Attorney. Jewish follower of Yeshua. Family Man.

Joined April 2022
Which covenant are gentiles grafted into?
39%Abrahamic Covenant
4%Mosaic Covenant
40%Messianic Covenant
17%No covenant, just sonship
346 votes • Final results
66
1
2
5
5,777
Can someone be born into the covenant of promise? Or is that covenant only available to those who have the faith of Abraham? Jews and Catholics grenerally believe in birthright covenant membership (with Catholics replacing circumcision with infant baptism). Thoughts?
3
1
300
Jacob Mendelsohn retweeted
Paul says Abraham heard the gospel. Not just some hint of it, but the gospel itself. “And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, ‘In you shall all the nations be blessed.’” (Gal 3:8) The English phrase, “Preached the gospel beforehand,” is actually only one word in Greek: proeuēngelisato. It appears nowhere else in the New Testament. The prefix pro- means “ahead of time.” It’s the same good news, announced early. So the gospel has a pre-history, and Paul says so himself. Genesis 12:3 says, “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” Genesis 18:18 says “all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him.” Paul blends them because he wants to make use of the word “nations.” Paul’s gospel was inclusive of the nations. Notice what the “gospel” to Abraham actually says. It isn’t instructions for getting to heaven. It’s an announcement: God will bless the nations in Abraham. That’s a proclamation of what God will do. Where else do we find this language? In Isaiah. “How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news… who says to Zion, ‘Your God reigns.’” - Isaiah 52:7 Three verses later: “all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God.” - Isaiah 52:10. It’s good news to Zion, with the nations in view. And how does Isaiah get to 52:7? Through Abraham. “Look to Abraham your father and to Sarah who bore you; for he was but one when I called him, that I might bless him and multiply him.” (Isa 51:2) Notice the three words used here: called, blessed, multiplied. That’s Genesis 12:1-2 in a sentence. Galatians is soaked in Isaiah. Paul describes his call in 1:15-16 in language that echoes the servant of Isaiah 49. “Hearing with faith” in 3:2 and 3:5 sounds like Isaiah 53:1, “Who has believed what he has heard from us?” In 4:27, Paul quotes Isaiah 54:1 outright. Galatians 3:8 needs to be understood within this context. So Paul reads Genesis 12 through Isaiah and so should we. Abraham receives the promise. Isaiah gives it a herald. Paul calls it euangelion. That’s the gospel of the gospel. Timing matters too. The promise of Genesis 12 comes before circumcision (Genesis 17) and before Sinai, which came “430 years afterward” (Galatians 3:17). The blessing of the nations was announced before either. It never depended on Gentiles becoming Jews. What would the alternative actually look like? What if every Gentile had to be circumcised and become a Jew to receive Abraham’s blessing? Then who are the “nations” that get blessed? There would be none left. The promise would erase its own recipients. That’s a reductio ad absurdum. The promise requires nations to remain nations. Isaiah sees exactly this: “Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my inheritance.” (Isaiah 19:25) Three peoples, one God, and nobody stops being who they are. That helps explain why Paul fights gentile circumcision so hard in Galatians. It isn’t because Torah is bad. It’s because circumcising the nations would undo the gospel announced to Abraham. “…so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles.” (Galatians 3:14)
🤖 Made with AI
10
11
5
56
1,304
This is because Christian theology is taught at the pulpit, not the Bible. Their dogma is so rampant that it won't even allow them to read scripture in any other way than God's law being morning more than ancient history.
Most Christians won’t admit it but they’ve been groomed to despise the “Old Testament” and to reject God’s law. Only if they knew the implications of that
6
30
718
I was looking up flights to Vegas recently and just noticed how expensive flying has become. I haven't been on a plane since 2021. Before that I use to fly almost monthly, and Vegas flights were particularly cheap. What happened!?
1
4
194
Oh no! You made a generalization and I took it personally and now I can't possibly respond to your argument because I just feel so hurt, you worker of iniquity! These people 😂🤦‍♂️
Replying to @themendelbrain
No, I’m thinking you’re a worker of iniquity, accusing me of not keeping God’s Commandments.
1
5
241
Why should gentiles want to have 613 laws instead of just 7? Because they should want an intimate relationship with God, not be content to just get by. Our delight should be in the Torah of the Lord, And in His Torah we all should meditates day and night.
Ben Shapiro urges TPUSA crowd to abide by the Noahide Laws. "If you're not Jewish, all you have to do is fulfill seven basic rules, they're called the Noahide Laws..."
