i write about technology and markets as a software engineer

Joined February 2026
been connecting my claude code to eraser MCP to draw and share diagrams with my team — life-changing, and claude draws diagrams better than i ever did by hand
1
71
been using codex on cloud to run long-running tasks (>10 hours worth of work) but the chatgpt app is never responsive @thsottiaux a workaround i used is to ask the agents to commit on every checkpoint, and i’ll check progress on github instead (phone only)
3
3
82
can’t wait to try!
Introducing Muse Wonder, our new family of frontier models with state of the art performance for personal and professional agentic work.
7
grab your watermelon 🍉 $META
64
claude cloud agents are 10x better than chatgpt's, for now
17
before AI: - foundation > intermediate steps > polish after AI - prompt > polish #1 > polish #2 ... > polish #100
14
the good old days of getting fried for naming a variable badly
it's sad that some engineers will never have the pleasure of being absolutely ripped to shreds during a human code review
13
stayed home whole day because of the haze man when can this be over
13
muse jordan
Didn't know @Muse could ball like that (inspo @arisawyers)
23
metacode getting 70k new users off their own employees 😋
$META & MICROSOFT ARE CUTTING INTERNAL CLAUDE USE AS THEY PUSH THEIR OWN AI TOOLS Meta and $MSFT, two major Anthropic customers, are reducing employee use of Claude, according to The Information. Microsoft had been on pace to spend at least $1B annually on internal Anthropic usage earlier this year, but has since cut that level by more than one-third. At Meta, Claude Code users have roughly halved to ~30,000 from ~60,000 earlier this year. Meanwhile: MetaCode users: 30,000+ Muse Code users: 6,000+ Meta still spent more than $105M on Claude Code over a recent 28-day period. Source: The Information
26
$META & MICROSOFT ARE CUTTING INTERNAL CLAUDE USE AS THEY PUSH THEIR OWN AI TOOLS Meta and $MSFT, two major Anthropic customers, are reducing employee use of Claude, according to The Information. Microsoft had been on pace to spend at least $1B annually on internal Anthropic usage earlier this year, but has since cut that level by more than one-third. At Meta, Claude Code users have roughly halved to ~30,000 from ~60,000 earlier this year. Meanwhile: MetaCode users: 30,000+ Muse Code users: 6,000+ Meta still spent more than $105M on Claude Code over a recent 28-day period. Source: The Information
46
64
18
619
73,934
thought it was over for robinhood:0x2cc0fac44b8252f6b10208b091aff2c94b4da77d, guess not
1
55
give this a go, my fellow LLM meat wrappers!
We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks: Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aerospace maintenance documentation. LLMs well-versed in this language and it comes with heavy constraints on clean writing style that I often find a lot more readable. Sometimes I've tried to soften it a bit e.g. ask for "80% of the way to ASD-STE100" because the spec is quite stringent. But even better: Diagrams / images. Instead of writing, ask your LLM to create a diagram. These can be a lot easier to process, parse, and understand. But even better: Web pages. Ask for output "in HTML" to get a beautiful, interactive webpage. LLMs are getting really good at frontend and can create beautiful experiences, animations, etc. But even better: Explainer videos. The output format I am most bullish on is fully custom / bespoke explainer videos generated on any arbitrary topic. Experiment with things like "Create a 3b1b style video explainer on X. Use my ElevenLabs API key for audio narration". (you'd need an API key for the latter or you can ask your LLM to find you decent free alternatives that use your local compute). This is actually starting to work! In summary: - As LLMs get better, they will do more and more of the legwork autonomously, and a lot more of our work will rise up the abstractions into oversight and understanding. - Luckily, LLMs can help here too because as intelligence and code are increasingly abundant, you can ask for large, custom, discardable software artifacts (e.g. web apps, video explainers) that would have never made sense to create before. Push the boundaries here and you'll be surprised.
