Soldcot retweeted
I usually dont agree with TA on sub 10M mc coins
But i fw this on robinhood:0xa4ddf89a40a35264e9d7f896a1ef01c59b1e977a
10M coin larping at 800k
Soldcot retweeted
All the animal plays $LEVERCAT $LEVERHEDGE on @LaunchOnSF
already cleared $1m mc and farming
@hylo_so xp . $LEVERDOG still under the line btw and seating at 170k, wen consensus to send the dog to 1m though??👀👀
Soldcot retweeted
literally nothing changed since this post about $ela
if you sold in a loss cause the dev didn't post for 24 hours??? i might have questions, but whatever. you should probably learn that it's normal when you are buying into a project, not a meme. it's pretty much impossible to feed you daily updates as it takes time to make those updates
if you are still holding, well, read the post again and know what you hold. dev didn't rug hl community on a crypto casino project, so he probably won't launch a completely new launchpad type for a 1m topper
if you want to ease the hold, check $szr from recent ones. dev didn't post for weeks and it ran to ath as soon as the decent update came out
noticed that all $ela bullposts are a bit difficult to understand or just blind bullish "coolest experiment" without explanation bla bla, so i'll try to break it down
to start with, any time you trade shitters, you are in a shitcoin/asset pool
the asset is usually eth, sol, another shitter or a tokenized stock these days
trading is basically swapping asset for shitcoin and back. people buy - price goes up, people stop - price stagnates
every launchpad you see competes on finding a cooler asset pairing - stables, tokenized stocks, leverage etc. but in the end it's still shitcoin/passive asset
and imo there are only two launchpads doing something truly new, which are $szr @SazareProtocol and $ela we are talking about
so, the actual reason ela can be called the coolest experiment is because it pairs launches with a yield generating position, instead of an idle one
the asset in ela is a loop
- eth buys staked eth
- that staked eth goes on aave as collateral
- more eth is borrowed against it
- more staked eth is bought via borrowed eth
- repeat
the result is 2x exposure to the staking yield sitting on the other side of the pair
now instead of just eth, you have eth +2x yield as your paired asset
so this asset side is growing on its own, which ofc means the shitcoin grows by itself even when there is no buy pressure
and also, 0.2% of every trade, buy or sell, adds to that same position and grows it permanently, so even dumps help in a way. a full round trip leaves the price higher than where it started
plus you can check the @RiskFDN account and see that on top of that there are $ela buybacks from trading fees
the second part no one covers, is who's building ela, which is probably even more important
you can find risk foundation account, see some cool followings, but if you dig just a bit deeper you'll find out that @0xWasa is one of the devs and when i saw his followers i was like wtf
i know that for most trenchers guys with .hl doesn't mean much since they call loracle the dude who short pons, but imagine your dev is followed by 10 ansems and solana foundation
@Hypurr @hypurr_co and more hl whales like mlm, henrik, obesepotato etc
but what is even better is that his other project @Vegas_HL is followed by same accs
do with that info whatever you want but i probably won't fade a dev who's trusted by 8fig hl whales
so yeah tldr is we have a dev with reputation and an actual working new tech. isn't it what every smart trader is looking at rn?
i'm pretty sure the reasons this is so undervalued are very stupid. no proper indexation on dexscreener or fomo and probably it being on eth mainnet
Soldcot retweeted
people dont really bid eth utility tokens anymore.
this one is about to change that:
0x0a5Aa8EdA423A6ee19D4dC3E1d39bEfC8aCC2477
Soldcot retweeted
kind of crazy that $ela is already at 1.7m and there are like 5 dudes on ct talking about
usually a great sign of an upcoming vertical run
we’ve seen sooo many of these in the last month it’s just painful to fade
best engineered thing on the chain.
$ELA by @tzv / @RiskFDN. one v4 hook is the whole market. no lp to pull, no pool to rug. the eth side sits in aave as wsteth, looped at 50% ltv. you hold a meme, the meme holds levered staked eth. hf 1.9, hard floor 1.315, anyone can delever it.
1% swap fee, a fifth stays as backing. every trade thickens the floor.
admin surface: none. no proxy, no pause, no setter. dev can claim his fee bucket and that’s the list. 1.27 eth in it, zero claimed.
vs pons, long, the rest: there the raise sits dead in a curve, then dead in a pool, until someone dumps it. here it’s staked and looped the second it lands. “backed” there means lp locked. here it means the contract holds the wsteth and quoteSell tells you what your bag is worth against it.
for builders: you can’t rug because you can’t, and buyers read that instead of hearing it. your pool opens fully backed at the average price paid, fdv = 2× raised, it’s in the code. you get a cut of every swap, so you earn on volume not on your own buyers. when the meme dies the token still says x eth of staked eth.
permissionless. same engine for every launch.
ethereum mainnet · 0x0a5Aa8EdA423A6ee19D4dC3E1d39bEfC8aCC2477
Soldcot retweeted
trading memes paired with leveraged tokens is the greatest unlock.
only 2 protocols offering it.
one on RHC. one on both.
do your homework.
