Tim Crowther retweeted
Fucking hell, they just did it!
The BBC actually described the Islamo-leftist riots burning France to the ground as “MOSTLY PEACEFUL”!
But Danny Tommo puncturing a people smuggling boat is terrorism to them.
Defund them NOW!
We're pissed off with the Uk & European governments too
NETANYAHU ON EUROPE:
“These are the same countries smashing us at the UN, vilifying us, telling us: ‘You lost the moral high ground. You stole the land.’
Then they come to me and say: ‘Can you help us with this anti-terror effort? Can you help us with this or that?’”
Should Israel help?
I say YES.
But every meeting should end with a press conference where European leaders publicly thank Israel for the assistance and acknowledge that the country they condemn is the same country they turn to when they need help fighting terrorism.
The licence payers are paying for that
This is indoctrination.
Why are the BBC promoting open borders in a game for children?
Deport illegal migrants and you lose points, but let them stay and a lawyer says it will make them “very happy.”
I don’t care about making illegal migrants happy.
They should be deported.
And the BBC must take this game down.
Tim Crowther retweeted
As France is burning, I keep thinking of what the UAE Foreign Minister said a few years ago 👇
He accurately predicted this.
Tim Crowther retweeted
France will burn into the late morning hours. To what end? So they can harbour millions who hate everything of what is means to be French?
Was it worth it?
Will it be worth it in Britain, when similar violence inevitably erupts?
I think not.
We watch as migrants ransack Paris whilst flying the flag of various African countries.
Some may have arrived illegally, for most their presence is entirely ‘legal’. Plenty were probably born in France, and are technically ‘French’.
For the rioters, evidently, their allegiance is not to France, or to the French people.
Where does their loyalty truly lie?
Their clan.
The civilised world’s response must reflect that.
Those convicted for arson, organised violence, and attacks on innocent people must face substantial prison sentences - foreign nationals involved must be removed. Citizenships stripped from dual nationals, obviously.
Mass deportations.
Act before they do.
And in exceptional cases, I would go further.
A Restore Britain Government will develop bilateral agreements and mechanisms with third countries to accept second-generation migrant offenders convicted of domestic terrorism and other such serious crimes, who, for now, hold only British citizenship.
There will be no statelessness. It will be conducted fairly, and it will cost, but it will be done, and a message will be sent.
The French should do the same.
If you burn down a city, terrorise law-abiding citizens and torch the society around you - there will be consequences worthy of the crime.
And if your allegiance lies elsewhere, and you demonstrate that through terrorism or extreme violence, a Restore Britain Government will send you to the country you claim allegiance to - if that's where your loyalty lies, we will aim to make that a reality.
Britain is just a few short years behind France.
We’ve had our warning - we must take it.
Absolute scum
Pour moi, c'est l'image la plus horrible de ce 17 octobre:
Un couple d'octogénaire dépouillé de tout, en pleine rue, laissé à moitié nu.
Comme si les Rolex, les Vuiton, les Hermès, les Dior, les Sephora pillés n'étaient pas suffisants pour la revente.
L'image qui devrait être un signal d'alarme pour tout l'occident.
L'image d'un pseudo président qui a perdu le contrôle. Qui a totalement échoué envers son peuple.
L'image d'une gauche radicale qui a sacrifié votre propre identité pour faire de votre pays une zone de guerre, aux arrières-plans culturels qui n'ont rien à voir avec les vôtres.
Cette image est effrayante!
All Complicit
CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 12 WERE BEING GANG RAPED AND SOLD BY PAKISTANI MEN IN OLDHAM. GIRLS OF 13 AND 14, KNOWN TO THE POLICE, WERE BEING DRAGGED OFF THE STREET INTO THE TOWN'S SHISHA BARS WHERE ROOMS WERE RENTED OUT BY THE HOUR. THE POLICE AND THE COUNCIL KNEW WHAT THOSE PREMISES WERE.
Instead of closing down a network of child rape dens and rescuing these children, the 2011 police strategy for tackling Oldham's Pakistani rape gangs listed managing the force's reputation and the far right among its priorities.
The specialist team set up to protect these girls was kept out of the operations against the shisha bars. Police intelligence placing exploited children inside those premises was not passed to the officers responsible for them.
In 2014 the leader of Oldham Council wrote on his blog that the abuse of children in the town was predominantly Pakistani men targeting white girls. He knew, and he was prepared to say it on his blog read by a handful of people. He never stood up in Oldham's council chamber and confronted what was being done to those children.
Anyone surprised why the rapes carried on regardless?
RIVENDELL HOUSE WAS A CHILD BROTHEL BUILT BY OLDHAM COUNCIL
In 2007 Oldham Council took the girls most at risk from these men and put them together under one roof, in a six-bed home called Rivendell House. The council's own staff admitted its location was not ideal. Burnham's reviewers accepted that housing girls already being exploited in the same building could draw the abusers to it.
