A20 Pro with 60hz display
Dynamic island with a track pad
" It's something only apple can do "
- Tim Cook
Kirin 9050 Pro use fused SRAM IP, unlike kirin 9060 Pro which use separate/cut core, which improved the yield noticeably
Remember this shit is ~$300 馃ぃ
8E was 190, then till just before couple of months it reach ~150, I think with the upcoming huge orders it will increase
Same prob with 8E5
Some ppl may ask why snapdragon 8EE6 gb7 efficiency curve is a bit worse when the raw performance is noticeably worse?
CPU team re write the instructions and give to google to optimize it even with weak raw performance, kinda what huawei does
GPU it will get bit better via fw
Replying to @Alpha72188850
Already said, you can see previous posts
8EE7 will continue relay on matrix cores and AI, this gen faces problems with designing node related to cores and writing instructions. The problems will be solved
8EE7 Also use same shared cache, no change, this mean even with others upgrades it will be an 8E/8E5 again with more power draw if they don't increase the clock speed, if Mediatek is a lier then Qualcomm is hypocritical
Using 8E/8E5 till 2028 was reasonable
Elia retweeted
2nm chips packaging ranking:
A20 Pro is using SbS/WMCM
Exynos2700 is using SbS/WMCM
8EE6 is using HPB/Offset PoP
Dimensity 9600 Pro is using HBPoP
Oh yea
If you bought performance snapdragon 8E6 / 8EE6 phone return it or sell it faster and get 8E5/8E before it loses its value
Dimensity 9600 pro performance phones should be up by late q1 or q2 next year
I think I might stop for now
I was about to share interesting news about kirin 9060 but now I think you will not get over 8EE6 after hearing about it
Dimensity 9600 pro outperform snapdragon 8EE6
What do you feel Qualcomm when you just bit better than 9500?
Indeed like I said , the shutdown problems were from voltage
Mr.luke learn a bit before you come talking with me again
@LukeWat48544961
What a scandal!
8g3 medium core perform better than 8EE6
Qualcomm what kinda of d*ru*gs* you were taking
鈽狅笍鈽狅笍鈽狅笍鈽狅笍鈽狅笍鈽狅笍
No real upgrade
It's even worse
Qualcomm get rid of shared cache previously for extra performance and efficiency but they return it this time...
Why? For cost cutting
The only value for is low latency but it's doesn't really affect that much with 8 cores
Replying to @techgeeekboi
Didn't they upgrade the Uarch and Core designs to get better efficiency? This is just plain ole stupidities from qualcomm
It's from the fkn 5.0ghz
It's the same phoenix "Pegasus" core as 8E5, the cpu shrieked massively till to maintain the same gb scores, and up to 5.0ghz thx to GAA design
So you push more performance but efficiency and capabilities didn't improve, so you have to sacrifice low end











