwhelmingly, paid by the very system that creates the problem. Do you really think that system is going to name itself as the culprit? No. It names the capitalist. The boss. The landlord. "The rich." The multinational. The commercial West. Same role, same casting, every time. E. One lens, a thousand causes. And this brings me back to that flag. A generation taught to read every situation through a single lens, oppressor on one side, rich, Western, capitalist, oppressed on the other, will apply that lens everywhere. To housing. To climate. To conflicts on the other side of the world. The cause changes, the lens stays. That's why the trap is always the same: it's not the cause that draws them in, it's the way of thinking that was installed in them. F. The perfect inversion. Here's the irony. Capitalism is the force that drove down the price of almost everything it touched. The state is the force that blew up the price of almost everything it captured. And young people blame the first for the crimes of the second. It's like blaming the firefighter for the fire because you saw him at the scene. G. The ballot box confirms it. In the US, a few weeks out from the midterms, a large share of urban young voters is getting ready to vote Democrat for more state, more spending, more regulation. New York elected a self-described socialist mayor, carried by young voters, on promises of rent freezes and city-run grocery stores. Rent freezes, the policy that has made housing scarcer everywhere it's been tried. The cure that worsens the disease. In France, it's the same play in two acts. Part of the youth votes for the radical left, which promises more state. Another part votes for the center, which promises to "manage" the state well, and has dug the debt deeper than ever. Two different ballots, one shared assumption: the problem is the market, the solution is the state. H. The way out. These young people aren't stupid. They're right to be angry. They're just aiming at the wrong target. The day they understand that their rent, their tuition and their hospital are expensive precisely because the state runs them, their anger will change direction. They'll stop protesting against those who create. They'll start protesting against those who capture. That day, the greatest intellectual scam of our time will be over.
71
549
67
1,427
35,392
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Dit lot treft iedereen die in Nederland een narratief durft te bevragen, dr. Jan van de Beek @demo_demo_nl en ir. Wouter de Heij @deheij; heftige verkettering, hitpieces in landelijke kranten en kapot maken van je reputatie. Niet alleen met immigratie, ook met het klimaat-narratief, het Rusland-narratief en eigenlijk elk narratief. Je ziet het pas als je het doorhebt en ook als je goed luistert naar wat oud generaal Van Kappen ooit zei, open en bloot op TV. "Er is een informatie-operatie gaande, een informatie-oorlog, en iedereen doet eraan mee". En bleek achteraf dat je gelijk had, dan volgt er doodse stilte. Ik heb dat zelf eerder meegemaakt, toen ik vragen begon te stellen bij het coronabeleid; dreigbrieven van de Inspectie en hitpieces in landelijke kranten. Logisch, want de belangen die achter deze narratieven schuil gaan, zijn immens. Voor wat betreft Corona moesten er bevolkingbreed prikken gegeven worden. Veilig en effectief werd er gezegd. En nu er steeds meer lijken uit de kast komen zijn degenen die me destijds meldden bij de Inspectie muisstil en alweer druk met het volgende narratief. Wat jullie doen en hebben gedaan, ik heb er grote bewondering voor, is heel erg zinvol. Jullie maken het inzichtelijk wat de gevolgen zijn als er narratieven worden beschermd en critici worden bestreden, in plaats van het regeren van Nederland met als doel goede gezondheidszorg, onderwijs, voldoende woningen, kortom een beleid wat het welzijn van Nederlanders voor ogen heeft. Gelukkig hebben we het internet, want anders waren jullie op de brandstapel geëindigd of in een kerker onder de grond.
Wat goed dat je eerlijk zegt dat je er geen bericht over durft te schrijven ... en het nu toch doet. Het is vrij eenzaam in ‘migratiecijferland’. De meeste mensen zijn laf. Bang voor hun hypotheek. Of voor hun carrière. Of allebei. Elke keer als ik cijfers naar buiten breng die niet in het ’heersende migratienarratief’ passen volgen valsheid en hoon. Als de cijfers dan toch blijken te kloppen, zijn de valseriken stil. Lafaards.
12
261
6
693
18,145
Antonie de Vry retweeted
This is f**king nuts!!!
This is a Public High School in New Jersey! Palestinian flags, keffiyehs, “liberation” framing - all of it. Why was this approved? @CliftonBOE @CliftonHS
11
20
1
76
745
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Het zijn echt zulke lieve mensen en dankzij de spreidingswet kunnen we er straks allemaal van meegenieten.
100
77
6
271
30,622
Antonie de Vry retweeted
BETAALD DOOR O.A. DE EU 🇪🇺 En de EU betaalt nog steeds geld aan de Palestijnse Autoriteit in Judea en Samaria, aan de islamo-nazi's, die Joden vermoorden. U betaalt mee om mijn familie in Israël te vermoorden. EENVOUDIGER KAN IK HET NIET SCHRIJVEN. #EU #Hamas #PA #PFLP
4
26
55
863
Antonie de Vry retweeted
ISRAËL VEROORDEELT HET GEWELD VAN BEIDE KANTEN EN ROEPT OP TOT HET ONMIDDELLIJK STARTEN VAN ONDERHANDELINGEN OVER EEN TWEESTATENOPLOSSING IN FRANKRIJK! #17octobre
7
7
2
37
820
Antonie de Vry retweeted
ELK WOORD 🇪🇸🇪🇺 JUAN CARLOS GIRAUTA VIDAL, een Spaanse advocaat, schrijver en lid van het Europees Parlement.👇 "Jullie hebben niet geluisterd naar Israël 🇮🇱 — de voorhoede van het Westen in de strijd tegen de barbarij. In plaats daarvan hebben jullie ervoor gekozen om het recht op zelfverdediging van Israël te veroordelen, zijn terroristische vijanden wit te wassen, de gruwelijke misdaden van 7 oktober 2023 te ontkennen en leugens over genocide te verspreiden." "Vandaag zwaaien degenen die Europese steden verwoesten met de Palestijnse vlag." 🇵🇸 #CivilWar
13
264
8
710
5,651
Antonie de Vry retweeted
Disgusting, barbaric people. They saw a Jewish woman and went straight to their instinctual ways.
325
507
38
3,905
94,415