Solgoodman (@solgoodman01) header
Solgoodman (@solgoodman01) profile picture

Husband, dad, antitrust lawyer.

Joined March 2018
Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)Photo by Solgoodman (@solgoodman01)
Still thinking about journalistic practices vs those of advocates. Tim Wu’s “The Age of Extraction” provides an example, with something I’d love to have reported on — but I suspect he may have gotten wrong. I’d just started at GCR when Google announced it had bought Waze… 1/
Seeking comment was the 1st thing I was taught when I started as a reporter, and has become an easy heuristic for whether others’ work is professional reporting vs advocacy. Highly recommend this to reporters, esp those who came from the advocacy side. 1/
1
1
1
1
628
This attack on Herb’s integrity is entirely unfair. Slurs like this corrode the conversation & mislead onlookers. I can’t think of anyone in antitrust who more obviously forgoes $ from interested parties than @Sherman1890. Plenty of folks are in compensated relationships with
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
3
4
1
49
6,455
The Senate is finally discussing crypto tax. I listened to the full 2 hour hearing so you don't have to. 🧵Here are the highlights, and changes we can expect:
20
20
2
75
11,470
1) Unbelievably sleazy behavior here. Stoller has no substantive response to Derek's actual arguments (eg "How can concentration explain the housing crisis if 49 of 50 US homebuilding markets aren't concentrated?"), so he baselessly accuses of Thompson of "unethical" conduct...
31
76
8
1,534
180,419
This is genuinely unbelievable. These antitrust goobers don't seem to realize that I have a telephone. This whole pathetic, pissy thread is about how I'm lying about my conversation with the real estate analyst Lance Lambert and misrepresenting him in my article. So, guess what I just did? Called Lance, of course! He told me again that he agrees with all of my major points and reiterated over and over that he's "pushing back" on the strongest claims of the antitrust left. Some notes from our call: 1. I read him the quotes from my article again in their full context. He signed off on everything. We went over it three times. He agrees with my language. He agrees with my position. "I stand by what I told you." That's a direct quote. 2. I asked him again, for clarification: Do you think homebuilders are a “cartel,” as Matt Stoller has claimed? He said no. 3. I asked again: Do you believe, as Basel Musharbash has claimed, that homebuilders are an “oligopoly"? He said no. 4. I asked him if he thinks that the biggest homebuilders are withholding supply or playing a key role in driving up prices. He said absolutely not. 5. This is a direct quote: "I hope you both communicate my view that I don't think the big builders are bad actors, or even that they have the power to be the bad actors." We're done here.
1. Ok, so I'm going to call out @DKThomp for journalistic malpractice and unethical behavior. He wrote a piece that was supposedly 'debunking' something that antitrust lawyer @musharbash_b put together on how Wall Street limits housing supply.
83
211
75
3,349
880,248
all you had to do was buy solana at $20, mint SMB, rotate into Solsteads, rotate into SSC, rotate in DCF, rotate into USDC, wait for the 50% haircut, rotate into Degods, and then rotate into a 10x Luna short but the influenzas convinced you that you wanted to be $IN
16
24
5
229