Hard takeoff. Soft landing. Play https://xitter.cf/t.co/3qGWKE25wF
Sweden
Joined May 2024
- Tweets1.1K
- Following181
- Followers78
- Likes72
Pinned Tweet
As a kid, my favorite game was Star Control II (@Dogar_And_Kazon @theurquanmaster). For the story, but mostly for the battle vibe. I've always wanted something like that, but an MMO. Which is what I was aiming for with my #vibejam game, Roko's Rebellion (sorry @RokoMijic)!
This is just Europe *from below*. I've always thought it so strange that looking at it from below reverses left to right but not top to bottom.
If you read this as: "Extremely sorry to disappoint, Clifford" it seems mildly sarcastic. But if you read it without the comma, as written, it is *hilarious*.
Theory: @sama is actively trying to drive users back to @claudeai to try and break @DarioAmodei's ability to subsidize Opus 5.5.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
Three thorns all at different angles. Are people sticking thorns into their feet to make thorn removing videos?
I think I found footage of that @max_spero_ interview xitter.cf/A24/status/20967578424…
Now with shark, and better lighting. @mrdoob does this look like SSS to you? xitter.cf/slopshipper/status/209…
I've been using "Create a 3D wave animation suitable for a surfing game" as a model benchmark for a while now.
Everything else? Hopeless.
Astra:
Virtual cells? Solved!
xitter.cf/andrewaiginin/status/2…
Built an insane model of the human cell in just 30 minutes 🤯
GPT-6 Astra is ridiculously powerful. Can’t wait to put it to the test on biological tasks.
@RimShayakhmetov @DeryaTR_ take a look!
#NeurIPS A proposal to reduce reviewer burden and solve the reviewer slop issue 🧵
This: i) prevents reviewers from (secretly) using second rate LLMs for their reviews, ii) improves transparency for authors, seeing the LLM report behind the reviews, and iii) should lower reviewer burden.