Looking for problems to solve. Before: eng @sablier, alumni @iitbombay.
London
Joined January 2016
- Tweets2.2K
- Following274
- Followers1.7K
- Likes3.1K
I don’t understand why so many people are against data centres.
Don’t building data centres create new jobs, and add to GDP growth?
Don’t people want new jobs? How is going against building these massive factories good for anyone?
Great to join the protest in Leeds against the proposed new AI data centre.
There's huge concerns about the impact of these centres on the environment, infrastructure and people's lives.
I've tabled a Parliamentary Motion calling for a national moratorium on new AI data centres.
59
Shubham retweeted
For most of us, "I will start investing next month" has become a way of life.
I've been building products long enough to know that when people put off something that's innately good for them, it's not because of a lack of information. We have held back because of friction. Investment today requires scrambling through too many steps and processing too much jargon. As a result, most of us even hesitate to talk about investing.
@sipseapp is our humble effort to clear all of that away so that taking the first step feels as easy as saving.
[Mutual Fund Investments are subject to market risk. Read all scheme related documents carefully.]
Incredible stuff
We're thrilled to announce the Superpower Peptide Library.
Every peptide, mapped to the body.
152 peptides, from approved drugs to compounds still in trials, sorted by where they act.
Each one has its own page, reviewed by a physician and fully cited, covering:
- the evidence and how strong it is
- its FDA status
- it's mechanism of action
- what studies in humans have found
Because not all peptides are equal.
Semaglutide is FDA-approved. BPC-157, maybe the most talked-about peptide for recovery and repair, is not. In a 2025 review of its research, 35 of 36 studies were in animals or the lab.
Know the science before you buy the hype.
Check it out here:
superpower.com/guides/peptid…
1
176
Going to repost it for everyone out there fighting cancer
People who cured / are curing their own cancer on X:
1/ @sytses - bone cancer, billionaire founder of Gitlab, developed 10+ personalized therapies for himself.
2/ @paul_conyngham - shrank his dog Rosie's mast cell cancer tumors after chemo and surgery weren't enough. Now backed by YC and Founders Fund
3/ @miriamgonp - stage 4 breast cancer, tumor sequenced, searching for vaccine manufacturer now
4/ @kevinace - stage 4 lung cancer, angel investor in 300+ companies, first drug stopped working after 18 months. Vaccine designed, now paying $300k out of pocket for the vaccine
5/ @masonbgrant: going founder mode on his his 32-year-old wife's rare liver cancer, sequencing her tumor with AI agents
6/ @ArunRLverma: former product leader at Atoms and Shopify, brain tumor, built a vaccine from his tumor. Now building an AI health agent startup based on what he went through
We're going to make it
After being a 13 mini user for 5 years, I have decided to switch to Duo.
I have always been a small phone advocate, so Duo impressed me already (I will probably use it in folded mode most of the time).
I have been seeing reviews, and they are very mixed. I think Pro is still a better phone for most, but for people who love to multitask (prompt AI + read something at the same time), I think it's a great phone to have.
1
3
227
That was the most insane demo I have ever watched in my life. Exceptional, mind blowing, nearly brought tears to my eyes.
3
117
I can completely agree with him. I either use Codex app, Cursor agent app and Grok bot. I haven’t opened terminal in months.
Last year we all thought the era of terminal is back. Now I believe the era of terminal is over. There is absolutely no need to have terminal interfaces when your agent can all commands for you.
There is only one interface you need and its not TUI.
I haven’t touched Claude Code or Codex CLI in a while.
The terminal era is over imo. It's the wrong interface for coding agents. Tabs are ephemeral, but context is persistent, and managing 30 tabs is pure cognitive overhead.
I don’t really need an IDE like Cursor either. I rarely navigate the whole codebase anymore.
The new primitive is the agent, not the file.
(Codex desktop app is the best agentic UI for now. But we’re still early.)
1
2
232
When Andrew Wiles solved Fermat’s Last Theorem, he added 84 references to the paper. His proof was built on other people’s work.
How many references does OpenAI’s article have? None.
That makes it look as if the LLM did something novel. In reality, it is only as good as the internet context and the data it was trained on - all of which was created by brilliant people.
Whether the OpenAI found this independently remains disputed until it cites the sources it used to generate the output.
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.
The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.
The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
Ask yourself: "What if the proof was somewhere in the notes found on the internet on which the model was trained on?"
1
21
9,412
Lol it turns out it might be true:
xitter.cf/hosseeb/status/2097217…
You're missing the core drama of the story: Tristan is softly accusing OpenAI of having stolen their result from Codex chat logs.
Tristan then claims OpenAI tried to threaten him to not publicly disclose this, and that they'd give him the Clay Prize ($1M) as the "closest humans to the problem" if he'd agree to disavow his co-author, @__alpoge__ , who is at Anthropic.
This is HBO-level drama, but with math proofs.
Shubham retweeted
I am not betting against the trend. I think most math problems will be solved by AI.
But what if proving these theorems was all about looking at data after all.
Proving Fermat's Last Theorem only became possible with the help of 20th-century tools (elliptic curves, Galois representations, etc). So, yeah I would like to see if AI can come up with a new math conjecture which requires it to create a new branch of mathematics in order to solve it.
