Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac) header
Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac) profile picture

Supporting Democratic candidates dedicated to advancing AI innovation in America. Learn more at https://xitter.cf/t.co/Fd0Csgaa3x

Joined December 2025
Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)Photo by Think Big PAC (@thinkbig_pac)
We need to unite around real AI policy that keeps American innovation thriving & safe. China is already moving fast – we need leaders who understand the current moment. newsweek.com/how-america-can…
1
1
6,319
Alex Bores was formally warned about sexually explicit comments he allegedly made at Palantir. He quit 5 days later, but didn’t mention that part of the story. Nor did he mention ICE. Some jobs just don't work out, do they?
2
3
3,313
Alex Bores had plenty to say about why he left Palantir. Too bad none of it was true. Some jobs just don't work out. It's time for Alex Bores' next exit interview.
174
198
12
5,680
4,120,258
Can we please cut the BS here. @AnthropicAI, its dark money superPAC and its billionaire investors have spent MORE than us supporting your campaign. They have been backing you since before we even announced we would oppose you because you are a puppet for Anthropic. At some point, the hypocrisy has to stop. For anyone still wondering why we are opposing Alex Bores, this tweet is why.
AI oligarchs want to buy every election, not just this one. They're funding super PACs to take out anyone who might actually hold them accountable. I'm one of those people, apparently, which I'll take as a compliment. But this isn't really about me. It's about whether regular people still get a say in who represents them. Read more: nytimes.com/2026/05/13/techn…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This tweet misrepresents the timeline. Leading the Future, of which Think Big PAC is part, announced spending against Alex Bores on November 17, 2025. Public First was not formed until November 25, 2025 and Anthropic did not contribute to Public First until Feb 12, 2026. techcrunch.com/2025/11/17/a16… publicfirstaction.us/news/chris-ste… anthropic.com/news/donate-pu…
10
38
7
311
1,711,806
Think Big PAC retweeted
AI oligarchs want to buy every election, not just this one. They're funding super PACs to take out anyone who might actually hold them accountable. I'm one of those people, apparently, which I'll take as a compliment. But this isn't really about me. It's about whether regular people still get a say in who represents them. Read more: nytimes.com/2026/05/13/techn…
4
18
1
79
1,696,573
NEW: Today, our campaign is releasing its first ad of the NY-12 primary. There’s a reason we’re feared by the powerful. I’ve spent my life fighting for progressive values, I’ve taken on Trump and won, and now I’m running for Congress to deliver for New York.
787
👀
On AI policy & the NY-12 race—more super PAC money's come in backing Alex Bores than has been spent against him:
1
1
1
1,340
1/ Alex Bores now has THREE dark money super PACs backing his campaign. These fringe techleaders are spending millions to get their puppet in Albany down to Washington. See who is really backing Bores here...
4
1
1
3
1,504
4/ Alex Bores wants to do what Anthropic and their dark money groups tell him to do. youtu.be/IRUg75s8nlY
1
2
581
Think Big PAC retweeted
Hey @AlexBores @ACCass @bradrcarson, got anything to say about this and the millions in dark money Public First has funneled in to super PAC’s backing your campaign?
A thing I have always admired and respected about the AI safety ecosystem is how transparent it is. Even when transparency ends up causing problems, lots of orgs in this space are extra transparent just because it's the right thing to do. That's why I think it's a shame that the Public First network of PACs are not particularly transparent — and less transparent, in fact, than their major opponent Leading the Future. They use a 501(c)(4) "dark money" setup to hide the identity of many of their donors. By @vronirwin's count, there's $5.5m worth of donations from anonymous donors. That seems bad! Such funding structures are totally common in political finance. But I personally wish AI safety orgs held themselves to a higher standard.
1
1
1
2
4,869
1/ ICYMI: Today, Transformer’s Veronica Irwin published a scathing exposé on Anthropic funded Public First Action’s dark money-fueled political and legislative influence machine. See thread below:
21
80
14
1,269
12,382,703
4/ "And the effective altruism and AI safety communities from which the PACs’ disclosed donors are drawn from generally place great emphasis on transparency, radical candor, and intensive discourse.”
2
2
5
3,193