Co-Founder of https://xitter.cf/t.co/cRiHqAYe4J | Systems & Infrastructure Engineer | Tech Consultant | Maker of Neopolitan Pizza | Husband & Father | Follower of Jesus the Messiah

Carrollton, TX
Joined July 2011
I love this
Timing is a small aspect that changes how an interaction feels When every tooltip has a hover delay, reading a whole toolbar takes 6.9s. With a delay only on the first one, it takes 3.7s The first tooltip waits ~500ms so it doesn't appear by accident. Once you move between icons, you're clearly exploring, so the rest appear instantly. Move away for ~300ms and the delay resets
17
Neuralink president DJ Seo says Elon’s aggressive schedules are rigorous first-principles engineering, and an all-green-light schedule shows 80 to 90% of delays are just assumed “What I’ve learned is that it’s not really some arbitrary management tactics, but it’s really used as a rigorous engineering and first principle, you know. Again, this is more applicable in the world of atoms, but we have this concept called all green light schedule, which is kind of forcing us to think about if every single light is green, there’s no administrative burdens or delays or no shipping delays or risk or no legacy bottlenecks, how fast can you build it?” “And when you think from that point of view and vantage point and literally strip away any man-made bottlenecks and you ask a question of how fast can you actually manufacture a chip, how fast can you design a robot and test it. It turns out like, I don’t know what the right number is, but at least 80-90% of it is things that you think are the way it is, just because you don’t really think about it from that perspective.”
Elon Musk says he sets the most aggressive deadline with a 50% probability of being achieved, knowing it will be late half the time, because a five-year schedule just expands to fill five years “I’m constantly addressing the limiting factor. So, I mean, on the deadlines front, I generally actually try to aim for a deadline that I at least think is at the 50th percentile." "So it’s not like an impossible deadline, but it’s the most aggressive deadline I can think of that could be achieved with 50% probability, which means that it’ll be late half the time." "There is like a law of gases expansion that applies to schedules. Like, if you said we’re going to do something in like five years, which to me is like infinity time, it will expand to fully available schedule and it’ll take five years.”
78
281
20
2,574
587,478
Design tip: If the app feels off but you're not sure why, it's probably the spacing.
75
238
14
5,193
249,588
I can't wait for you to drop a Tesla Roadster from a height to get it to terminal velocity to see if it's thrusters can stop it from exploding @whistlindiesell
14
Sean Rea retweeted
JUST IN: Reddit moderators remove a post showcasing Tesla's flying Roadster for violating the subreddit's ban on "political content"
1,067
1,677
425
26,849
979,144
I grew up with: * 14.4k modem * Doom was new * Win3.1 was sexy Today * I talk to computer and code comes back * "Hey check my 19 emails and tell me if there is anything I need to respond to and what are my events today?" * Full self driving cars * Actual flying cars WTF
189
167
17
4,586
92,994
Sean Rea retweeted
New Roadster is beyond movies, beyond imagination, beyond human, yet still made by humans on Earth
7,951
16,743
1,947
198,345
8,345,128
Sean Rea retweeted
You have no enemies, you say? Alas, my friend, the boast is poor, He who has mingled in the fray Of duty, that the brave endure, Must have made foes. If you have none, Small is the work that you have done. You've hit no traitor on the hip, You've dashed no cup from perjured lip, You've never set the wrong to right. You've been a coward in the fight. "No Enemies" by Charles Mackay
61
124
20
2,341
104,223
Sean Rea retweeted
Introducing React Bits 2.0 The library you know, rebuilt. Components now look sharper, move smoother and start from presets, and our design tools were fully rebuilt from scratch. 216 animated React components, free and open source as always. reactbits.dev
77
99
11
1,877
88,446
Sean Rea retweeted
Saw this attempt to community note me and realized I can clear up some common misinformation :) You can absolutely use your Claude sub for commercial purposes. An employer giving employees a budget to buy $200 subs for their work is 100% okay and within TOS. The limitation is simple: you can't serve tokens to other people with your account. This means I can't put my Claude sub on a server somewhere and charge you $10 to ask it questions. I can use my Claude sub to build T3 Code. I can use my Claude sub at my job (if my employer allows it). I can use my Claude sub for anything other than serving traffic to other people.
For the cost of 8 years of $200 Claude subs, you can force your team to use shitty quantized versions of DeepSeek v4 Flash running at 30tps. Incredible deal!
124
26
17
1,754
161,936
It's Halloween season again and as a mathematician I'm obliged to post this. I don't make the rules
65
4,851
179
20,107
410,398
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies. My observations: 1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively. 2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now. 3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention. 4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is. 5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now. 6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text. They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it. 7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy. 8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies. Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here. 9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens. 10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity! 11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it. 12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable. 13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think. 14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data. 15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open. 16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down. 17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building? 18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone. 19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good. 20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped. 21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense. Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era. Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways. Happy to be home and locked in. Until next time!
927
1,978
573
21,139
2,458,401
Finally starting my Omarchy journey! Thanks @dhh and the whole @OmarchyLinux community!
14
Distance from Texas, measured in Texases
192
980
260
10,985
639,790
Did the whole zero inbox with an ai agent pretty satisfying if you haven't tried it
1
28
Sean Rea retweeted
Join our Beta assury.ai/scouts
1
1
2
19
In 1964, a young University of Michigan anthropologist went to live with a tribe untouched by modernity. What he found destroyed the noble savage myth. Then his own discipline spent the next four decades trying to destroy him for publishing it. 🧵
238
2,353
373
13,246
4,169,501
dying 💀
97
742
113
5,544
545,999