@tinyForest

I'm going to make my own Cybernetic Culture Research Unit, with blackjack and hookers.

Joined November 2008
NeoNazi's have infiltrated the European New Left! I just learned that Verso books, which claims to be a leftist publisher, has been taken over by Secret Nazis! They have entire books on Carl Schmitt, and even a biography, written by a (former) UC Santa Cruz professor! I even heard the University of Chicago hired one of Schmitt's students! I had no idea the neo-nazi infiltration goes this deep, I'm literally shaking right now after reading this reason article. Secret Nazis Everywhere, perhaps the entire field of political philisophy has read these Nazi texts.
unavailable
1
209
tinyForest retweeted
Here is a leaked top-secret plan for stopping AI if it tries to kill all humans:
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
497
634
114
9,339
1,144,923
math departments about to go full butlerian jihad math.brown.edu/reschwar/Stor…
7
24
4
289
85,055
We need butlerian jihad
54
34
33
728
127,824
My supplier for custom humanoid robot parts btw 🇨🇳 Not sure the US can do better.
114
345
122
4,102
535,268
Most of these things have the mundane explanation that the Hollywood product isn't the movie, it's a legally cleared and de-risked financial product; anything that doesn't make "artistic sense" makes financial sense, even when it's nonsense - myriad obligations, contracts, unions, etc..
This guy isn't just a body double btw. He went to julliard. His mannerisms are that good because he's a talented actor and it's crazy Disney didn't just hire him outright.
1
208
tinyForest retweeted
The only reason @arctotherium42 wrote this essay is because no one else would. There should be academics working full time on this topic, but academia is fully on the side of the censors. He did an excellent job here, but “The Closure of the Internet” really needs to be a book.
New essay on the closure of the Internet, the mass censorship campaign that transformed every platform and the Internet as a whole from free and open to a closely monitored playpen 2015-2022. Longer than usual, around 27,000 words, so maybe best read in multiple sittings. Link in next post. Before 2015, the Western Internet was almost entirely free and open, except for actual criminal activity. Internet censorship was opposed by the major relevant institutions and seen as something distinctive to authoritarian states like Russia and China. Then within just a few years, every major platform (I cover YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Wikipedia, and Google Search, as well as more general deplatforming of websites, forums and open source projects, and comments sections) created a colossal censorship apparatus with tens of thousands of human moderators, opaque and ever-shifting rules, and an entirely new field of machine learning spun up ex-nihilo.
14
143
2
1,171
45,786
Yes, and if you have issues with the destruction of books (which is reasonable) be clear about why the books are being destroyed: copyright law. You should be as angry at Disney as u are at Anthropic
According to Words Rated, 16,000 truckloads of unread books are discarded every year. Surely, it's better to take some of those books and reincorporate them into society's knowledge base via AI.
1
31
3
219
12,642
Hot takes here are a great example of how policy gets reduced to emotionalism. You get the outcomes you deserve. If you want different policy outcomes, you need to change the legislators and/or put pressure on them to lobby for different policies. You don't just wish daddy government could come and make you smile.
🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗
3
99
And while we're pointing fingers let's point out who the real villain is Sonny Bono
11
If you wanted the magical government institution of preserving every old book you could have voted for that to happen.
1
11
It's possible to non-destructively scan books. Google got in a bunch of trouble for it, so now everyone stays within the guidelines issued 20 years ago. We had a chance in my lifetime as a millennial to come up with a better copyright strategy, we failed, and this is just the chickens coming home to roost.
28
I know they must think this is an own, but a young earth creationist did invent MRI (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymon…)
it’s actually a third thing: the traits that the organized pursuit of knowledge selects for are in direct conflict with conservative politics. it is hard to be an effective physicist when you believe the universe is 5000 years old and want to deport your international students
177
before 2010, if you weren't required to take a public stance on an issue like this, you could have survived. The problem became the escalating requirement for performance and signaling, not what policies you might quietly hold (whatever "conservative" might mean): elevating the "personal is political" to excruciating soviet-style paranoia, personality quirks, not making appropriate eye contact, or even individual words out of context became evidence that you were on the wrong team. After 2016, it was the absence of public signaling: if you don't have the right flag in your office or sticker on your car, you're assumed to be a neo-Nazi.
Here’s the brass tacks question progressive academics seem to want to avoid answering: does anyone seriously believe that a geographer critical of immigration would be likely to be hired by an elite American university? Or would those views put them at a profound disadvantage? 1/
1
85
tinyForest retweeted
The AI alignment community is unintentionally building a censor's toolkit, says this ICML-2026 paper: openreview.net/pdf?id=dy2Hwm…
15
9
1
54
6,099
For more on why the islands move and the canoe is stationary, a 1984 paper by Geoff Hinton (of ai/neural net/nobel prize fame) explains it cs.toronto.edu/~hinton/absps… and I recommend also the final chapter of first-author Hutchin's book Cognition in The Wild, about the importance of culture.
Caribbean Rhythms episode 219 thunder: oddities Polynesian genetics, patterns of racial mixing; character of Tahiti, erotic noble savage, controversy over sexual revolution, Margaret Mead, Samoa! free 45 minutes and SUBSCRIBE for full 1 hour 30 min show: bronzeagepervert.yoga/p/epis…
1
103
Every day, according to Claude, more loads are borne by so many increasingly trivial things.
34
Fully Automated Feline Communism?
Keep in mind that actual cats have successfully acquired a technology that technically largely surpasses their own intelligence thousands of years ago and they have managed to keep it under control and at their service since then, without any sort of issue. Their species has prospered and spread across the world, have basically abolished work, and enjoys free pate thanks to their domination over this technology. We have a lot to learn from them.
1
88
I can't believe with all the hot takes and knee-jerk reactions here, no one's pointed out that the cost is priced in because of the risk. If you're making that kind of money, you're more likely than not to have a sort of elite cultural formation. Which means you've also been around elite culture women, where #MeToo took off at the beginning and was always the most prevalent. This means that any person that you've approached organically carries incredible levels of risk: lifetime veto power and the retroactive ability to cause problems for you, in an Aziz Ansari type of a situation: I felt uncomfortable a few years ago. I'm gonna bring it up now. And because I'm from an elite culture, I have the network necessary to get this into the Times.
Five years ago, it was rare for escorts to charge more than $1K per hour. Now, a handful of women charge much, much more: $3k, $5k an hour. $23k a day. $30k a weekend. Inside the shifting economics of intimacy in Silicon Valley: forbes.com/sites/annatong/20…
77