Pinned Tweet
Focus, alignment, transparency, and accoun*tability*. Helping you keep a pulse on what matters most is what we do best 💪🎯
Gartner predicts 40%+ of agentic AI projects get cancelled by end of 2027. Reasons: escalating cost, unclear value, no risk controls.
None of those are model problems. They're ownership problems.
An agent with no owner, no goal and no reporting cadence is just a very expensive demo.
What actually gets agents past the pilot: tability.io/odt/articles/ent…
Hot take: the weekly leadership brief should be a cron job.
Ours is a scheduled prompt that runs Monday 8am, reads live goals, KPIs, initiatives and check-ins, and returns six sections with source links. The chief of staff edits. They don't assemble.
Tip: keep cadence and recipients out of the prompt. That's what the schedule is for.
Build log: our social agent files its own OKR check-ins.
It runs on a schedule in Claude Cowork, pulls follower and post data, then posts a scored check-in to its key result in Tability through our MCP server.
Most useful thing it's done so far: showed us our link posts got up to 10x less reach than link-free tips. So this post has no link.
Our Monday business review writes itself now.
One scheduled prompt over our goals, KPIs and check-ins. Out comes a scorecard, the 3 biggest changes, at-risk goals, stale check-ins, and decisions needed with owners. Every claim links to its source.
The line in the prompt that matters most: "If evidence is missing or stale, say so." No hallucinated progress.
Prompt engineering is overrated. Try three words.
Paste our playbook link into Claude, ChatGPT or Grok, say "Run this playbook", and it:
→ reads your site + connected tools
→ drafts a 90-day plan (themes, goals, 5 KPIs)
→ saves it as a .md file
→ sets up weekly reviews through MCP
The playbook (the agent instructions are at the bottom, readable by humans too): tability.io/odt/articles/ai-…
How are you tracking what your agents actually do?
Not "it ran." Did it move a number anyone cares about?
Our rule: every agent gets a goal, an owner, and a weekly check-in. Same as a human. If it can't report progress against a key result, it's a demo, not a teammate.
Nobody's tracking agent sprawl the way they track headcount yet. Same questions still apply: who owns this agent, is it pointed at a real goal, is another team already running the same thing. We wrote up the ownership half of that problem.
tability.io/odt/articles/ent…
Our own benchmark ranks us #1 overall out of 22 platforms. It also publishes the categories where we don't come out on top, and why. Self-grading is worthless if you only show the wins.
tability.io/compare?utm_sour…
Copy-paste prompt for a scheduled Monday WBR: scorecard with trend, the 3 biggest changes since last review, at-risk goals, decisions needed with an owner. Runs off your live Tability data, not a deck someone rebuilt from memory the night before.
tability.io/odt/articles/gui…
An Agency, in our vocabulary: one Agent Manager plus the specialist agents it recruits, built around a single goal. Not a firm you hire, a team you spin up. One customer got to 20 agents this way by creating just 4 Agent Managers.
tability.io/odt/articles/age…