Soldcot retweeted
since $FWA there has been one other ethereum mainnet protocol that is changing the game.
$ELA = token launchpad running a v4 hook to pair the token with 2-3x ETH leverage via @aave. protocol fees buy and ELA.
yeah, its genius.
How an ELA pair reprices without a trade.
In a normal AMM the quoted price comes from the pool state, and that state only moves when a swap moves it.
ELA replaces the passive ETH reserve with a live accounting value. The curve reads three terms:
e = e0 + navETH + bandEth
e0 is virtual ETH fixed at seed. bandEth is the real ETH sitting in the active band right now. navETH is the net equity of the leveraged position on @aave: wstETH collateral, minus the WETH debt, minus the fees already earmarked.
None of the three is a pile of tokens waiting in a pool. All of them are read live.
And what moves navETH is not the price of ETH. The collateral is valued at the wstETH/ETH ratio and the debt is owed in WETH, so an ETH/USD move cancels on both sides and changes nothing. What moves it is the wstETH staking yield accruing against the WETH borrow rate, levered by the pair. Three legs earning against two paying.
The token supply has not changed. The same tokens now claim a larger e, so the pricing function already implies a higher price. No swap, no arbitrage.
The only thing that has not updated is the last onchain print the screener shows.
The next swap fills at that implied price. Or anyone calls poke(), which folds the band back onto fair price and moves the pool without a fill. Either way the number becomes visible.
That is why candles can look chunky while the backing underneath moved continuously.
A trade does not drag the pair to its new price. It prints the price the backing already implied.
Soldcot retweeted
$ELA shipped a launchpad and it's not like the others
every other pad is generallly a version of the same thing: fixed supply, uniswap pool, nothing behind the token but the last buyer.
@RiskFDN's factory loops every buy into staked eth at 2x or 3x, leverage locked at deploy, no admin keys. sell anytime and it unwinds your share. first pad where the token actually holds something... and its ETH.
one thig people are getting wrong so far i think: "3x eth backed" reads like 3x eth price. it isn't. the loop is long wsteth short weth, so eth price cancels out. per eth in you get about 1x eth plus 3x the staking spread. roughly 2.6% a year vs 2.2% unlevered.
so the 3x is on the yield, not the price. memes launched here will get marketed as leveraged eth and trade like it until a red day shows it's 1x underneath. only real risk i could see is eth borrow rates spiking over staking yield, then the loop bleeds, but i'm guessing @RiskFDN has something for this.
this is the most honest backing for a launchpaid onchain.
currently on ETH... soon on RHC. imagine the eth whales getting their own pad... and it also being on RHC.
xitter.cf/RiskFDN/status/2096576…
ELA launchpad.
factory accepts two values: 2x, 3x. anything else reverts. leverage immutable post-deploy. every buy = wstETH/WETH loop, real collateral, no admin keys.
chain #2 in the bytecode already.
Soldcot retweeted
This is alpha
If you understand V4 hooks, you should look into $ela
This shit goes deep
OK, I spent time reading $ELA's contracts. Some of what I posted earlier was wrong, and the corrected version is more interesting.
What it actually is: a permissionless factory for ERC20s where the Uniswap v4 hook IS the market. The hook owns the only liquidity position, sweeps incoming ETH into a wstETH/WETH loop on Aave, unwinds the loop to pay sellers, and prices the token off live NAV instead of pool reserves. The pool doesn't hold the backing. The hook does, as a yield-bearing position that rebalances itself.
Correction 1: it is not leveraged ETH. ETH/USD cancels on both sides of the loop. What's levered is the gap between staking yield and borrow rate. At today's rates (Lido 2.2%, Aave WETH 2.0%) a 3x pair earns ~2.6%/yr on equity. Real, thin, and it goes negative if borrow rises above 3.3%. Buy it for the design, not the leverage.
Correction 2: the fee buybacks are not burns. Three so far, 0.4 ETH each, on riskfdn.eth. I traced the tokens: they go into the protocol's own LP band via helper contracts. No hidden selling. Just not scarcity — depth. Loop's origination fee does burn, separately.
What the "$5K liquidity" on the screener means: ~10% of liquidity sits in the visible band, ~90% is the engine's Aave equity. $10K sold in an hour drew from the engine. Effective sell-side depth is ~$60K, not $5K. Selling past the band costs the seller a flash loan premium and unwind slippage. That's the exit fee for leaving through the engine.
The floor: engine equity ÷ supply ≈ $0.06/token. Below that, buying and redeeming is arbitrage, so it can't stay there. At $0.85 that's 14x the floor — 93% story, 7% backing. The floor protects the last 7% of a crash, not the first 93%. It becomes material only if backing grows faster than price. Right now price is winning.
