Software engineer at Coursera. Gaymer. Would like the world to be less on fire. He/Him

Sunnyvale, CA
Joined July 2010
Two things can simultaneously be true: 1. Democratic *politicians* need to meet voters where they are in order to win elections. 2. Democratic *non-politicians* who consider yourselves to be allies need to convince your friends and family to be better than this on these issues.
the idea that you can just keep hitting the “be more economically left wing” button in hopes that voters will not notice you have positions on social/cultural issues they strongly disagree with is honestly quite condescending
1
3
373
The fiscal impact of bills is computed on a 10-year horizon. Discussion of the impact is sometimes on a 10-year horizon, and sometimes with annual numbers. This often results in mix-ups (possibly intentional, possibly not), like this "plan" where money out = 10x money in.
Per them, this would raise roughly $405 billion in 2026. Let's just tackle the first policy - roughly 260M Americans live in households that make <$150k/yr. To give each $3k/yr, that's $786 billion. You actually cannot make a strong welfare state by only taxing 1000 people!
1
56
Singling out gay men as responsible for this when we are one of the demographics who are most supportive of trans rights and who most reliably voted Democratic is both homophobic and victim blaming.
196
“What makes sense for the government to operate” is a genuinely interesting question, and shouldn’t be squashed into a binary of “more” vs “less”
2
1
25
2,218
A play in 3 acts
1
158
Happy Pride Month! A reminder that we queer folk have to pay a premium on housing in order to live in places that offer housing protection: redfin.com/news/lgbtq-housin… A great way to be an impactful ally is to support building more housing in these places.
1
1
77
Conversely, allyship rings hollow if you oppose building more housing in these areas. What's the point of housing protections if there's no more room for us in the first place? @aishabbwahab
23
It's do or die for SB 79, the bill that would legalize multifamily housing around rail and BRT stops across the state. The vote could be held as early as Monday morning. Californians: call your state senator tomorrow morning to help us get out of the senate!
23
44
7
216
18,683
Hey @Vanguard_Group I don't think the kinds of people who hold ESG ETFs would be happy to see this
92
Ironically, this is something covered in introductory STEM classes that the DOGEheads and their defenders are getting wrong.
Each person sending all their "good cause" money to one place which aggregates them and then sends them in batches to each org is way more efficient than each person giving a tiny amount to each org.
84
This has gotten more attention than I expected, so I thought I'd try to explain the concepts behind this paper to a broader audience. First, let's imagine a simpler case: no airlines, no corporate profits, etc., I just really need to get from A to B and the plane costs $1200. 🧵
2
1
5
2,989
The calculation is somewhat different when you just maximize revenue, but ironically it becomes closer to the single-plane scenario when we switch to maximizing profit, since an airline will simply not offer a flight if it can only operate at a loss.
1
160
Taking a step back, it's important to be able to break down how much of a phenomenon happens due to corporate greed and how much of it emerges from consumer behavior. Even if we agree a phenomenon is bad, if we do not take the time to understand it first, we cannot fix it.
2
147