I’m pretty sure this is as close as GAO gets to dunking on something. -DOGE did not use its stated methodology to calculate the majority of savings associated with the contracts reported as terminated. -108 of the 264 leases identified for termination on the Wall of Receipts, about $15.3 million of the total $53.5 million in savings, were already in process for termination when DOGE was established. -DOGE reported all contracts on the Wall of Receipts as terminated, but our analysis of FPDS data shows that almost 2,000 contracts were not terminated. -basic math errors: $113 million in reported savings for the 264 leases was inaccurate. The information on the Wall of Receipts actually summed to $53.5 million. -$1.7 billion Defense Health Agency IT contract where DOGE agreed after meeting with DOD that no action should be taken and the Wall of Receipts kept reporting $1.7 billion in savings. And my favorite example: DOGE reported more than $28 million in savings on an Air Force contract awarded on behalf of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency for financial management modernization. Air Force descoped work and cut $28 million from the contract value, then extended it six months and awarded a $27.4 million sole-source follow-on to the same contractor for the same work.