
Helping Professionals break into Private Equity | Strategic Advisor & Sparring Partner to PortCo Execs | 25Y in PE & Family Office Principal | 100+M&A $1B raise
USA
Joined February 2024
- Tweets20.2K
- Following266
- Followers750
- Likes19K
Your thesis gets evaluated when you are not in the room.
A sponsor forwards it to two partners. They scan it.
You are not there to explain the gap or defend anything.
The scan holds or it does not.
The work is done when the thesis stands up in a room you're not in.
Financial engineering alone is dead.
PE boards now ask one question: "Who can actually run this thing?"
They don't want frameworks or consultant-speak.
They want proof you've fixed broken operations.
Not a deck explaining how you would.
The tell is not that an operator cuts.
The tell is that cutting is the only move they have, and it was the only move at the last company too.
One lever gets reached for regardless of what the business needs. That is a capability limit, visible in a track record.
Roughly $1.3 trillion of buyout dry powder is raised and not deployed. Over 40% of it has been sitting two years or longer.
That capital carries a clock.
Fewer deals, more operational complexity per deal. Every one of them needs an operator on the ground.
SG&A reduction converts into a figure a committee approves. Dollar amount, date, owner.
Augmentation has none of those. So it does not get written down, does not get resourced, does not happen.
Thirty years of offshoring ran on exactly this math.
I sat in the investment committee where the AI line got cut.
Not argued down. Cut.
Two AI items in the plan. One had a named owner, a branch count, a margin number. One was a headcount line.
The headcount line survived the meeting.
The fastest portco value creation I have watched came from an operator who sat alongside the leadership team, not above it.
Tribal knowledge stayed in the building. PE-caliber operating experience came in from outside.
No permanent hire on the cap table.
PE firms do not bring in an operating partner because the team failed.
They bring one in because the problem in front of the team is one the team has never faced.
The ops VP who ran it well for eight years has never run a post-acquisition integration.
I watched a PE firm take apart a 40-year manufacturing business in 18 months.
The firm had every financial metric it needed and none of the operational knowledge.
Nobody on the deal team had walked the floor before the decisions got made.
A frozen thesis and a moving business is not a disagreement.
It is a countdown.
The CEOs who survive reset early with data instead of excuses, and force agreement on sequencing before the drift hardens
The rare thing in a finance leader is not analytical horsepower.
It is the operator who can zoom in and zoom out in the same week.
I have hired across dozens of portfolio companies. For years I thought I wanted smart people who could learn. I wanted people who execute faster
Small decisions compound faster than strategic ones.
AR collections tightened this week frees six figures next quarter. Vendor terms renegotiated today become a stronger position in six months.
Neither is a strategic move. Both show up in the exit multiple.
In a lower middle market portco the CFO fixes the mess Monday and presents to the board Tuesday.
One finance leader builds the model and presents three options.
The other builds the model, picks the right option, and implements it that afternoon.
That is not intelligence.
When a PE-backed board asks what you would do in your first 90 days, they are not listening for ambition.
They are listening for judgment.
The wrong answer sounds like this. I would come in, assess the situation, and build relationships.
Here is the answer that lands.
Roughly 80% of Operating Partner and Board Director seats fill through warm introduction before anything is posted.
A partner deploying capital does not write a job description. He calls someone he trusts.
If you are not in that call, you do not exist.
I have sat on more than a dozen private company boards.
When a portco hits year five or six without hitting its value creation targets, the GP does not call a banker.
They call an operator. Someone who can find the margin the last team booked as overhead
Your resume says what you have done.
Your Investment Thesis says what you will do, in the language a partner uses to underwrite.
PE firms only care about the second one.
An executive with a thesis is an asset. An executive with a resume is a cost.
Your thesis gets evaluated when you are not in the room.
A sponsor forwards it to two partners. They scan it. You are not there to add color or defend anything.
The scan holds or it does not.
Time does not measure when the work is finished. The bar does
They do not want a framework. They want proof you have fixed broken operations.
The gap between a clean IC model and execution reality is where good deals go to die.
Nobody is impressed by capital structure anymore.
What I would tell you in a board meeting, weekly.
thegregheadnl.com
thegregheadpe.com
Financial engineering alone is dead.
From the board seat I watch partners ask one question now. Who can actually run this thing.
What they mean is narrower. Will this person de-risk the investment and pull the exit forward
Twenty-five years of this, one edition at a time.
thegregheadnl.com
thegregheadpe.com



















