It’s important to understand that the humanism of the Renaissance (an interest in the humanities) is a different thing from modern Humanism (a secular religion).

"Stockpiled" 200 rounds is 50 fewer than our minimum order in FMJ ammo.

🇬🇧 Meanwhile at a Gym in London Muslim Man trains with Samurai Sword at his local Gym Anyone else see a problem here?

7 thousand distinct Redditors mocked Charlie Kirk within the first month after his assassination. They don't "just want healthcare" They want to kill you.

SOS! Students send 528 texts to their mothers a year trib.al/HzhHorW

"Sorry, you're not supposed to learn that today" Reddit mods use censorship to stick up for Lindsay Clancy defenders.

Islam is the common enemy of the entire civilized world.

🚨BREAKING: Laura Loomer has made explosive allegations about what she claims is happening inside mosques across America. Loomer stated that mosques are being used to stockpile military-grade rifles, grenades, knives, and explosives to arm military-aged Muslim men and illegal immigrants. She described it as a coordinated warfare operation aimed at subjugating Americans under Sharia law and urged people to arm themselves in preparation for what she called “Islamic jihad.” Islam is not only a private faith. It includes a comprehensive legal, political, and social system with doctrines on governance, law, warfare, and submission. Americans have every right to demand investigation of: - Foreign funding of mosques and Islamic organizations - Radical preaching and extremist networks - Any credible reports of weapons stockpiling or preparation for violence Religious liberty protects worship. It does not protect criminal activity, terrorism, or efforts to replace the U.S. Constitution with Sharia.

The left were not punished for the death of Charlie Kirk so they’re celebrating like Christmas No country can survive this level of division, but certainly not one that fancies itself a democracy The window to resolve this problem is closing rapidly

These juror interviews are fucking unbelievable. Not “concerning.” Not “disappointing.” Un-fucking-believable. These people sat in front of cameras and damn near confessed that they threw the law in the trash because they felt sorry for Lindsay Clancy. One juror admits she originally thought Clancy was guilty, then flipped her vote because she wanted “Lindsay to get the help she needs.” Help. You were not empaneled to run a fucking wellness spa. You were not there to hold her hand, book her a therapist, or make sure she landed somewhere soft. Your job was one thing: decide whether she was legally guilty based on the evidence in that courtroom. That was it. Not mercy. Not treatment. Not “she seems sad.” Guilt. If you thought she was guilty and changed your vote because you wanted her to “get help,” you did not follow the law. You replaced the law with your feelings. You should never have been in that box. Then another juror somehow found a dumber lane. She complained that prosecutors never brought in “character witnesses” to prove Clancy was a “bad mother.” What the fuck was she waiting for? A neighbor to take the stand and say, “Yeah, she was a nightmare at PTA and her casserole sucked”? She killed her three children. If that does not at least twitch a neuron in the “maybe not Mother of the Year” department, I do not know what testimony this juror was shopping for. And here’s the part that makes it even more asinine: prosecutors generally cannot just parade people in to say the defendant is a piece of shit. That kind of character dump can get tossed as prejudicial and irrelevant. So this genius punished the state for not introducing evidence they may not even have been allowed to introduce. You could not write stupidity this clean. Then she made it worse. The same juror called it a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” Viciously. Her word. And after accepting that Clancy viciously killed three kids, she still landed on not guilty. At that point words are dead. Facts are dead. The law is dead. You are just throwing emotional glitter around a courtroom and calling it justice. Another juror gushed about how “entertaining” the defense attorney was. Entertaining. Maybe next time they can pass out scorecards. Ten for charm. Eight for stage presence. Extra credit if counsel keeps the room giggling between autopsy photos. Then there was the juror who said “everything” in the case proved Clancy loved her children. Everything. Apparently “everything” includes strangling them to death. That little detail did not put so much as a dent in the grand theory of maternal devotion. These people do not sound like jurors. They sound like eleven random drunks pulled out of an airport bar and told to invent a legal system after three margaritas. By their own mouths, some of them were deciding whether she needed treatment, whether she seemed like a nice mom, whether her lawyer was fun to watch, and whether they personally felt bad for her. Those were not the questions. The question was guilt. They had one fucking job. And now they are on camera explaining, in their own words, how completely they wandered off and pissed on it. Absolutely fucking unbelievable. Thank god that one dude had the balls to stand up to these fucking dumbfucks!

This should be a huge Warning to ALL husbands who have a woman in their life that is obsessed with Lindsay Clancy