Gen Xer. History, politics, business buff. Read @JohnCleese for the latest on Iran and other world affairs.
Washington, DC metro area
Joined February 2022
- Tweets19.3K
- Following229
- Followers325
- Likes79.4K
splinter retweeted
LAWSUIT: FIRE and @FACoalition are suing the Los Angeles City Council for banning “nigger” and “cunt” from public comment.
No matter how offensive or repugnant one finds a word, government officials don’t get to decide which terms the public can use. The First Amendment doesn’t work that way.
The ban also prohibits all “variations” of the words, regardless of context. The policy itself won’t even print them in full, instead spelling them out letter by letter and listing forbidden suffixes.
An LA resident protested the ban by using “cunt” during public comment to criticize the policy. The council warned her, then removed her when she repeated the word.
And her punishment didn’t stop there. Under a separate policy, the council then barred the resident from attending all council and committee meetings for the next two days — six meetings total — violating her right to petition her government and speak with her representatives.
While the government can address actual disruption at a public meeting, it cannot simply declare specific words off-limits and treat their mere utterance as disruptive.
When the government can police the words people use, the list of forbidden words has a way of growing. In fact, the council president has already gone on the record saying there will be “additional steps” to restrict speech in the future.
We previously warned the council in a letter that these rules were unconstitutional. It ignored us.
Now, FIRE and FAC are taking the council to court to strike down both rules.
splinter retweeted
In response to the sexual assault allegations tied to a student fraternity, Ithaca’s Common Council will vote tomorrow on a month-long ban blocking @Cornell student groups from obtaining city permits to host assemblies, parades, and events.
Let’s be clear: This ban goes far beyond preventing misconduct, and broadly burdens all protected protests, rallies, and gatherings.
The result is self-defeating. Cornell students protesting any issue — including the one that prompted the moratorium — could be denied permits to assemble for the next month.
Ithaca can prioritize safety without restricting protected assembly.
splinter retweeted
We had a kid in our friend group accused of SA in college. A year or so later, huge shocker, she admitted it was all fabricated to avoid getting punished for underage drinking.
Without any investigation, our guy was removed from the officer commissioning program where he was one of the most competent and widely loved students in his peer group, and basically blacklisted on campus.
She took everything from him (at the time), most importantly his reputation. Left without many choices, he decided to enlist, and worked his way up to become an officer in one of the most elite and storied units in American military history.
He was and still is a good man, and I'm glad it all worked out for him. But there's a certain level of damage done when you falsely attach certain labels to people that never goes away, even after they are cleared of all wrongdoing. You can tarnish in a millisecond what it takes a lifetime to restore.
It's clear why God prohibits bearing false witness against our neighbor. In many cases, it's more harmful than murder.
splinter retweeted
It’s 2026 and we are still pretending that women are angels that are incapable of lying about something as heinous as rape for the sake of destroying a man?
-Crystal Mangum admitted in a 2024 prison interview that she fabricated the 2006 Duke lacrosse rape claims.
-Renee Skoglund pleaded guilty in 2023 after admitting she bought the rope and staged a fake sexual assault/kidnapping to cover up an extramarital affair.
-Nikki Yovino admitted fabricating rape claims against two football players to get sympathy from another man and pleaded guilty.
-Wanetta Gibson admitted on video that her accusation against Brian Banks was false. She lied about Brian Banks in 2002 to hide from her mother that she was sexually active.
We have due process and innocent until proven guilty for a reason and yet when it comes to rape accusations, all of this is thrown out the window.
unavailable
splinter retweeted
This is an impressive way to give a perfectly legitimate example of consent obtained through deception and then somehow draw the exact wrong conclusion from it.
No, she did not consent to sexual contact with the man impersonating her boyfriend. She consented to sexual contact with her boyfriend, because the other man deliberately deceived her about his identity.
But that does NOT mean consent can be revoked retroactively.
Seriously. What in the actual fuck?
If the deception invalidates consent, then valid consent to that person was never given in the first place. There is nothing to retroactively revoke.
You can revoke consent prospectively, I consented five minutes ago, I don’t anymore; stop.
You cannot ordinarily rewrite history, I freely and knowingly consented yesterday, but today I’ve decided that yesterday’s consensual act was actually nonconsensual.
Those are radically different propositions.
Your own hypothetical demonstrates the distinction beautifully and then you somehow trip over it at the finish line.
Yes doesn’t always establish valid consent is defensible.
Consent can be revoked retroactively is not the lesson of the example you just gave.
Words mean things. This is a particularly important subject on which to make sure you’re using the right ones.
It's actually really concerning how many people believe a "yes" or willingness to participate in sex is always consent. I don't know how many examples I can give before these people get it.
Here's another one. You're at a party with your gf. At one point she says she needs to lie down. Nobody is drunk, nobody has taken drugs. She's lying on a bed in whoever's house you're at, the room is dark. Another man slips in there, too dark to see, but has a similar build to you. He lays down next to her and whispers that he's you as he starts feeling her up. They make out and he fingers her. He slips back out of the room, and she goes to sleep until you come to get her later.
