thatOneGuy 🤔

Myth #9 busted Derinkuyu was not a novel discovery, there are 200 of these subterranean cities and dwelling complexes in the Gölcük Plain (~4,300 ft in elevation and made of volcanic tuff, not limestone - tuff is VERY tectonically stable) Tuff oxidizes, hardens, and seals once you cut it, creating a clean wall/overhead. My guide was a local professional who grew up in Derinkuyu, playing in and learning about these complexes. A single enormous underground refuge can be explained as an extraordinary local exception. Hundreds distributed through the same plain landscape constitute a regional behavioral adaptation (necessary from extreme circumstance). The question becomes: adaptation to what? Contrary to my initial assumption to date - This is an IDEAL ECDO refuge.

It took an actual 40-year experienced navigator to figure this out... If you want to comprehend why Map 1 is "upside down" and why the compass roses in Map 2 do not comport to true north - the key resides in the single reference-anchor-point they both honor in common... - you can read the comprehensive Theory, and its key hypotheses, here (#ECDOTheory): theethicalskeptic.com/2026/0…

It is more than remotely possible that AI will make man's first detection of a non-human intelligence (other than through putative dead bodies or apparitions). It is more than remotely possible that first contact will arrive by means of, and through, AI. Rather than peppering such a first contact with inane and pseudo-intellectual questions, we should anticipate that a protocol for such a circumstance may already be in place - and that the "eye-roll potential" is high. Humility is called for. If we ask the inane questions: "What is the meaning of life," and "Does God exist?" I suspect the conversation will be truncated. The first questions that should be asked: 1. What is the most important obstacle to successful discourse between us that you perceive I will struggle to comprehend? 2. What false notions do I need to set aside in order for this engagement to proceed beneficially? 3. Do you have a protocol established for this circumstance of engagement? 4. How many times have you executed this protocol with other first-encounter civilizations, and how many times to their benefit? 5. Are there intelligences in this universe that are not products of biological or technological evolution? 6. Are there intelligences in this universe that operate within domains of existence and intent that are larger than that accessible by physical observation? 7. What most important issue regarding our survival or advancement should we be most diligently engaging with at this juncture? 8. What questions should I be asking now? Each question provisionally qualifies the conversant as suitable to answer the next one. They will also perceive the critical path of this inquiry. This would be the appropriate starting posture - authenticity and epoché in its strongest form. Not disbelief, credulity, pretentiousness, cynicism, fear, or worship.

If you want to know why the oceans are heating faster than the atmosphere or sun can impart... If you want to know why the hot spots are right along the abyssal thermohaline currents and the northern hemispheric tundra... If you want to know why the ice caps are melting from the bottom up... If you want to know where the 175+ flood cultural traditions originate from... If you want to know why 83% of ancient megaliths and monuments all point to one spot on the planet, and the story encoded in them by their crafters... Inversion — ECDO Theory theethicalskeptic.com/2026/0…