tarun retweeted
Paris Komünü’nün ardından kurşuna dizilen bir komünar şöyle söylüyordu:
“71 gün özgür yaşadım, artık ölüm umrumda değil”
tarun retweeted
NCERT removed the French Revolution from the syllabus, so the French decided to bring it back into current affairs.
tarun retweeted
Me and my 30,000 armed, lathi wielding friends were all alone
It is easy to stand with the crowd, but it takes courage to stand alone
#DPUpdates
tarun retweeted
vivid and excellent illustration of the limits of identity-based feminism when it doesn't include the labour/capital foundation
tarun retweeted
Why is a generation rising in revolt against Modi? And what price are they paying for it?
October 10th through the eyes of four protesters
With my colleague @raghavKakkar30 for @scroll_in
youtu.be/JUSdICy_2l8?si=D-XY…
tarun retweeted
Is it Delhi police’s job to do this? Why are they acting as political workers of the BJP?
How do they know permission won’t be granted for October 10 protests?
tarun retweeted
Security forces, the political ineptness of this govt.
(Picture: @tarunzero ) @thewire_in
tarun retweeted
Will Modi-Shah now impose Disturbed Areas Act and AFSPA at Parliament House and Jantar Mantar?
tarun retweeted
La muerte de Anwar Shaikh supone el adiós del principal economista marxista contemporáneo. Su obra de décadas quedó cristalizada en Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises (2016), que explica con detalle cómo funciona el sistema a través de la “turbulenta competencia real”. Yo destacaría también dos trabajos menos conocidos:
1) Su crítica de la función de producción agregada neoclásica en los setenta, que obligó a Robert Solow a contestar. Shaikh demostró que el buen ajuste econométrico de esas funciones no prueba nada y que es un resultado de una identidad contable. Lo ilustró con datos inventados que dibujaban la palabra HUMBUG (patraña). Es un argumento central, aunque técnico. Pese a ello, los neoclásicos (y buena parte de los economistas) siguen usando esos métodos. Recientemente Jesús Felipe y yo hemos extendido esta crítica a la economía ecológica.
2) Su aportación sobre el comercio exterior y la balanza de pagos. Shaikh sostuvo que el comercio internacional se rige por la ventaja absoluta (Smith) y no por la comparativa (Ricardo) y que los capitales compiten por costes también entre países, con los de menor coste acumulando superávits mientras los demás financian déficits persistentes con deuda. Así obtenía un intercambio desigual sin recurrir, como Emmanuel, a diferencias salariales dadas de antemano. Sus trabajos con @IsabellaMWeber sobre el desequilibrio comercial entre EE. UU. y China son fundamentales para entender la actualidad económica.
En fin, una pérdida inmensa para la economía, para el marxismo y para la clase trabajadora. Que descanse en paz.
tarun retweeted
Sad news.
Today, we lost one of the greatest thinkers of political economy. Rest in peace Anwar Shaikh.
tarun retweeted
"El verdadero fascismo no lleva camisas negras, vende progreso.
La sociedad de consumo logró lo que el fascismo no pudo hacer: borrar culturas, uniformar vidas y destruir Italia sin que nadie se diera cuenta.
El fascismo no fue derrotado, fue reemplazado."
Pier Paolo Pasolini
tarun retweeted
🚨🚨How Adani became a big winner at the NCLT: 16 of 26 bids won.
Across the 16 acquisitions, creditors recovered about Rs 33,000 crore against admitted claims of Rs 1.31 lakh crore. In several cases, the bidding process changed along the way ~ deep dive by @SavyasachiAstha.
newslaundry.com/2026/09/25/a…
tarun retweeted
#SupremeCourt turns off the audio while the hearing on Noida DM Medha's matter challenging Allahabad HC's direction to pay Rs. 5 lac from salary to the student illegally detained in Noida protest matter going on.
#BREAKING #SupremeCourt to hear today Nodia DM Medha Roopam's plea against Allahabad High Court's direction that Rs 5 Lakh compensation must be recovered from her personal salary to be given to the student who was illegally detained under the National Security Act over the Noida workers' protest.