9
4
1
16
848
As we study what it means to be perfect, to be sinless, to be holy, to abide in Christ, just remember that perfect doesn't mean mistake free. However, if you we do make a mistake, then confess and repent. God is faithful to forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Roadmap to Perfection: 1 Covenant (Torah) 2 Temptation (Yetzer) 3 Disobedience (Pesha/Ma'al) 4. Guilt (Avon) 5 Sin seeks you/Sets Snare (Chattath) 6 Repentance/escape snare (Shuv) 7 Sacrifice/Restitution (Chattath/Asham/Kippur) 8 Righteousness (Halak) 9 Spiritual unity (Ruach)
4
1
13
551
Roadmap to Perfection: 1 Covenant (Torah) 2 Temptation (Yetzer) 3 Disobedience (Pesha/Ma'al) 4. Guilt (Avon) 5 Sin seeks you/Sets Snare (Chattath) 6 Repentance/escape snare (Shuv) 7 Sacrifice/Restitution (Chattath/Asham/Kippur) 8 Righteousness (Halak) 9 Spiritual unity (Ruach)
What Did Jesus Mean by “Be Perfect”? “You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matthew 5:48) If this means “never make a mistake,” the standard is impossible. It would be easy to conclude that Jesus was setting us up to fail. But Jesus wasn’t inventing a new ideal. He was teaching something that was already in the Torah. The Greek word Matthew uses is teleios. When Jewish scholars translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, the Septuagint, they used teleios for the Hebrew tamim. Two places stand out: “Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation.” (Genesis 6:9) “You shall be blameless before ADONAI your God.” (Deuteronomy 18:13) In both verses “blameless” is tamim, and the Greek is teleios. Deuteronomy 18:13 sounds very much like Matthew 5:48: “You shall be teleios.” So what is tamim? It does not mean to be flawless. Rather, it means to be whole and undivided. In his commentary on Noah, the 19th-century rabbi Malbim draws a sharp line. Tzaddik (righteous) describes WHAT Noah did. Tamim (blameless) describes WHY he did it. Some people do justice the way a merchant does business, for honor or profit. When the payoff disappears, their righteousness vanishes with it. The tamim person does justice with no ulterior motive, purely out of love for justice and for the sake of God alone. Now read Matthew 5 again. Just before “be perfect,” Jesus describes the Father: “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” He gives without asking what He gets back. Then He describes us: “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” The very next words after “be perfect” make the same point: “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them.” Righteousness with an angle is not tamim. “Be perfect” doesn’t mean “be flawless.” It means be whole. Love and do justice with no hidden motive, the way your Father does. Noah wasn’t sinless. Genesis 9 makes that plain. But he was tamim. Jesus is calling his disciples to be Noahs in their generation.
2
1
8
686
Gotta love the NFL. Giants fumbled the ball during a needless run when they should have just kicked a FG for the win. Washington drives the ball to FG range and runs out of time on a needless play when they should have just kicked a FG for the win. Ended in a tie 😂🤣
103
Most Christians can’t even set aside their own presuppositions to conceptualize a theotetical world without things like Original Sin, let alone engage with the actual nuances of human agency, covenant accountability, or the lexical reality of scripture.
8
1
20
751
Having a discussion is kind of like playing catch. You throw insight at each other to be caught, understood, and tested. Far too often on this app, however, it's more like throwing a ball at a brick wall.
5
18
538
Jacob Mendelsohn retweeted
What Did Jesus Mean by “Be Perfect”? “You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matthew 5:48) If this means “never make a mistake,” the standard is impossible. It would be easy to conclude that Jesus was setting us up to fail. But Jesus wasn’t inventing a new ideal. He was teaching something that was already in the Torah. The Greek word Matthew uses is teleios. When Jewish scholars translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, the Septuagint, they used teleios for the Hebrew tamim. Two places stand out: “Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation.” (Genesis 6:9) “You shall be blameless before ADONAI your God.” (Deuteronomy 18:13) In both verses “blameless” is tamim, and the Greek is teleios. Deuteronomy 18:13 sounds very much like Matthew 5:48: “You shall be teleios.” So what is tamim? It does not mean to be flawless. Rather, it means to be whole and undivided. In his commentary on Noah, the 19th-century rabbi Malbim draws a sharp line. Tzaddik (righteous) describes WHAT Noah did. Tamim (blameless) describes WHY he did it. Some people do justice the way a merchant does business, for honor or profit. When the payoff disappears, their righteousness vanishes with it. The tamim person does justice with no ulterior motive, purely out of love for justice and for the sake of God alone. Now read Matthew 5 again. Just before “be perfect,” Jesus describes the Father: “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” He gives without asking what He gets back. Then He describes us: “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” The very next words after “be perfect” make the same point: “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them.” Righteousness with an angle is not tamim. “Be perfect” doesn’t mean “be flawless.” It means be whole. Love and do justice with no hidden motive, the way your Father does. Noah wasn’t sinless. Genesis 9 makes that plain. But he was tamim. Jesus is calling his disciples to be Noahs in their generation.
🤖 Made with AI
5
11
4
57
3,171
Almost every OSAS believer I speak with openly admits they would actually leave God if they were able to leave. Crazy stuff.
Replying to @themendelbrain
You captured a very important concept. God respect our free will which means He cannot save us against our will. We must deliberate choice daily to remain in Him.
21
1
16
1,194
Christains constantly try to change the Bible with unilateral declarations. Theology is a heck of a drug.
1
9
269
Transgression, trespass, and iniquity are not the same as "sin." Transgression is an action against God. Trespass is an action against each other. Iniquity is the stain it leaves. Committing one of these does not automatically mean you are sinful, but your actions invite sin.
11
1
1
11
977
"Yes, I'll gladly take your money to get my handout" is a pretty ridiculous attitude. I tend to like boomers in the real world, but boomers on this app are on another level. 😂
74
If OSAS was a movie, it would be Obsession. Synopsis: God subverts your will, locks the doors, and whispers, "You didn’t choose Me, I chose you… and you can NEEEEVER leave." 😱
1
1
2
6
656
Jacob Mendelsohn retweeted
Replying to @themendelbrain
In Genesis God combined the heavenly “Neshemah” (breath of life) with the earthly “adamah” (red soil / ochre) and the result was “a living soil”. The Messiah’s example demonstrates that the resurrection that precedes eternal life unites the heavenly and earthly. The Platonic fallacy of the continual warfare between the Spirit and the Physical is alien to scripture. Paul teaches it is the “carnal mind” (fallen thinking) that is at enmity with God not the “physical body”. Gnostics embraced Plato’s philosophy which is why The Apostles emphasized that when men denied the Messiah “came in the flesh” (a Gnostic / Platonic false doctrine) they were not speaking from the Holy Spirit. The walk of the Christ-follower is to manifest the Kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven, not to “go to heaven” to escape the earth. There is a big difference.
1
1
1
53