Physicist, audio design. Clifford Algebra & QM. Unv@xed. Keto since 1999. Silva Method,TRV, Pagan Trinity.
Buckhorn Ontario Canada
Joined October 2008
- Tweets29.8K
- Following1.2K
- Followers896
- Likes37.9K
Pinned Tweet
Błeszyńscy = drobna szlachta z PL środkowo zach., Sieradz Kalisz. Ostatnio odkryłem starsze ślady sprzed XIV wieku, potwierdzajace te które spaliły się u dziadka na Poznańskiej w1944. Nazywali się Werszowcy od Czeskiej wymowy słowa Vrše ( Ursi) Ród możno władczy posiadający grody Warszawa i Solec. Przyszli z Czech. Pierwszy herb: Rawicz, a później po utracie (konfiskacie) Warszawy około 1330 zmienili nazwisko na Błachy ( = Włosi ) i herb na Oksza i Suche Komnaty. Po 1330-tych latach musieli sie ukrywać bo mężczyźni Werszowcy byli częścią Zakonu Templariauszy, co wiem na podstawie pieczęci jakiej używali. Nigdy potem, po delegalizacji Zakonu, żaden Błeszyński nie zajmował więcej stanowisk państwowych/królewskich, o ile wiem! – at Curve Lake First Nation 35, Ontario
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Entire fantastic article by BRENDA POWER below (the rest in comments)
Liberal Woman Who’s The Emblem of French Plight
AN ELEGANT Parisian woman in a chestnut wool coat, sunglasses perched on the black headband in her long blonde hair, stands at the door of a ruined grocery shop as masked looters descend upon it.
She is every privileged, middle-class, thirtysomething Western woman you’ve ever seen at a pro-Palestinian, pro-immigrant march, wearing a keffiyeh and waving a 'Refugees Welcome' placard, chanting, 'From the river to the sea'.
Madame Everywoman has so despaired of the bigotry of the far right, and denounced the vile racism of the fascist commentators warning that Europe is being 'invaded' by Islamists, seeking to overrun and replace the continent’s indigenous population.
She has applauded the sight of blue-eyed policing on city streets across France, the UK, Italy, Germany as heart-twinging evidence of 'multiculturalism'. She’s supported the introduction of more halal outlets, even though the Islamic slaughter method is cruel and bloody, and welcomed the neutralisation of backward old Christian observances like Christmas and Easter into 'winter' and 'spring' festivals.
She’s supported bans on dogs being walked in certain parts of Paris because Islam considers them unclean, thinks burkas are an expression of female will, and insists that immigrants from non-Christian cultures enrich, energise and enlighten our home-grown Western societies. Unless they’re Jews, obviously.
And until that is, they active masked and such-handed to 'enlighten' the shelves of her friends' grocery store of all their goods — taking alcohol test, in many cases, leaving only the 'haram' pork products strewn on the floor — and enriching only themselves. The footage of Madame Everywoman coming face-to-spitting, seething face with the culture she has championed has circled the globe over the last few days, as the French riots spread countryside and beyond. 'This is not the cause,' she pleads with the masked looters, nearly all young men, as they push past her to ransack the store.
She has supported them, she wails, she is on their side, she shares their ideology, they have the same objectives of liberty, equality, peace, prosperity — burning and looting shops in dire suburbs was never in the script.
They push her aside, tell her clear off if she doesn’t want to get hurt, she turns to the camera, the picture of anguished realisation dawning just a little too late, a human metaphor for modern, liberal, progressive Europe’s tardy awakening to the medieval fate it has unwittingly sealed — there is no shared ideology, there is no political conviction, there’s no noble aspiration or mutual goal, just a brutal, marauding horde with no objective but to pillage and destroy, and nothing in their hearts but well-deserved contempt for useful Western idiots like Madame Everywoman and her keffiyeh-toting ilk. If asunder empathy has a face, it’s that elegant Parisian woman in her chic headband, her expensive coat and her utter bewilderment.
These protests are far more than shout poor educational facilities.
Pictures of thugs fleeing Christian Dior and Louis Vuitton stores with armfuls of designer clothing appear online, satirically captioned, 'French students desperately seeking new school uniforms.'
Now they are just a sinister flex by a menacing cohort which has steadily infiltrated western Europe over the past decade, exploiting colonial guilt, the positive, preening vanity that passes for political debate on social media, and the witless purity spiralling of liberal competitive wokeness.
