
Economics professor. Senior Fellow @mises. Retweets not always endorsements. I sometimes post material with which I disagree. https://xitter.cf/t.co/ADTR79yhLb
South Carolina
Joined August 2008
- Tweets2.2K
- Following1.1K
- Followers2K
- Likes517
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Universities spent years sneering at the tax paying public, calling half of them evil fascists, refusing to reform, waving their PhDs as if they were magical amulets that protected them from the consequences of their own actions. Surely they don’t expect sympathy now do they?
Timothy Terrell retweeted
When the entrant becomes the incumbent, it acts like an incumbent.
Once upon a time, Uber caused mayhem as conventional taxi services resisted it. Now Uber and the drivers’ union are joining forces to resist self-driving cars. Incumbents, whoever they are, really don’t like competition. This is one reason why the productivity gains from AI will take time to materialize—and, in some instances, may not materialize at all.
Uniformly high oil and gas well bonding rules do little to protect taxpayers or the environment. Ironically, as well operators struggle to cope with more financial assurance regulations and capital market trends, the well abandonment problem can worsen. masterresource.org/public-la…
Timothy Terrell retweeted
I’ve spent many weeks doing fieldwork in Tibet, sitting above these enormous, deeply incised Himalayan river systems and seeing firsthand just how geologically active this landscape is.
So spare me the climate-change grift every time a natural disaster strikes.
Catastrophic glacial outburst floods are not new. The 1981 Zhangzangbo GLOF released ~20 million m³ of water and debris into Nepal, with estimated peak discharge approaching 16,000 m³/s. The Himalayas experienced enormous GLOFs long before today's atmospheric CO₂ concentrations.
If it happened naturally in the past, we should expect it to happen naturally again in the future—regardless of atmospheric CO₂.
Turning a horrific loss of life into an immediate climate-change narrative without demonstrating that CO₂ caused this particular event isn't attribution. It's opportunism.
And the people exploiting tragedy to do it are grifters.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
This is Mises from Omnipotent Government (1944) summarizing his 1920 argument. Socialism cannot do what capitalism can do, which it appears is to solve a knowledge problem. Those planners under a system of collective ownership simply ‘cannot know’ because they cannot calculate.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
It's not a problem to use #AI as a tool in writing or let it entirely write for you. Or even, if you prefer, "think" for you (I don't recommend it). The problem is the fraud of using AI but claiming that what you present is *by you*. Many seem to fail to grasp this distinction.
A great weekend at the Classical Liberals in the Carolinas event in Charleston SC, with engaging talks from Sen. Phil Gramm and AIER's Samuel Gregg. We heard from many others on topics related to the 250th anniversaries of American independence & Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.
Our Classical Liberals in the Carolinas event would not have been successful without generous sponsorship from the John William Pope Foundation, the American Institute for Economic Research, the Institute for Humane Studies, the John Locke Foundation, and the College of Charleston Center for Public Choice and Market Process.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Sell someone an e-bike?
No crime has been committed, and no person has been hurt. There is no victim from that action.
Making it illegal *creates* the victims: the retailer who has a right to sell a good and earn money, and the consumer who has a right to buy the device and use it. Neither of them has committed any crime, yet are now victimized under the coercion of state.
If you hit/hurt someone whether on an e-bike, or a car, or any other device, that is already illegal. If the state was ethical and effective, it would prosecute such crimes. Since it is neither ethical nor effective, it invents new crimes where no victim exists and punishes people for those.
Too many lives have been cut short by high-speed, illegal e-bikes and e-scooters.
That’s why we are issuing cease-and-desist orders against 42 online retailers that have been selling these dangerous devices to New York City residents — including Target, Temu, Wayfair, Walmart, and Amazon.
The safety of New Yorkers is not for sale.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Zohran Mamdani is launching five government-run grocery stores in NYC with 30% discounts on essentials funded by $70 million of taxpayer money.
Sounds wonderful. Cheap food for areas that need it.
Who could object?Anyone who understands the economics, history and game theory.
Here’s why kind-sounding ideas can be dangerous ideas:
1. It’s a marketing campaign, not a food policy. Five stores won’t feed a city of 8.5 million. They exist to produce a spectacle - a photo of Mamdani holding a loaf of cheap bread and a grin that says “see socialism works.” The stores are the ad but the the product he’s selling is collectivism and more state control… which doesn’t work.
2. The maths is predatory. Grocers run on 1–3% margins. Mamdani is discounting 30% … over ten times the entire profit margin of potential competitors. Tax payers fund rent, property tax and supply and offer no penalty for a business that’s losing money. That kills any hope of competition that would naturally transform demand and supply dynamics for real.