1
24
software engineers have progressed from 80% coding and 20% thinking to the other way around — awesome!
14
open weights will catch up to frontier eventually, and LLM providers no longer can charge absurd prices on usage however, i believe users will still pay for premium for quality, say 1.5X, similar to how we pay a premium for iphones anthropic/openai will turn profitable without having to spend billions on capex every year to maintain “frontier” — and that’s totally okay AI/semis in general, will go through a phase of explosive growth the next decade, similar to the emulsification of mobile phones, not at rates we expect now, but gradually and steadily over a decade if ypu have an investing horizon of a decade, i strongly believe the AI/semis equities will continue to outperform the broader market
Massive deceleration in ARR growth for OpenAI and Anthropic. And most of this deceleration came BEFORE both dropped new models that are 80% cheaper for a similar level of intelligence. The outright decline in combined ARR is near.
33
nah i think zuck just found president trump funny
This was the exact moment Zuckerberg realized that he will be a massive winner in the AI race OpenAI and Anthropic were desperately asking for regulation because tokens are being commoditized by open source alternatives The only option for them was to keep reducing token costs to compete. The only problem? They already made commitments for hundreds of billions in capex. At a certain price, the return on capital simply doesn’t make any sense So they came to the realization that the only way to sustain their trillion dollar valuations was to either: 1. Become entrenched through regulation by preventing other models from gaining share 2. Fight up market and become vertically integrated by building platforms in the application layer The second one is where Zuckerberg has a massive advantage vs both of the frontier model companies He already has a massive user base with nearly a third of the entire world as monthly active users He already has multiple platforms that are cash cows for his business, that also require very little capital investment each year Meta could stop spending on their family of apps tomorrow and these platforms would still generate billions of free cash flow each year In essence, he can subsidize losses on any AI platform, such as Muse, longer than any of his competitors can This gives him time to simply just bleed out Anthropic and OpenAI, especially when it comes to the consumer facing application layer of AI Trump refusing to give in to Dario and Sam’s requests is a massive win for Meta and Zuckerberg. That is why he can’t hold his smile here
28
even sarah knows muse is the real deal!
OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar accidentally calls Dots “Muse” before correcting herself and says Dots will use memory that knows users’ conversations and how they show up in the world “We just announced Sol 6.1, best intelligence, lowest price, a fifth of the price of Astra." "In fact, it also leans into areas like memory, right? Chat really has started to know you. It knows the types of conversations you’ve had, how you like to show up in the world." "Muse is going to benefit. Sorry, not Muse. Dots is going to benefit from that as well. And then I think it will benefit just from the scale of our distribution channel, right?”
44
summary from an interview with a current $AMZN employee on how customers are actually using ai models. five takeaways on aws user behavior: 1/ bedrock wins on convenience, not price. customers already on aws stay there because compliance, hipaa, data residency and billing come along for free. one invoice, usage commitments count, one gateway to every major model. the cost is a slight feature lag vs going direct and sub-100ms of added latency. pricing is basically a wash. 2/ the model isn't the product. aws doesn't need to win on models. every workload that runs inference through bedrock drags compute, storage and everything else along with it. that's the real revenue. 3/ model lock-in is dead. six months ago, switching providers meant losing all your accumulated context. now teams dump it into markdown files and have an agent rebuild context maps. switching takes an afternoon. loyalty shifts from the model to the platform, and the platform is aws. 4/ customers are tiering models by team. builders get frontier models. sales, ops and call centers get cheap mid-tier ones. nobody wants to pay 2-4x for intelligence their team doesn't use. 5/ saas is splitting in two. the ones that put agents in front of customers and use their data well are pulling ahead. a lot of the rest will keep bleeding.
2
1
80
$UBER is paying €41.50 a share for delivery hero, about double where it traded before the bid. sounds pricey, but at $14.8b it's only ~11% of uber. fewer delivery rivals means less discounting, and discounting is what's been eating the margin.
1
53