Team: @tzv named in the factory source. Every contract verified, no proxies. LoopLoop is fully immutable — every risk parameter constant, zero admin functions. Strongest trust posture I've seen on anything this week.
vs $HOOKR: both are launchpads. Hookr lets you configure conventional hooks - dynamic fees, anti-snipe, routing — with no code, and it has 25x the cap. ELA launches one template, but the template puts a live Aave position under every token it mints. Hookr can't build that pair; the hook is bespoke. More themes (hookr) vs the one theme nobody else has (ela).
vs RH paired stock meta: Pons memes have real stock in the pool and can pay holders in it - that's more than most memes get. But it's an x·y=k pool; the stock drains as price falls and nothing stops the slide. A meme launched on ELA has a protocol-owned Aave position redeemed near NAV. The joke can die; the floor doesn't.
Honest risks: unaudited, 5 days old, five pairs launched on day one and none since, and the leverage is currently earning 40bps. The engineering is the best in the set. The market for it hasn't shown up.
ethereum mainnet · 0x0a5Aa8EdA423A6ee19D4dC3E1d39bEfC8aCC2477
Soldcot retweeted
G🍐 everyone, another daily recap and overview of the PAIR ecosystem:
- We have almost reached $100M in all-time trading volume.
- Well over $600,000 in creator rewards distributed through the PAIR ecosystem.
- Over 2,000 launches on the protocol.
- Over $3M of $PAIR tokens burnt (over 10%).
- Multiple listings, such as @coingecko, @CoinMarketCap and @Aster_DEX, with plenty more on the way for exposure.
- Our next biggest update to be released in the next 24 hours.
Remember, community first. Family forever.
We will PAIR the world.
Soldcot retweeted
OK, I spent time reading $ELA's contracts. Some of what I posted earlier was wrong, and the corrected version is more interesting.
What it actually is: a permissionless factory for ERC20s where the Uniswap v4 hook IS the market. The hook owns the only liquidity position, sweeps incoming ETH into a wstETH/WETH loop on Aave, unwinds the loop to pay sellers, and prices the token off live NAV instead of pool reserves. The pool doesn't hold the backing. The hook does, as a yield-bearing position that rebalances itself.
Correction 1: it is not leveraged ETH. ETH/USD cancels on both sides of the loop. What's levered is the gap between staking yield and borrow rate. At today's rates (Lido 2.2%, Aave WETH 2.0%) a 3x pair earns ~2.6%/yr on equity. Real, thin, and it goes negative if borrow rises above 3.3%. Buy it for the design, not the leverage.
Correction 2: the fee buybacks are not burns. Three so far, 0.4 ETH each, on riskfdn.eth. I traced the tokens: they go into the protocol's own LP band via helper contracts. No hidden selling. Just not scarcity — depth. Loop's origination fee does burn, separately.
What the "$5K liquidity" on the screener means: ~10% of liquidity sits in the visible band, ~90% is the engine's Aave equity. $10K sold in an hour drew from the engine. Effective sell-side depth is ~$60K, not $5K. Selling past the band costs the seller a flash loan premium and unwind slippage. That's the exit fee for leaving through the engine.
The floor: engine equity ÷ supply ≈ $0.06/token. Below that, buying and redeeming is arbitrage, so it can't stay there. At $0.85 that's 14x the floor — 93% story, 7% backing. The floor protects the last 7% of a crash, not the first 93%. It becomes material only if backing grows faster than price. Right now price is winning.
Team: @tzv named in the factory source. Every contract verified, no proxies. LoopLoop is fully immutable — every risk parameter constant, zero admin functions. Strongest trust posture I've seen on anything this week.
vs $HOOKR: both are launchpads. Hookr lets you configure conventional hooks - dynamic fees, anti-snipe, routing — with no code, and it has 25x the cap. ELA launches one template, but the template puts a live Aave position under every token it mints. Hookr can't build that pair; the hook is bespoke. More themes (hookr) vs the one theme nobody else has (ela).
vs RH paired stock meta: Pons memes have real stock in the pool and can pay holders in it - that's more than most memes get. But it's an x·y=k pool; the stock drains as price falls and nothing stops the slide. A meme launched on ELA has a protocol-owned Aave position redeemed near NAV. The joke can die; the floor doesn't.
Honest risks: unaudited, 5 days old, five pairs launched on day one and none since, and the leverage is currently earning 40bps. The engineering is the best in the set. The market for it hasn't shown up.
ethereum mainnet · 0x0a5Aa8EdA423A6ee19D4dC3E1d39bEfC8aCC2477
Soldcot retweeted
$ELA is the free 20x (and more) here 😋
So all the new fomo and pump fun app traders are about to be front run by the OG trenchers who know how to sleuth on chain. @theunipcs buys $ela and deposits to his fomo wallet, but fomo can’t show the trade because of the v4 hooks @RiskFDN. Asymmetric trade @tonyGewrit