You could always just make your own content, instead of pasting your personal kinks onto mine
It is rather impressive to churn out a fabricated post with such an unimaginative, lackluster concept/caption: I’ve seen ai slop with a deeper sense of eroticism
Please tag me next time you have ideas on how my work should be presented 🤍
This quoted post is unavailable.
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
I’ve been a sex therapist in training for 2 months and one thing I’ve learned is that your BDSM personality quietly reveals your relationship needs.
Brat, sub, rope bunny, prey, switch, masochist none of it is just “bedroom stuff.” It’s your attachment style with the volume turned up.
Brats need a partner who can play back instead of shutting them down.
Subs need steady guidance, not power games.
Rope bunnies are looking for trust and clear structure.
Prey wants intentional pursuit.
Switches need room to move.
Masochists want full attention and intensity.
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
What’s a polite way to tell someone, “I’m not discussing this with you because your entire understanding of the subject is built on so many interconnected misconceptions that correcting them would require uninstalling your current worldview and starting the tutorial from birth”?
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
my autistic lawyer dad has been a lawyer for like 30yrs and he just admitted he didnt realize lawyers lied hes like but thats literally not allowed.
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
if you're a pervert it's extremely important to have actual pervert friends to discuss all this stuff with and not just a twitter account full of followers wanting to fuck you
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
My therapist always says “we do not pathologize our desires” and maybe I should actually listen to that
You want a bird's-eye viewing of my rough sex.
I'm getting freaky with strangers like this is Chatroulette 🤭
📸: @thatfckinghimbo
I forgot how fun it is to pose in a thong 🥵
@SHOPjjmalibu
Best quality briefs I’ve had in awhile
@SHOPjjmalibu
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
“I would kill for you.” “I would die for you.”
Yeah, well, I would heal for you. I’d unlearn my toxic patterns, face my wounds, and become a healthier person so my love doesn’t hurt you.
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
Como escribió Dostoyevski; "El amor más profundo es conocer a alguien que ve todo lo que intentaste ocultar y de alguna manera te hace lamentarte de solo una cosa: que alguna vez ocultaste algo." Contigo no hay nada que esconder.
that fʊcking himbo retweeted
Not a great analogy but I hear her.
Back in the day it was easier for women to submit because they didn't really have a choice and marriage was basically the only way to be “secure”. We shouldn't kid ourselves that it was unconditional love. It was conditional then too. The system just made the conditions for them.
Remove that dependency and you find out what was choice and what was constraint. That's where we are now. Women are educated, they're working, a lot of them earn more than us. Of course their view of marriage has changed.
Rami's right that men need to raise the bar. But if the bar is only about providing, a lot of us won't clear it as women keep moving up. It has to be about who you are as a man. How mature you are, how steady you are, how you show up when things are falling apart. You can bring that whether or not you earn more than her.
And I don't think relationships are transactional. They're reciprocal. A transaction falls apart the minute one person can't pay. Reciprocal means sometimes you carry her, sometimes she carries you. When you get there it's less about who submits to who and more about respecting each other.






