Little quiz for you. Did she consent to that? It's okay, take your time.
No. She did not. Despite not rejecting any advances. Despite participating. Despite even saying "yes" to "is this okay?" At one point, no, she did not consent.
Question 2. Why? I mean, she said yes. She didn't stop him. She wasn't drunk. She was even kissing on him. That HAS to be consent. It checks all of the boxes!! She can't retroactively take it back!!
She can though. Because her consent was under the condition that the person in the room was you. The person this other guy was pretending to be. It was too dark, your builds too similar. He didn't speak much. This is called consent obtained by fraud/deception.
So, yes does not always mean yes. Consent CAN be revoked, even retroactively. Consent is sometimes literally not able to be given. These are all true. Just because your tiny brain cannot conceptualize this does not make it less true.
splinter retweeted
And then the MeTooists say that women can't say no because he might get angry, leading to violence; and you say maybe women shouldn't be getting intimate with guys who seem like they might react violently to a "no"
And then they look at you like you have 3 heads
This is one of those things that falls in my folder of “MeToo has actually left women with fewer defenses against predatory men.” If a man is being slimy, pushy, weird, etc., you have the responsibility to say no, pick up, & leave. If he pushes past that, then, yes, call it rape/sexual assault, but not a minute before.
By eradicating the idea that women may at times have a responsibility to themselves and to their sexual partner(s) to say “no,” because that’s considered victim-blaming for some reason, MeToo seems to have convinced a lot of women that they literally *can’t* say “no” in an uncomfortable sexual situation, that their only choice is to be victimized by a guy who may very well be under the impression that he’s having a mutually enthusiastic sexual encounter because his sexual partner has not told him otherwise.
splinter retweeted
So many stories of women admitting they have made up accusations of sexual assault - yet still our society pretends false allegations are rare.
nitter.cf/joehex67/status/210641…
splinter retweeted
I sat on my thoughts about the Cornell case for a bit. I wanted more of the actual details before I said anything, because the madness flying around social media already was chaos, and I didn’t want to add to it.
A week later I’m more convinced the rush to judgment will do real damage. Serious questions came up about what happened that night at Cornell, and instead of anyone slowing down, a lot of people locked into the ugliest narrative and ran with it. Leaders and celebrities piled on with points that don’t hold up once you look at the record. That part genuinely bothers me. We keep doing this, and then we act surprised when nobody trusts anyone and we have a loneliness crisis.
The thing I can’t get past is the double standard on intoxication and responsibility. It’s looking more and more, from what’s actually known, like this sits closer to regret than to the story that spread. When a woman has been drinking or using, the default idea is that she stopped being a person who makes choices and became something that happened to her. The men in the room are still treated as fully responsible for every decision. I don’t know how we keep pretending that’s fairness.
Telling young women that the moment they’re around guys and substances they lose their judgment is one of the most disempowering things we do. It trains them to see themselves as victims on their own nights out. That belief harms them, it doesn’t protect them. We should want the facts of this case before anyone turns it into a lesson, but in the meantime we don’t have to use it to teach another round of girls that they have no agency once they choose to start partying.
One of the guys said back in 2024 that he felt like he was the one on the receiving end of sexual misconduct because he was too drunk to consent. Almost nobody wants to talk about that. If intoxication wipes out agency, it can’t only wipe it out for her.
And the leap to “fraternities are the problem and should be shut down” is lazy. We hear every bad night. We don’t hear the ordinary ones. As I wrote last month for the Daily Wire, research on men who were in fraternities keeps showing better outcomes later—graduation, jobs, networks, friend groups, family formation, how they rate their own lives. That doesn’t excuse whatever went wrong in that house or in other viral stories we hear, but scrapping the whole thing because of the worst chapters is just throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I’ve learned a lot recently from Fraternities Know Men, and their research shows fraternities could help solve our crisis of young men today—we just need to do more to reduce the cases of bad behavior which is the only thing that makes the headlines.
All of this fuels the divide between the sexes today. A lot of young men already feel like the world is against them, and watching how fast this turned into a mob doesn’t calm that down. Of course some of them are checking out and disengaging. The message they’re getting is that the world has already decided: men are the enemy, no matter what.
I keep hoping a case like this forces us to deal with the actual mess—accountability that runs both ways, the social-media conviction problem, the depravity of society today, the way we talk to girls about their own choices. I don’t think it will. Sadly, I think it just makes everything worse.
splinter retweeted
5 girls accused 1 guy of rape because they didn't like him.
A 19-year-old accused her teacher of rape because he wouldn't let her switch seats.
One woman accused 3 duke lacrosse athletes of rape.
Now, 1 woman is accusing 7 men of rape.
All of these women were between the ages of 14 and 28.