A bench of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice NK Singh will hear the matter.
tarun retweeted
Investigation of the year by @RitikaChopra__. We now know that the disquiet over SIR wasn’t just an Opposition concern. Election Commissioners themselves objected to some of its most alarming decisions, at one point calling it “harassment of young voters”
Gyanesh Kumar chose to sideline those objections — one of the reports in the series looks at new addition to Form 6 that required new voters to provide details of whether their parents appeared on electoral rolls from the previous SIR. This single change wreaked havoc on the ground. So many people forced to queue up and produce documents to prove their link to decades-old voter lists. It now turns out there were objections to this requirement from within the EC itself calling it illegal.
tarun retweeted
🧵: Delhi SIR has brought half of the city's voting population under suspicion under one strike.
Let me explain: Before SIR, Delhi had 1.45 crore voters.
ECI has since deleted 47.6 lakh of them and sent notices to 31.6 lakh more.
Who would suffer the most? 1/n
tarun retweeted
A personal and professional note.
I have personally felt bored, tired, and irritated over the last couple of years, sitting in rooms that endlessly discuss how bad the state of Indian journalism is and the challenges it faces. It does. But there is so much to be done.
I feel we are also living a new phase of Indian journalism. One with hope and innovation. One that can be done with much lower capital investment, with much more rigour and by a more diverse set of people. I am happier discussing and sharing how we can do more of it and what is already happening. And there is so much of it already happening that we must spend our energies building on it.
In parallel, at The Reporters' Collective @reporters_co, largely driven by my co-trustee @journomayank, we have asked what practices can make us a better collective, and not just a better newsroom. Three answers to it have been simple:
1. We must pay fair remuneration, and the best possible for us as a Collective, to courageous journalists who undertake investigative journalism. We pay a base rate of Rs 40,000 plus reporting and legal costs at TRC for commissioned work. We pay interns, translators, local journalists in distant areas who support us, and everyone else who works with us. Everyone's labour is (and should be) recognised. This is the bare minimum.
2. We must share even our modest financial resources with the larger fraternity, even as we struggle to collect donations for TRC's team and work. Through fellowships and awards, we have instituted a range of them over the past six months.
3. Even as we learn at work (and we are learning a lot everyday), we must share what we have learnt from doing our journalism - our skills, our methods and approach. Gatekeeping has been the bane of Indian journalism. It must end.
For some years, we have been informally helping fraternal colleagues from other newsrooms do their investigations, when and if they approach us. But that meant supporting a few sporadically.
So, when some donors told us they would donate to support us in training journalists across the country for investigative reporting, we jumped at the opportunity. They had read our hearts.
Funded by citizens, we have begun undertaking training for courageous journalists from across the country (not just the metropolitan towns).
We have three or four larger purposes in mind, besides sharing the skills we deploy at The Reporters' Collective.
1. Show with proof that younger journalists can undertake investigative reportage given the opportunity and resources; it's no quantum physics. We can all do it.
2. Working journalists at TRC share their methods and skills (not just older grey beards like me), so we all learn to share and build a community.
3. We exchange learnings. There are brave journalists working outside metropolitan towns, whom we want to learn from and work with. There are young colleagues who are more capable in deploying new forms and technology (such as Insta and AI) for good journalism. We want to learn from them too.
4. We enable other fraternal colleagues through solid legal support (and not just fellowships) to deal with the tough legal terrain that we tread during investigative work.
Here 👇 is a glimpse of our first intensive 3-day workshop on investigative reporting held for journalists from all northern and central states.
Given the resources, we want to do more such intensive workshops across the country. We are keen to do one for colleagues in southern states and another in the northeast of India.
If you think this is a worthwhile adventure, please fund The Reporters' Collective. Enable us to support other courageous journalists.
Also, do tell us how we can do this better.
Donate at reporters-collective.in/supp…








