Five years ago, it would have been considered a hate crime to suggest that while most migrants were genuinely well-intentioned people simply hoping for a better life, there was a significant number from incompatible cultures driven by envy and hatred of Western liberties, whose aim was to despoil, plunder and subjugate the liberal societies ...cont in comments
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Fauci’s diary, June 19, 2021: chest CT showed a definite pulmonary infarct. They put him on Eliquis.
Pulmonary infarct means part of the lung died from blocked blood flow. The usual cause is a pulmonary embolism. (PE)
He got the Moderna shot on camera December 22, 2020. Six months later his own notes document dead lung tissue and blood thinner necessity.
While he was telling the country the shots were “safe and effective,” he was being anticoagulated for a lung clot and said nothing.
Who else has experienced clots after vaccination? Can you imagine how many people haven’t disclosed?
God bless
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Elon Musk writes: "Johann Sebastian Bach is the Shakespeare of music. Best there ever was."
He's right. And the comparison tells us where both stand in our civilization. Bach is everything the West believed about order, freedom and work, put into sound.
1. They are not in the canon. They are what the canon is measured against. Shakespeare shaped the language; Bach shaped harmony. Everyone after them builds on top of them, knowingly or not. They are not great artists among others. They are the ground the others stand on.
2. Together they cover the two halves of the West. Shakespeare is man as he is: ambition, jealousy, doubt, the individual alone with his passions. Bach is order as it should be: everything held together, everything pointing up. Shakespeare is the West looking at itself. Bach is the West looking up.
3. Order and freedom. Listen to a fugue. Several voices, each singing its own line, none a backing track for the others – and yet they fit perfectly. That is the West in sound: free individuals inside a common order. The crowd sings in unison. Citizens sing in counterpoint. And the fugue has the strictest rules in music, yet Bach found more freedom inside them than anyone. Freedom is not the absence of rules. It is mastery of them.
4. Work. He was not a tortured genius. He was an employee. A church musician, a new cantata almost every week, twenty children, arguments with the town council about pay. No lightning from heaven, no romantic suffering. Genius as a daily job, done well, for decades – and done for something higher than himself.
5. And it matters who said it: an engineer, not a critic. Bach is the engineer's composer – a fugue is a machine with a soul. When the man building rockets points to Bach, he's pointing at the same Western habit: making order that is also beautiful.
6. Civilizations are remembered by their heights. Nobody remembers the average Athenian; we remember Aristotle. Summits show what humans are capable of, and they set the bar for every generation after. A civilization that stops climbing still has its summits – for a while. Then it forgets why anyone climbed. The West almost forgot Bach. After his death, the public lost him. Eighty years later a twenty-year-old Mendelssohn performed the St. Matthew Passion in Berlin, and the world remembered. The greatest treasure of a civilization was one young man away from oblivion. The torch changes hands or it doesn't. This is what Musk keeps warning about: civilizations don't fall in one blow. They forget.
7. In 1977, when humanity sent a golden record into space to tell the universe who we are, the music opened with Bach. A scientist joked that we should send all of Bach – but that would be boasting. The record carries the music to the stars. That also needs to be carried forward.
Shakespeare tells us who we are. Bach tells us what we're for. Forget them, and we will know neither.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Skoro wraca temat aborcji to rząd Tuska musi robić bokami. Koncówka. Oczywiście będzie veto i ustawa trafi do kosza. Ale nie chodzi o zmianę, lecz o wrzask.
Sejm opowiedział się za zabijaniem nienarodzonych dzieci. Zabrakło kilku głosów do odrzucenia morderczych przepisów – udziału w głosowaniu nie wzięli między innymi J. Kaczyński i S. Mentzen
Sejm przegłosował – głosami posłów koalicji rządzącej – dwa projekty ograniczające prawną ochronę życia, w myśl których chce wrócić do zabijania poczętych dzieci, kiedy pojawia się podejrzenie ciężkiej choroby. Rządząca większość chce także odejść od karania za pomocnictwo, co w praktyce oznacza tzw. aborcję na życzenie. Koalicja wprost zignorowała wiążące orzeczenie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 2020 roku.
Lewica i Koalicja Obywatelska chcą likwidacji kar za pomoc w tzw. aborcji. Obecnie za nakłanianie lub pomoc matce w zabiciu nienarodzonego dziecka grozi do trzech lat więzienia. Jeśli dziecko byłoby zdolne do samodzielnej egzystencji, to kara sięga już ośmiu lat.