Are you telling me that a 15-year-old girl in the West already knows she has the ultimate weapon to ruin a man's life in seconds and get away with it?
5 girls in Pennsylvania accused a boy they did not like of these horrible sex crimes. After they told other people about their scam, their Snap posts were shared with the school and police and the girls admitted it was all a lie.
The boys lawyer and parents took a plea deal in the first case and did not seem to believe their own son.
The girls were never charged with a crime, and the civil suit was dismissed last year.
This is how our system treats men, and even boys. They can be convicted on words alone.
Opinion: Young women must take responsibility for their actions. Regretting one’s bad decisions is a far cry from rape. usatoday.com/story/opinion/c…
splinter retweeted
I wonder whether the people pushing the hysteria around the Cornell 7 realize they are giving Trump the "October Surprise" he's incapable of creating on his own?
They are reminding people why they voted for a vulgar, deceitful, narcissistic ignoramus over woke.
splinter retweeted
5 girls in Pennsylvania accused a boy they did not like of these horrible sex crimes. After they told other people about their scam, their Snap posts were shared with the school and police and the girls admitted it was all a lie.
The boys lawyer and parents took a plea deal in the first case and did not seem to believe their own son.
The girls were never charged with a crime, and the civil suit was dismissed last year.
This is how our system treats men, and even boys. They can be convicted on words alone.
splinter retweeted
In college I was close with a bf & fam I knew since HS. After we broke up, I got a late night call from lil bro distraught, asking if I could get him. He’d passed out drunk at a friend’s house & woke up to a girl arousing & riding him. He pushed her off & ran outside. 1/
splinter retweeted
My roommate sexually assaulted a girl in our college friend group. It became the talk of her sorority for weeks. A girl I dated in the same sorority must have felt like she wasn’t getting any attention. So, she told everyone that I beat her multiple times when we dated. I was ostracized from my entire friend group right as senior year began. I never got to share my side of the story.
2 years after college, she texted me that she “felt guilty” lying to everyone, apologized and wanted to make amends.
Glad you got to clear your conscious Madison. I’ll never get back my senior year of college.
And for the record, I moved to a different apartment after I found out what my roommate did.
splinter retweeted
We don't actually have a good idea how often women lie about being raped. Short of a confession, very difficult to prove.
But if you've defended rape cases, you've seen alleged victims contradicted by text messages, eyewitnesses, and physical evidence. Fairly often.
splinter retweeted
People don’t seem to understand that men and women ARE treated equally under the law when it comes to rape and false accusations
Forcing sex, drugging someone, or having sex with a person who is incapacitated are all rape, whether the perpetrator is a man or a woman
Publishing a false damaging public claim is defamation for both men and women
Making an intentionally false report to the police is a crime for both men and women
The difference between the way men and women are treated in these instances is due to SOCIAL ISSUES, not legal issues
Those harms are real for both sexes
Pretending they’re the legal system’s fault doesn’t help anyone
And trying to get revenge on the entire opposite sex for the stupid decisions of a few idiots makes things worse for everyone
splinter retweeted
Dear internet,
As a rape survivor, what bothers me most about the Cornell case isn't the case itself. It is all the damn virtue signaling around it.
Those of you declaring a side are no better than the high schoolers debating in the halls whether I was really raped or if his story that I was a pathetic whore was true.
There is a reason I never went to the police and it isn't because some people didn't believe me. It was because there would never be a fair trial in my small town. Before the weekend was even over the entire school knew.
You all are collectively making our nation a small town of gossips and vipers, poisoning jury pools and showing victims what exactly will happen if they ever speak up.
That includes "journalists" releasing leaked legal documents, evidence, and whatever AI slop comes along to get clicks.
That includes those of you screaming, "believe all women." You are the worst thing that has happened to survivors. You diminish our experiences by lumping them in with every false narrative ever spoken by a woman.
Victims know not all women are victims. We know some women outright lie. We know some women have regrets and rewrite the narrative. We know some women scheme and entrap men in order to destroy their reputation.
How do we know? Because they do it to women to. There is far more than one woman who believed my rapist, rather than me, out here screaming "believe all women" now that she thinks it makes her look good.
Every wrongfully convicted man means not only an innocent man's life was destoryed but if a rape did occur the rapist got away.
So, don't for one second think you are speaking for me when you are out here virtue signaling your presumed moral superiority while on that high horse of digital currency.
I have no idea what happened at Cornell. I wasn't there. That is not a hard, complicated, or immoral thing to say. It is the truth.
We can talk about holding men and women accountable for bad behavior without debating individual cases in public before any trial has even occurred.
We can talk about the toxcicity of Greek life on campus and campus cover ups without diminishing an individual story to politics and personal showboating.
Those conversations, held with civility, decorum, facts, and debating ideas may actually do some good to protect women, men, and children.
But that wouldn't be enough rage porn and dopamine drip for you all.
Signed,
The Rape Survivor You Don't Want to Hear From