A former care worker reported that in 2010 Pakistani men drove round and round the home waiting for the girls to come out, and that staff were not allowed to stop them leaving. The worker passed this to the police and the safeguarding board. Nothing was done.
The state gathered sexually exploited children in one building. The men knew where to find them. What Oldham Council built was a child brothel, staffed and paid for by the taxpayer. When the care worker went public in 2014, the council hired a consultant to investigate the allegations. Burnham's reviewers relied on the consultant's report and the word of the staff who had been accused of complicity. It dismissed the whistleblower.
THEY LIED TO THE BBC ABOUT THE SHISHA BARS
In 2013 a chief inspector warned that the risks in the shisha bars were massive. When his email reached the BBC, the reaction at the top of the council and the police was alarm at how much the journalist knew. They told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence.
This was a lie.
Their own officers had filed several intelligence reports in 2011 and 2012 tying exploited girls to those premises. The police held intelligence naming the children and the places they were being taken. They kept it from the specialist officers whose job was to protect them.
Senior police officers, senior council officers and the politicians agreed among themselves that the danger to these children was being exaggerated and would be used by the far right. Some admitted the council was also worried about scaring off investment in the town.
Children were being raped in those buildings while the people responsible for them discussed the town's reputation.
The journalist, whose father was a senior figure in the Labour Party, then participated in the cover up.
ANDY BURNHAM'S REVIEW WAS BUILT TO CLEAR OLDHAM COUNCIL AND THE POLICE
In 2019, as a direct result of the work of former councillor Warren Bates working alongside Raja Miah and the first of the rabble, the council leader asked Andy Burnham for a review.
We published what we had. The shisha bars, the children's homes and the taxis were our allegations, and Burnham's review was built around them. Its authors admit they began by reading our evidence.
When they asked to interview me, I agreed on one condition. That my testimony be given in Oldham's council chamber and streamed live to the public. They refused, because they would only hear it in private where they would take selective notes.
Five years later, they published a report that filed everything we had exposed under allegations made on social media, and told Oldham there was no cover-up. Burnham put his name to it and told the people of Oldham there had been no cover-up.
At the time we called Burnham's Assurance Review a cover up. In 2025, under immense pressure, even Andy Burnham was forced to admit to his review's failings.
THE COVER-UP MUST BE INVESTIGATED UNDER OATH
The national inquiry must examine Oldham with its full statutory powers, and it must not be confined to the boundaries Burnham's review accepted. It must cover the schools, the youth clubs, the children's homes and every year the gangs were operating.
Greater Manchester Police must hand over every record it kept from Burnham's reviewers. Oldham Council must release every document it redacted. Andy Burnham, the former council leaders and the senior officers who handled the shisha bar intelligence must be called to give evidence under oath.
The girls of Rivendell House, the girls in the shisha bars and the girls dragged in to cars outside school gates were failed by every institution that should have protected them. Then they were told by a review that could not see the evidence that nobody covered anything up. They are owed the truth, and only a statutory inquiry has the power to get it.
THE PRIME MINISTER ANDY BURNHAM MUST BE SUMMONED BEFORE THE NATIONAL INQUIRY. ANYTHING LESS THAN THIS JUST CONTINUES THE COVER UP.
_________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
Water cannon, rubber bullets then live ammunition followed by shooting to kill
Hamas need to be totally obliterated
On October 7, @EmmanuelMacron called Israel's 🇮🇱 Prime Minister @netanyahu and urged that Israel show restraint. Netanyahu responded: “if we don't dismantle Hamas in Gaza, you"ll meet them in Paris.”
Looks as shite as all the cretinous keffiyeh wearing cnuts
Allah akbar motherfcukers
One of many, most won't be caught until it's too late
🚨 SUSPECTED ISIS BOMBMAKER WANTED FOR RAPE IN GERMANY FOUND LIVING IN UK ASYLUM HOTEL
A suspected Islamic State terrorist wanted in Germany over terrorism charges and the alleged rape of a woman was able to enter Britain illegally, claim asylum under a false identity and spend almost two months living in a taxpayer-funded hotel.
The case is believed to be the first known instance of a suspected ISIS terrorist entering Britain by small boat and living here undetected.
Layth Ibrahim Mohammed, 39, an Iraqi national, is accused of making booby-trap explosives for ISIS during the 2010s and working as a paid teacher at a school for the children of jihadist fighters.
He crossed the English Channel from France in August 2025 and was accommodated in a Home Office-funded hotel in Oldham, Greater Manchester, despite allegedly having links to one of the world’s most violent terrorist organisations.
Mohammed was finally arrested by National Crime Agency officers in October 2025, after German authorities uncovered his alleged ISIS background. He is now facing extradition proceedings in Britain.