Zmiany mają też dotyczyć udzielania tzw. środków poronnych, co potwierdziła minister Katarzyna Kotula z Lewicy :
– W tej ustawie rzeczywiście jest aborcja farmakologiczna, a 95 proc. kobiet dziś w ten sposób przerywa ciążę – samodzielnie w domu – mówił Katarzyna Kotula, pełnomocnik rządu ds. równości.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Most political conversations should start with the words:
"You are a mental communist. The world doesn't work like that."
Why?
Because the people who go into politics and journalism alike are the ones who have a model of the world in their head – and want to enforce it.
Every model is wrong. It is a model, not reality. But they are also the people with neither the humility nor the intelligence to recognize that. These people are proud.
The engineer tests his model against reality. When the bridge cracks, he changes the model. The farmer, the doctor, the shopkeeper, the mother of four – reality corrects them every single day.
The mental communist does the opposite. When reality doesn't fit the model, he changes reality. A new law, a new ministry, a new program – and when that fails too, a bigger one.
Hayek explained why the worst get on top: the power to plan other people's lives attracts those most certain they know how others should live, and the system rewards them for it. The humble don't run for office or write editorials. They build things.
In Poland we had a whole state run by people with a model of the world. The world didn't work like that. The shelves were empty.
So we need two things. Put people into politics who have met reality – who built something, ran something, paid for their own mistakes. And give whoever is in charge as little power as possible, because every model is wrong, and the damage grows with the power behind it.
The best politician is the one who knows his model is wrong – and therefore wants as little power as possible to enforce it.
So yes, start the conversation with this: "You are a mental communist. The world doesn't work like that."
Then show him how it does.
Pride – The Engineers of Human Souls.
Pride is not the craftsman’s satisfaction in good work. That kind of pride built cathedrals.
Pride is the certainty that you know better than other people how they should live.
Pride is looking at a society and seeing a machine – with yourself as the engineer.
Pride is impatience with reality. Reality is slow, messy, full of people who want different things. So pride replaces it with a plan.
Pride "loves" humanity and despises people. Humanity never argues back.
Pride is blind in one specific way: it cannot see what it does not know. Hayek called it the fatal conceit – the belief that a few clever people can know what millions know, each about his own work, his own family, his own street.
Pride wears the mask of compassion. "For your own good" – the most dangerous words in politics. C.S. Lewis warned that the worst tyranny is the one exercised sincerely for the good of its victims – because its enforcers sleep with a clear conscience.
Pride never admits a mistake. A failed plan was sabotaged, betrayed, underfunded – never wrong. So the next plan is bigger.
And pride never lives in its own design. The architect of the housing estate lives in the old town. The reformer of the school sends his children somewhere else. The planner never pays for his plan.
Now scale it up. Plato’s ideal city abolished the family among its rulers and told the people a useful lie. The French revolutionaries redesigned even the clock – ten hours a day; it lasted barely a year and a half. Trotsky promised that under socialism the average man would rise to the level of Aristotle, Goethe or Marx; what came out was a man queuing for bread and informing on his neighbor. Le Corbusier wanted to raze the heart of Paris for identical towers; his ideas shaped the grim estates on the edge of every European city – designed for a new man, inhabited by real ones. Today the same pride works in committees, redesigning language, the family and what children must learn about themselves. Quieter than a revolution. The same certainty.
The West’s best tradition starts from the opposite place. Socrates: the wisest man knows that he does not know. Chesterton: never take down a fence until you know why it was put up. Society is not a machine. It is a living thing – grown, not built. The statesman should be a gardener, not an engineer.
A free society does not abolish pride. It converts it: be as proud as you like of what you build – your house, your company, your family – and let reality judge it. The planner is proud of what he designs for everyone else, and never has to live in it.
The cure is the oldest one: know what you don’t know. And let people live their own lives.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Tout ce qui se passe en ce moment, je vais vous faire la liste des archétypes du gauchiste. Le top 10, pour les reconnaître en société avant qu'ils vous expliquent la vie.
La fille bourgeoise d'Instagram. Appart haussmannien payé par papa, stories sur la lutte des classes depuis un rooftop à Mykonos. Elle donne des leçons de morale en carrousels de 10 slides sur fond pastel. Elle vote LFI et n'a jamais vu un ouvrier ailleurs que dans un documentaire Arte.
Le bobo à trottinette. Il habite le 11e et déteste les voitures, sauf le SUV de ses beaux-parents pour aller au Cap Ferret. Il anime des Fresques du Climat le mardi et prend l'avion pour Bali le jeudi. Sa compensation carbone, c'est un tote bag.
L'étudiant révolutionnaire de Sciences Po. Il veut abolir le capitalisme d'ici ses partiels. Son père est notaire, sa mère est DRH dans le CAC 40. Dans cinq ans, il sera consultant chez McKinsey et votera centre gauche en disant qu'il a « mûri ».
