smartpeereviewers is a platform that brings together reviewers who offer their services under new standards.
Joined September 2022
- Tweets212
- Following128
- Followers42
- Likes52
Pinned Tweet
👉Current flaws of the peer-review system that hamper scientific progress are:
⌛️Time consuming task
💲Abscence of reward
🤔Difficulty in finding reviewers
❌Biased and inconsistent reviews
🦥Slowness
75% of editors struggle to find qualified reviewers. 83% of reviewers ask for recognition and incentives.
Smart Peer Reviewers was created to change this: technology, fair payment, and quality in #PeerReview.
#OpenScience #Academic
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
La revista 'Sustainability' de MDPI es oficialmente quincenal, pero se inventa varios números especiales ¡cada día! para publicar miles de estudios insustanciales e ingresar millones, porque hay científicos que pagan para publicar rápido y fácil 👇🏽
xitter.cf/i/status/1370309130578…
Updated 2021 data on @MDPI special sssues.
8 journals have more than 1000 open special issues.
35 have more than 1 *per day*.
Sustainability has 8.7 *per day*.
This is predatory publishing.
Stand clear of them.
Casos así evidencian un problema estructural: sin rigor, transparencia y responsabilidad en la revisión, la ciencia pierde credibilidad. Profesionalizar y dignificar el peer review no es opcional, es parte de la solución.
La caída de una megarrevista científica expone el pelotazo de las editoriales en la ciencia. Una de las cabeceras que más estudios publican en el mundo ha sido expulsada del sistema por irregularidades. Su editorial, Elsevier, gana 1.300 millones al año:
elpais.com/ciencia/2025-11-2…
For years, peer review has been:
❌ Slow
❌ Invisible
❌ Unpaid
At Smart Peer Reviewers, we want to change that:
✅ Paid reviews
✅ AI support & recognition
✅ Quality seal
✅ Personal dashboard
Without reviewers, there’s no quality science. Time to acknowledge it.
75% of funders struggle to find qualified reviewers. 83% of reviewers want more recognition.
Smart Peer Reviewers solves both:
🔍 Reviewer matching
📚 Qualified database
🏅 Recognition
📊 Quality KPIs
If you run calls and want faster, reliable reviews, this is for you.
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
Science is at risk: slow reviews, few qualified reviewers, little recognition.
Smart Peer Reviewers speeds up evaluations and ensures fair, high-quality reviews.
🔍Quality
⚡Speed
🏅Recognition
🤝Trust
Transform peer review at your institution?
Science is at risk: slow reviews, few qualified reviewers, little recognition.
Smart Peer Reviewers speeds up evaluations and ensures fair, high-quality reviews.
🔍Quality
⚡Speed
🏅Recognition
🤝Trust
Transform peer review at your institution?
Everyone gets something from publishing.
Except reviewers.
That’s about to change.
#SmartPeerReviewers
“Ad honorem.”
A Latin expression meaning “without pay.”
Reviewers know it too well.
But fairness isn’t just a nice idea — it’s a right.
It’s time to erase “ad honorem” from peer review.
#ScientificReform #SmartPeerReviewers
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
The current peer review system faces serious challenges:
⏳ Time-consuming process
⚖ Biased and inconsistent evaluations
💸 No reward or recognition for reviewers
🐢 Slow decision-making
It’s time for a transparent, efficient, and fair model.
#ResearchIntegrity #ScienceReform
The current peer review system faces serious challenges:
⏳ Time-consuming process
⚖ Biased and inconsistent evaluations
💸 No reward or recognition for reviewers
🐢 Slow decision-making
It’s time for a transparent, efficient, and fair model.
#ResearchIntegrity #ScienceReform
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
Voy a contar por qué los médicos estamos tan hartos.
No es un problema salarial (aunque también), es un problema de dignidad profesional.
Y voy a tocar algún tema que puede ser incómodo. El petróleo barato.
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
Couldn’t agree more! Science publishing is not only one of the greatest scams, but it also greatly slows down scientific progress through gatekeeping. In the age of AI, this needs to be completely dismantled & replaced with fully open, free publishing in days, not months, with AI
Academic publishing is perhaps the greatest scam perpetrated on intelligent people
1) Write grants (unpaid)
2) Do research
3) Write papers
4) Peer review (unpaid)
5) PAY up to $12K to publish
6) Need publications to get grants (back to step 1)
Publishers: 38% profit margins
Peer review isn’t volunteering.
It’s expert scientific work — and it deserves fair compensation.
If journals and institutions rely on reviewers’ expertise, they should value it accordingly.
#PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
Science doesn’t move forward on its own.
Behind every paper, there are reviewers who read, correct, and improve, often without getting paid.
At Smart Peer Reviewers, we want to change that. It’s time to recognize their true value.
#OpenScience #PeerReview #SmartPeerReviewers
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
Now in press at Gastroenterology
📊 ESD vs TAMIS for early rectal neoplasms
🎯 RCT in 3 Spanish centers
🔹 0% recurrence with ESD at 12 months
🔹 Higher tech success
🔹 Shorter stay
🔹 Lower cost
Abstract👉 gastrojournal.org/article/S0…
#ESD #TAMIS #Endoscopy #RCT #ColorectalSurgery
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
📢 Esta semana nueva Newsletter por el día el Día Mundial del Colangiocarcinoma y Tumores de Vías Biliares ✨
📲 Infórmate y únete a la causa aquí 👉 bit.ly/4jTdvib
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
La mayoría de la gente sólo utiliza ChatGPT.
Pero los más listos aprovechan ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Grok, Midjourney, Flux, Ideogram, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Runway y Luma, todo en el mismo sitio.
He aquí cómo ↓
🤬How did we let researchers end up in this situation?
•We review more and more (demand is insane).
•At best, we get a Publons..
•When we publish, we pay increasingly higher fees for an outdated concept.
•Publishers making a fortune
@smartpeerreviewers for a change!
smartpeerreviewers retweeted
Preguntas comunes y respuestas razonadas sobre el #SIBO
Información para la práctica clínica, basada en la evidencia científica disponible. Para ayudarte en la toma de decisiones diagnósticas y terapéuticas.
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
