@tinpie

Only 21 Million

Everywhere All At Once.
Joined March 2009
Are you suffering from a severe lack of popularity ? Want to be rich and famous again ? Have you tried the Gaza Grift ? #GazaGrift #Grifters #VirtueSignalForClicks
101
938
122
3,946
259,155
Martin retweeted
Goodyear shut its 78-year-old tyre plant in the Eastern Cape in 2025, costing more than 900 jobs. Nissan sold its Rosslyn plant to the Chinese automaker Chery and stopped building cars there after 60 years of manufacturing in South Africa. And last year, Ford announced it would cut close to 500 jobs. The National Association of Automotive Component and Allied Manufacturers (NAACAM), South Africa's auto component sector, has lost around 7,500 jobs and seen at least 15 businesses close their doors over three years. 63% of NAACAM's own members say they're either cutting jobs already or actively considering it. This is one of the country's biggest employers and biggest export earners, and it is struggling badly. Several factors are contributing to the closures. Cheap imports, mostly from China and increasingly from India, are landing in South Africa at prices local factories can't match. Energy and logistics costs keep climbing, and electricity supply remains unreliable. Then there's the global movement to electric and new-energy vehicles. William Kelly, an industry observer, says switching from a petrol or diesel drivetrain to an electric one is mostly a retooling exercise, and South African plants could build electric vehicles if someone made the investment case. But why would an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) spend billions retooling a local line for an electric Hilux when Thailand already builds it? Read the full article below.
26
152
10
331
49,755
This. 👇
Free Palestine is the dumbest political slogan in history. The people who repeat it don’t understand the conflict, and have no idea what they’re talking about. Their ignorance is so profound that to call them simply misinformed would be to pay them a compliment. Israel is not the aggressor. ‘Palestine’ is. Religiously mandated Islamic Jew hatred is the cause of the conflict. The Muslims don’t want freedom. Freedom is un-Islamic. They want to kill Jews. They don’t want their own state. They’ve had multiple opportunities, and they’ve rejected it every time. Israel gave them Gaza in 2005 for the promise of peace, uprooting thousands of Israelis from their homes. The Muslims could have turned it into a tourist paradise and a glittering jewel on the Mediterranean coast. Instead, they turned it into a terror hub and started raining down Iranian missiles on Israeli civilians. They spent the billions they received in aid to build terror tunnels from which to attack civilians. If these savages ever got their own state (which they won’t, thank God) the last thing it would be is free. It would be an Islamic hellhole run like Gaza is run today, with summary executions and routine torture of anyone who steps out of line. Anyone suspected of being gay would be thrown from a rooftop to their death and their body dragged through the street behind a motorcycle. Israel is the good guy in this conflict. One day you ‘Free Palestine’ morons will wake up and realise that, and you’ll cringe at the people you are now.
1
48
The better side lost tonight.
66
I have never come across anyone with as big an I infection as Herman Mashaba.
77
It is impossible to project a globe onto a sheet of paper without compromise. Distances, areas, directions and angles cannot all be preserved at once. Something must be sacrificed when three dimensions are forced into two. Hence, there is nothing improper about preferring one map projection over another. But the quarrel over the Mercator projection soon becomes identity politics. And so it inherits every vice of that style of argument: it is anachronistic, reductionist, and charged with unspoken insinuations about colonial guilt and the inherited sin of white people. The Mercator projection of 1569 was a stroke of genius for the purpose it was meant to serve. Mercator’s map was a navigational instrument. Its decisive property was that it rendered directions and angles truly: a line of constant compass bearing appears as a straight line. To secure that property, a faithful representation of area had to be given up. But as already said: one cannot have everything when a sphere must be drawn as a plane. One has to choose. It is therefore almost intolerable to hear the insinuation that Mercator was some kind of racist, intent on striking Africans with an inflated Greenland. We should honour Gerardus Mercator for what he was: one of the great cartographers in the history of the craft. The author of a projection whose charts, for centuries, helped generations of seafarers across the open ocean - long before longitude could be determined with any reliability at sea.
160
463
44
2,928
123,331
The function of the Mercator map was to enable safe sailing and trade By stretching the poles, you can draw a line between any two points (any two sea ports) and the angle with respect to north will be constant This was called a rhumb line: it’s longer than the shortest line that travels a globe, but you can calculate it very easy This was very useful when it was extremely hard to calculate longitude and ships often got lost. With the Mercator projection, you can just calculate your rhumb line and, even if you get blown off course, you know roughly what angle to be traveling in, so you can find your way This is long outdated technology, but it was extremely important in its day. The new “Equal-area Projection” serves no such practical purpose. It exists to soothe neurotic liberals who are upset that Africa isn’t large enough on Mercator and that this distortion is harmful to Africa Its adoption reflects an affluent society where the underlying purpose of things is forgotten and the only function left is for objects to be symbols that signal belief (liberal beliefs)
NEWS 🚨: The UN has voted 164 to 1 to adopt a new world map that shows countries at their true relative sizes, with the United States the only country voting against it Before (left) and New map (right)
383
1,669
120
16,512
1,211,442
The dump shit hole is bigger than we thought.