In a remarkable development, his solicitor, Joanna Curtis, argued at Westminster Magistrates’ Court that extraditing him would be inhumane because he suffers from severe anxiety, depression and pins and needles.
The court also heard that Mohammed had suffered psychological trauma after his son was killed in a bombing in Iraq.
Judges are expected to decide whether he should be extradited on 3 November.
The terrifying prospect is that Mohammed may not be an isolated case. Questions will now inevitably swirl around how many others with suspected terrorist links have slipped through Britain’s borders undetected. With asylum accommodation increasingly moving out of hotels and into ordinary residential streets, the possibility that dangerous individuals could be living anonymously among unsuspecting communities deserves urgent scrutiny.
They are all complicit
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL TOOK GIRLS INTO CARE. IT PLACED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 13 IN HOMES IT KNEW THEY WERE BEING TAKEN FROM TO BE RAPED AND TRAFFICKED.
When the girls reported rape, the council recommended teaching them which condoms to use and how to deal with pimps and their clients. The police cautioned the children for soliciting. Some were charged. The men were not.
When Birmingham finally commissioned its own research, its researcher, Dr Jill Jesson, reached a devastating conclusion. The care system itself was contributing to the girls' exploitation, because it was failing to meet their needs.
To all intents and purposes, Birmingham City Council was rounding up little White girls and pimping them out to gangs of Asian men.
I do not say this lightly. The council took responsibility for these girls. The men exploited them. The council's report proposed teaching them how to deal with pimps and which condoms to use. The police then criminalised the children before the council covered up what was taking place.
No one knows how many children were involved.
In 1995 twelve Birmingham councillors voted against finding out. In 2025 JESS PHILLIPS, the Birmingham MP who was the safeguarding minister, refused a national inquiry that would have found out.
Phillips knew that a national inquiry was the only thing that could reach the council in her own city. She knew all about the gang rape of little White girls by Pakistani men. In September 2025 she told parliament that girls had been telling her for years that police were involved in the abuse.
So why was it that JESS PHILLIPS tried to prevent a national inquiry? Could it have anything to do with the demographic of the men she relied on to stay in power?
Is Jess Phillips yet one more Labour politician that sold little White girls for votes?
________
AS FOR BIRMINGHAM TODAY
98 live child sexual exploitation investigations. Six suspected grooming gangs on the streets that the police know of. Two private hire drivers stripped of their licences following police intelligence about potential sexual offences against children.
And the ethnicity of the men involved is still hidden.
Under pressure, the council has now republished what it calls the Jesson Report. It is the version its own Director put in front of councillors in 1995 to close the matter down, with the ethnicity of the men taken out and his paper on the front saying the concerns had been "deliberately manufactured".
The original has not been published.
Read my analysis of what the council has released and what it has kept back, and look out for my live transmission where I go through the Jesson Report line by line.
Raja Miah MBE
redwallandtherabble.co.uk/fo…
________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me it means that when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. If you are yet to do so, and can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
He hasn't got a clue, especially about bus fares
People need to understand clearly what is happening here.
Andy Burnham has never been a fan of Britain’s democratic decision to leave the European Union in 2016. The referendum was one of the biggest democratic processes in modern Britain, with strong views on both sides.
The Prime Minister now claims officials told him that Russia interfered in the referendum.
Burnham used his first speech at the UN to announce the creation of the National Centre for Information Defence. He said it would tackle Russian misinformation that sows division, interferes in our democracy, spreads false narratives about Britain and pushes people towards the “far right”.
But today, a Foreign Office minister slapped down that claim, saying Russia was not successful in influencing the Brexit referendum.
It is clear that this new centre will almost certainly be used to clamp down on those who do not subscribe to Burnham’s vision of Britain or the progressive orthodoxies he promotes.
It looks as if Andy Burnham is now spreading misinformation about misinformation — the very thing he claims threatens democracy.
Tim Crowther retweeted
🚨 The UN commissioner who accused Israel of genocide did a debate to defend his report, and admitted his commission never visited the sites, never spoke to a single soldier, and has no direct evidence of intent.
His report still finds that Israel deliberately targeted children.
Chris Sidoti is the last original member of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Israel. He signed its 2025 report accusing Israel of genocide. When the media says “a UN inquiry found,” this is the man they mean.
Across from him: Dr. Brian Cox (@BrianCox_RLTW), 22 years in the US Army, seven as a military lawyer and prosecutor.
0:00 The deliberate killings his commission could investigate: “limited”
0:41 The doctors’ testimony: “it’s not evidence of intent”
0:49 “We can only get to the point of intent by inferring intent”
1:31 Nobody outside can check the commission’s evidence: “That’s a fair comment”
2:16 On genocide: “I can’t even begin to get into it”
It gets worse.
🧵