Le sociologue. Il n'a jamais créé un emploi, jamais signé une fiche de paie, mais il sait exactement pourquoi votre entreprise est une structure de domination. Financé à 100 % par l'argent public qu'il juge mal réparti.
Le startuper « à impact ». Il a levé 3 millions pour une app qui fait la même chose qu'une autre app, mais avec le mot « solidaire » dedans. Il méprise le profit dans ses posts LinkedIn et le maximise dans son BSPCE.
L'héritier de la gauche caviar. Trois résidences, zéro jour de travail réel. Il milite pour taxer la richesse, sauf la sienne, qui est « patrimoniale », donc ce n'est pas pareil.
L'homme déconstruit. Il commence chaque phrase par « en tant qu'homme blanc cis, je me dois de... » et finit toujours par parler de lui pendant vingt minutes. Allié de toutes les causes, ami d'aucun des gens concernés.
L'intermittent subventionné. Sa pièce sur la précarité a été financée par trois régions et jouée devant 40 personnes, dont 38 autres intermittents. Il trouve que l'État ne soutient pas assez la culture.
Le journaliste « neutre ». Il ne fait pas de politique, il fait de « l'information ». Bizarrement, l'information penche toujours du même côté, et ceux qui le remarquent sont des complotistes.
L'élu municipal anti-voiture. Il a transformé votre rue en piste cyclable déserte, supprimé vos places de parking et fermé le pont que vous preniez pour aller bosser. Lui se déplace en voiture de fonction avec chauffeur.
Leur point commun : ils sont convaincus d'être du bon côté de l'histoire, alors qu'ils ont surtout toujours été du bon côté du compte en banque. La vraie France qui se lève tôt, ils la connaissent par les sondages.
Taguez celui qui en a reconnu trois à son dernier repas de famille.
🤖 Made with AI
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Federal Court case forces Health Canada to hand over its secret review of undeclared SV40 DNA in Pfizer's COVID shots
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
David Ike thinks Matt Hancock is a psychopath
I think he is correct
Hancock is responsible for signing off NG163. An NHS protocol which killed enormous numbers of vulnerable and elderly during the Scamdemic by treating them with Midazolam and Morphine which creates a fatal respiratory depression.
Everyone treated under NG163 died.
This is what killed Derek ‘Del’ Dimmock in June 2020 and is why there is a coroner’s inquest into his death.
Ask yourself why no one died at home from ‘Covid’ they all died in hospitals and care homes ?
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Mirroring riots from the USA, where pallets of bricks were delivered to the centre of disorder.
Pallets of glasses bottles dropped into the middle of French riots.
Find out who did this, and you're half way to finding the truth.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Większość z was może nie zna takich dziewczyn, ale ja znam wiele. To moje koleżanki ze studiów czy pracy, którym życie zweryfikowało ich liberalno-lewicowe poglądy. A wiecie co jest najgorsze? Że większość i tak się niczego nie nauczyła.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Florida pediatrician Dr. Brian Thornburg runs a concierge practice in Naples. He says he has several billionaires as patients.
Not a single one of them has ever vaccinated their kids.
He’s had six or seven over the years. Same result every time. He also said the most highly educated parents - often with PhDs in the sciences - are the ones most likely to refuse all vaccines.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Wat we weten:
1. Ze is lid van de Franse linkse partij en een activist, een van de grootste voorvechters voor het openstellen van migratie voor Noord-Afrikaanse volkeren.
2. Ze bezit een kleine chique boetiek op een chique locatie, ze stond in haar winkel in een poging die te redden van plundering en diefstal, en zei tegen hen dat ze een beroemde activiste is.
3. Ze zei tegen hen: ik ben zus-en-zo, de activiste voor asiel, ik sta aan jullie kant, ik heb jullie verdedigd en jullie toegang en verblijf in Frankrijk, ze spuwden op haar, sloegen haar neer en trapten haar met hun voeten, gelukkig leeft ze nog.
4. En ze plunderden de hele winkel, en verloren in een oogwenk al haar levenslange strijd en werk. Ze stond daar verdoofd, kon niet geloven dat deze stelende, opruiende, criminele, barbaarse horden degenen zijn die ze haar hele leven heeft verdedigd, en voor wie ze heeft gepleit om haar land binnen te vallen en te vernietigen
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
The newest painting in the Louvre. “The Girl with the Suicidal Empathy.” Oil on canvas. Go see it while the Louvre is still standing.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
"You reduce crime by eliminating poverty."