62
Hear, hear
As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable? Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms? That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres? That men don’t belong in women’s sport? That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders? That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues? That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context? That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex? That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights? That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society? That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit? That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t? That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology? That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century? Let me have your thoughts.
76
679
4
16,262
1,681,237
Martin retweeted
The reason you can't let Trans Women compete in women's sport is that they are men. The reason you can't let Trans Women into women's bathrooms, changing rooms, spas, shelters, or prisons is that they are men. The reason you can't force people to use gender-based pronouns is that compulsory lying violates a right that everyone holds not to be coerced into saying things they don't believe. The reason you can't chemically castrate and dismember confused children is that children can't consent to medicalized harm. The reason gender medicine isn't medicine is that it's never been evidence-based and it's inherently self-harming. The reason you can't teach children that any of them can change sex is that the claim is a lie. The reason you can't build a civil rights movement out of people pretending to be something they are not is that "people pretending to be something they are not" is not an actual group, the group has never been oppressed (except by the binary and immutable nature of sex which is beyond the reach of any act of human self-determination), and there is no such thing as a duty to see someone as they see themselves or treat them as something other than what they are. The whole thing has to be refused in its entirety.
76
1,090
55
5,353
87,821
Thought so.
No man 🤣🤣🤣🤣 who did this? Meme of the year..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
91
👇🙃🙃
21
455
12
2,483
14,355
The ANC is like Tiger Woods. Done.
1
52
Kale became a superfood because a publicist in New York invented a trade association that did not exist. Before all that, the biggest kale buyer in America was Pizza Hut. Not for the menu. They bought it by the ton, fourteen thousand pounds of it in 2012, and laid it round the salad bar to hide the ice. Nobody was meant to eat it. It was the doily. Then a PR firm called My Young Auntie went to work. Hermès on the client list, Givenchy, and kale. She chalked it onto boards around Manhattan. Got it onto the menu of a restaurant she already represented. Had T-shirts printed, because obviously. And she set up the American Kale Association, website, Facebook page, thousands of followers, and then rang journalists to tell them she had been hired by the American Kale Association. Actual farming bodies said they had never heard of it. They had never heard of it because it was her, at a desk, in New York. She owned up in 2015 and called it the proudest campaign of her career, which is fair enough. It went off like a rocket. Bon Appétit declared 2012 the Year of Kale. Dr Oz got hold of it. Paltrow made the chips on television. Beyoncé wore the word on a sweatshirt in a video, Michelle Obama ate the chips on Fallon, and Whole Foods was shifting twenty two thousand bunches a day. A leaf that was hiding ice in 2011 was a moral position by 2014. And the noble heritage everyone assumes it has is fodder. Kale is Brassica oleracea, same as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower and sprouts, all of them the same wild cliff cabbage bent into different shapes over centuries. Kale is the one nobody bothered improving, because it was never for people. Britain grew it by the acre and called it cow cabbage. Fed it to stock to get them through winter. In Scotland it was so profoundly unremarkable that kail just meant dinner and the vegetable patch was the kailyard. Then the nutrition, which is where it falls apart completely. A hundred grams is thirty five calories. You could eat a kilo of the stuff, which would take you most of an afternoon and do something permanent to your jaw, and still not catch up with two eggs. The iron is the non-haem sort your gut mostly turns away at the door. And the whole superfood case runs on nutrients per calorie, a ratio that automatically flatters anything containing no calories, so the winner is always going to be something nobody could live on. Congratulations to the kale. The word means nothing, incidentally. Banned off packaging across Europe since 2007 unless you can back it with an authorised health claim, and nobody can, so it lives on menus and in headlines where the rules cannot reach. It is also so unpleasant raw that somebody had to invent a technique. You massage it. Grown adults stand at a worktop giving a hand rub to a leaf until it is theoretically chewable, then eat it anyway, because a woman with a fashion client list decided in 2012 that they should. Pizza Hut had it right the first time. It was decoration.
373
1,167
186
5,894
326,994
Martin retweeted
Help me get this to 10m!
