AAAAWWOOOOOOOGAAAAAAAAA A high severity vulnerability in "the most widely deployed DNS software on the internet" just dropped kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-943…

Na das werden wunderbare Nachbarkeitsstreitigkeiten wenn die Waschmaschinen und Trockner und Geschirrspülmaschinen in der Nacht auf Hochtouren laufen. Nachtruhe ….. dies das! Oh du vertrotteltes Österreich!

Just focus on the winding quality of these two motors. Left: Donaustahl Motorenwerke 3120 (Date: Feb 2026) Right: ShenZhen ReadyToSky 3115 (Date: June 2026) More details follow soon. There Is No Box

If anyone tries to say the Roadster demo was AI send them the in person cell phone footage. INSANE.

My thoughts on the new Tesla Roadster are mixed. The stunts were truly impressive and congrats to those who made it happen. However, I don't think I'd want that in a car. It will never be road legal, probably nullifying your warranty. And based on the configuration, you are losing too much with just one seat. The 'Thrust' package is probably the best option, but I'm still mad we didn't just get the 2017 Roadster. I feel like the design got worse: we lost half the range, 2 seats, and gained 0.9-sec 0-60 and some downforce. It's cool, but it's nothing like what it was supposed to be. I guess that's Tesla in 2026, ahead of Elon pushing for a merger with SpaceX.

Yup, Alfa Romeo can still do beautiful cars.

Wie kann man technisch so den Anschluss verlieren wie VW? Einstiegsmodelle des neuen VW ID.Tiguan und des technisch nicht mehr ganz frischen Tesla Einstiegmodells. Und Themen wie Software sind in dem Vergleich nicht einmal erfasst.

I'd argue it's worse. My swear word index is over the roof on gpt-6-sol.

Hey spannend. Mein Stromverbrauch am 31. August betrug laut Octopus-Abrechnung / Smartmeter 20,6 kWh. Unwesentliches Detail 1: Ich war im Urlaub Unwesentliches Detail 2: meine zwei eigenen Zähler sagen 0,0 / 0,1 kWh

I went to an rationalist/EA AI doomer event last night with the goal of meeting someone who could calmly explain to me the argument for how they get to the conclusion that AI will kill everyone. Because these are rationalists, I expected to find people who could lay out a serious extinction pathway, walk through the assumptions and intermediate steps, identify choke points where negative pathways could potentially be regulated, and entertain disagreement about where their assumptions might break down. My experience was the exact opposite. The people I spoke to seemed psychologically unable to entertain the possibility that their conclusion (that AI literally kills everyone, which was a point that many would not even budge on) might be wrong. Their most extreme conclusion was treated as an axiom. I had multiple people walk out of conversations with me when I questioned their inevitable extinction premise. At one point during a panel, the moderator asked everyone in the audience who was still skeptical of AI doom to raise their hands. About half the room did. He then told all of the skeptics to leave the panel and go with one of the speakers, who would answer their questions separately. They filtered out all the skeptics, and continued the panel only with the subset who accepted their extreme position. I genuinely felt like a heretic just for questioning whether superintelligent AI inevitably leads to the extinction of humanity, or entertaining the possibility that the future might actually turn out well. That does not mean AI safety is fake. Obviously there are serious questions about rapidly advancing AI systems and what happens as they become much more capable. Those are exactly the conversations I went there hoping to have. But what I encountered was an apocalyptic death cult. These people are not rational. They are deeply afraid, they reinforce that fear in one another, and they have become so emotionally committed to apocalypse that they refuse to be reasoned out of it.

Rye bread is the heart of Finnish culture; these sachertorte nibblers don’t have the same cultural connection to it