This is one of the greatest intellectual confusions of our century. It sounds compassionate. It feels obvious. And the moment you actually test it, it falls apart.
Let's look at the data.
First, the correlation is real. Nobody serious denies that poorer areas have more crime. In Sweden, kids from the poorest 20% of families are about 7 times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime than kids from the richest 20%.
But correlation is not causation. So Swedish researchers did something brilliant: they compared siblings. Same parents, same home, same upbringing, but different family income at different points in their childhood, because parents' income moves over time.
Result, on more than 500,000 children (Sariaslan et al., British Journal of Psychiatry, 2014): once you account for what's shared inside the family, the effect of income on violent crime goes from 7x to nothing. The hazard ratio drops to 0.95. No effect.
Finland ran the same test on 650,000 people. Same result: the income-crime link disappears when you compare siblings.
What predicts crime isn't the bank balance. It's what travels inside families.
Second test: what happens when poverty spikes for everyone at once? 2008. US unemployment doubled from 5% to nearly 10%. 15% of Americans officially poor. If poverty creates crime, crime should have exploded. Instead it fell. Year after year. Robbery, the most "economic" crime of all, dropped 10% in 2010 alone. Criminologists literally said they were stumped. Same story in the Great Depression: 25% unemployment, and crime went down in many cities.
Third test: take families out of poverty and see. The US government ran a randomized lottery called Moving to Opportunity. Thousands of families in public housing got vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. For boys, violent arrests dropped at first, property crime arrests went up, and over time the effects faded. New zip code. Same behavior.
Fourth: the claim that police don't matter. This one is just false. Chalfin et al. (American Economic Review: Insights, 2022): each additional police officer prevents about 0.1 homicides. And per capita, the lives saved are twice as many among Black victims as among white victims. The people who suffer most from "police don't matter" are the poorest neighborhoods.
So what does predict crime? The Dunedin study followed 1,000 children from birth to age 32. Self-control measured between ages 3 and 11 predicted adult criminal convictions, even after controlling for social class and IQ (Moffitt et al., PNAS, 2011). Cognitive ability matters too: across 700,000 Swedish men, lower cognitive scores at 18 track with violent convictions, and the link barely moves when you control for childhood socioeconomic status (Frisell et al., 2012).
And here's the part nobody quotes: in Dunedin, kids whose self-control improved over time did better than predicted. Behavior can change. Which means responsibility is real.
Why does this matter? Because "poverty creates crime" isn't just wrong. It's toxic.
It turns criminals into victims. The man who robbed you becomes a symptom of "the system," and you, the real victim, become a footnote in someone else's narrative.
It merges two completely different things. "You're poor, we'll help you" is one policy. "You're poor and you committed a crime, so we'll excuse you" is another. Fusing them insults the millions of poor people who work, raise their kids, and never hurt anyone. The vast majority of poor people are not criminals. That alone kills the theory.
It removes responsibility. Build a political system on "your circumstances made you do it" and you destroy the one thing that actually changes behavior: the certainty that you own your choices. Every excuse the state manufactures is an incentive.
And it feeds the state forever. If every crime is a social failure, every crime justifies a new program, a new budget, a new agency. Crime becomes the business model of bureaucracy.
The alternative is simple and old.
A lighter state that protects instead of explains. The same rules for everyone, from the projects or from a gated community. Certain, swift punishment for anyone who commits a crime. And never, ever telling someone their crime was written in their social condition.
Treating someone as responsible is respecting them. Excusing someone because they're poor is the most condescending thing you can do to them.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Stanisław Michał Błeszyński retweeted
Finally?
Yeah that's a funny choice of words.
Ryan has been exposed for ages.. but it takes someone from within the network to talk about it before it's called "exposure." huh.
BTW note the Leahfiles ZOOMED to the top as well.
Why is that I wonder?
Another guy with little talent who zoomed to top of YouTube because he’s boosted by pro Israel/Pro corporate/Pro Silicon Valley YouTube algorithm finally gets exposed.
Actual independent shows that challenge the establishment get labeled “borderline content” & suppressed by YouTube
Of course the Oligarchs were going pump billions into “independent” media to co-opt & control the narrative just like they do with legacy media.
It all about controlling what you think, in fact that’s the ONLY thing that matters to them. If you think you’re neighbors is your enemy then citizens fight each other, if you think your neighbor is suffering under the same Oligarchy as you then you JOIN with your neighbor to oppose the Oligarchs.
That’s why the only thing the Oligarchs have ever cared about is what you think.
Divide & Conquer