Rome handed out free grain to 40,000 citizens in 73 BC. By 46 BC, Julius Caesar found 320,000 people lining up for their monthly ration. That eight-fold expansion happened in under three decades, and it shows you how welfare states actually grow. No Roman senator stood up and announced a plan to addict a third of the city to government bread. It happened incrementally, through political competition. Each magistrate who wanted votes expanded eligibility. Each expansion normalized the next one. The citizen who once considered the dole shameful eventually expected it, then demanded it, then organized politically to protect it. This is the core mechanism free market thinkers have identified across every era: once you create a transfer program, you create a constituency for that program. Recipients vote. Administrators build careers. Grain merchants who supply the state develop a stake in keeping the contracts flowing. The political economy locks in. Caesar, to his credit, actually cut the rolls back to 150,000 through verification audits. It was one of his more economically coherent moves, though the Senate still murdered him. His successors quietly let the numbers climb again. What did the dole require? Massive grain imports from Sicily, Sardinia, and Egypt, organized through state logistics at state expense, funded by taxation and conquest. When the conquest revenue dried up, the obligation remained. Rome had written a check against future military success, and future military success eventually failed to arrive. The lesson is not complicated. Distribute a benefit and you distribute dependency. Distribute dependency and you distribute political power to whoever controls the distribution. The grain dole didn't weaken Rome overnight, but it made every subsequent reform politically impossible.
6
63
234
9,195
Scott has an income of $55,000 per year. Scott spends $75,000 per year ($10,000 on guns). Scott grows his debt by $20,000 per year. Scott has total debt right now of $400,000. Scott has fixed unfunded liabilities of $1,750,000 and is less than 10 years from retirement. Scott's own employees say that his 130% debt will be 690% by the year 2096. Scott needs to refinance roughly $100,000 in the next 12 months to stay solvent. What is happening now? Scott has a Japanese friend who is his biggest lender (despite being in even more debt) that just told Scott he might need to unwind $110,000 of Scott's debt to the open market. Therefore Scot sent his Japanese friend "$50-$100" this summer to keep him calm and ask him to not dump the debt. The credit card companies Scott borrows from are refusing to give him cheap debt anymore, and are giving him 19 year highs on interest rates. Scott said on August 19th that because nobody is buying his credit card debt that he will "at least double" the rate he is buying back his own credit card debt with new debt he takes out. The credit card companies didn't like that and offered him even higher rates 24 hours later. If Scott goes bankrupt we have WW3, because Scott has been buying lots of guns. Scott would rather dilute Dollars he is borrowing in and watch himself starve than go bankrupt. You can buy 100% of the insurance in the world against Scott's insolvency for $15,700. Scott himself has said publicly that he wants to buy insurance against himself and that people should consider buying it. Scott's friends say they want to back his debt with the insurance against his debt - because the insurance is that cheap and the debt is that bad. This insurance plan's cost to buy went up 30% over the last 3 days. Why? Because people are starting to doubt Scott. Scott is America. The insurance plan is Bitcoin.
180
388
56
2,490
289,851
Boks by 25
29
Cyril Ramaphosa's sudden, hand-wringing panic over the continued erosion of South Africa's industrial base is the absolute peak of political gaslighting. For the President to stand at a podium and declare manufacturing "fundamental to our economic sovereignty" while his own administration actively strangles the private sector is pure theater. The industrial base isn't eroding because of external bad luck. It is being systematically dismantled by the ANC's own ideological obsessions: BBBEE and cadre deployment. Ramaphosa laments a dying industrial base while forcing capital intensive, high risk manufacturing firms to navigate an oppressive maze of BBBEE compliance. Foreign and domestic investors are not looking for compliance lectures; they are looking for economic viability. When you prioritize skin color and political connections over global competitiveness, investors pack up and take their factories to Vietnam, India, or Mauritius. You cannot have a manufacturing sector without electricity, rail, and ports. Ramaphosa's sacred cow, cadre deployment, has stuffed the boards of Transnet, Eskom, and Prasa with incompetent party loyalists instead of technocrats. By turning state owned enterprises into patronage feeding troughs, his government has made it impossible for factories to reliably power their machinery or move their goods to port. It is laughably hypocritical to talk about economic sovereignty when your state's economic policy has rendered the country completely dependent on Chinese loans, IMF bailouts, and Western green-energy handouts. Local businesses are shutting down because the cost of doing business in South Africa, driven by rigid labor laws, state extortion, and broken infrastructure, is too high. The ANC has successfully colonized the economy with red tape, ensuring that only politically connected elites survive while real entrepreneurs go under. Ramaphosa has mastered the art of speaking like a concerned observer rather than the head of the executive. He laments the crisis as if he didn't spend the last decade chairing the committee that oversaw the deployment of the very cadres who broke the state. No amount of social compacting or high-level investment summits can undo the damage of a state policy framework designed to extract wealth rather than create it. Manufacturing requires cheap electricity, functional railways, and regulatory certainty. Ramaphosa's administration offers the exact opposite, erratic power, stalled trains, and aggressive racial engineering. If the President truly cares about South Africa's industrial base, he needs to stop diagnosing the disease and look at the ideological poison his own party keeps feeding the patient.
We cannot accept the continued erosion of South Africa’s industrial base. Manufacturing is not simply another sector of the economy. It is fundamental to our economic sovereignty. nitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1vJpPNPbP…
70
280
26
757
34,045
The Stormers have just shared the playbook for the whole tour. IMHO, the ABs are cooked.
2
40