3. It corrupts price signals and creates an arbitrage economy. Prices are data. They tell farmers what to grow, distributors what to ship, entrepreneurs where to invest. Subsidise the price and you corrupt the data ... and create a guaranteed profit for anyone with a shopping trolley. People will stockpile non-perishables, clear the shelves, and resell at market price, pocketing the taxpayer subsidy as personal margin. Venezuela ran this exact experiment: price-controlled stores bred a professional class of resellers, and the subsidised goods ended up on the black market anyway. The discount doesn’t reach the needy. It reaches the fastest to grab and resell the stock.
4. It’s proven to fail at scale. Kansas City tried a municipal grocery store and it burned through millions and ended in empty shelves. The Soviet Union tried it with an entire nation. In 1989, Boris Yeltsin visited an ordinary supermarket in Texas and was so staggered by the abundance available to regular working people that he later admitted it shattered his faith in the Soviet system. A random capitalist grocery store did more to end communism than any weapon ever built. The well sticked grocery-store is a miracle of capitalism not state control.
5. There’s no feedback loop. When a private store fails, it closes. When a government store fails, it gets a bigger budget. A failure becomes the argument for more funding. Losses don’t kill a failed experiment in a state run program… They feed bigger budgets. Watch and be prepared to see the $70m budget become $100m in no time.
And the punchline: New York just published a tender asking private operators to actually run these stores. Even the socialist experiment needs capitalists to work the tills. The actual profits will go to government contractors- watch as Accenture suddenly becomes a leading grocery story Labour hire company.
Markets aren’t the enemy of ordinary people. They’re the greatest anti-poverty machine ever discovered. Break the machine and everyone eats worse - especially the people you promised to help.
The only problem is that by the time it proves to be anothet failed socialist initiative there will have been millions of Tik Tok views of Mamdani pretending it works and spreading socialist propaganda to young people who are weaponised against their own interests.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
On Aug. 7-8 in Charleston, the Classical Liberals in the Carolinas annual conference will celebrate America at 250 years. Senator Phil Gramm will discuss the triumph of economic freedom, and @DrSamuelGregg will discuss Adam Smith and 1776. Register below!
classicalliberals.org/2026-c…
Timothy Terrell retweeted
why didn't "legalize apartments" take off more as a slogan?
setting aside debates about filtering and financing, it's a good Left YIMBY synthesis because it neatly captures the class exclusion of banning housing that's more affordable for lower-income people
Timothy Terrell retweeted
What is the best use of a forest, a river, a stretch of coast? @timothyterrell argues no planner can know—only profit and loss reveal it. Which means we cannot even tell whether environmental policy moves us closer to the goal or further away. #MisesU
Environmental Conservation
What is the best use of a forest, a river, a coastline? Timothy Terrell on why no planner can know—and what environmental economics does instead when it can't use prices.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Mamdani announces city-run groceries will set prices *30%* below retail.
Typical grocery margins are 2%.
Meaning:
First, the city will lose ungodly amounts of money -- at least 28 cents on the dollar.
Second, below-cost stores will steal enough market share that real groceries abandon the city.
Third, taxpayers will get tired of the money hole and slash subsidies.
At which point city groceries become money holes full of rotting food, so New Yorkers will have to take 2 trains and a bus to find a real grocery store.
Socialism will work this time 🙌
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Washington locked up federal timberland to prevent deforestation—while imposing tariffs on Canadian lumber, which meant more American trees felled. @TimothyTerrell: the two policies only make sense once you follow the money. #MisesU
Environmental Conservation
What is the best use of a forest, a river, a coastline? Timothy Terrell on why no planner can know—and what environmental economics does instead when it can't use prices.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Why does nobody build starter homes anymore? Dodd-Frank made small mortgages unprofitable, and 3,600+ community banks—the ones that made those loans—have closed since 2010. Builders don't build what banks won't finance. @TimothyTerrell. #MisesU
Will You Ever Be Able to Buy a House?
Timothy Terrell on why housing is unaffordable—and who actually made it that way.
Timothy Terrell retweeted
Homeowners vote in local elections. Future buyers don't. So cities restrict what can be built, and existing owners grow richer. Doubling a minimum lot size raises home prices 14%. @TimothyTerrell on zoning, the quiet engine of unaffordable housing. #MisesU
Will You Ever Be Able to Buy a House?
Timothy Terrell on why housing is unaffordable—and who actually made it that way.


































